House Settlement Summary
We may have our roster by next week with this ruling on the horizon
So this ruling would basically allow universities to allocate 22% of their athletics budget to the athletes, right? Plus provide back-pay to athletes before 2021?House Settlement Summary
www.fosterswift.com
We may have our roster by next week with this ruling on the horizon
House Settlement Summary
www.fosterswift.com
We may have our roster by next week with this ruling on the horizon
Get it all you can get before these limitations take effect is my interpretationWhat does that have to do with our roster? Don't you think other teams would have the same issues?
Maryland is doing 14 million to football,, 4 million to men's basketball and 2 million to women's basketball..So, the 22% is for all of a universities athletes? That means the kids playing chess are going to get paid as well? How does the payment breakdown across the sports? Is it equal? Is it for all athletes or just those on scholarship?
If they don't distribute equally among all athletes then there will be lawsuits. It will be interesting to watch the fallout from this.Maryland is doing 14 million to football,, 4 million to men's basketball and 2 million to women's basketball..
The previous administration had released guidance (guidance, not actual policy) saying the revenue sharing needed to comply with Title IX. I believe currently that guidance has been rescinded, or at least we can probably all guess won't be acted on.If they don't distribute equally among all athletes then there will be lawsuits. It will be interesting to watch the fallout from this.