You my friend are 0-40 in your predictions.Let em hate....
40-0
It's garbage though, we beat the consensus #1 team and no one has a better win, period. The ranking isn't supposed to be who you think will be the best team, it's supposed to be merit based and UofL beat Miami, which is a far cry from MSU.I don't have a problem with it.
Whether I agree with him or not as far as UK being 6th to start the year and only 4th now isn't the point.
He clearly thinks UK is overrated. I don't think he's right. But I'd rather this and be consistent than to wild adjust ratings based on 1/2 games.
It's garbage though, we beat the consensus #1 team and no one has a better win, period. The ranking isn't supposed to be who you think will be the best team, it's supposed to be merit based and UofL beat Miami, which is a far cry from MSU.
He may think UK is overrated or he may just be very stubborn, very biased, or just being a jerk to get attention. If he really thinks UK is overrated, I wouldn't have a problem with it, either. But if it's anything else, I hope Parrish takes his dare (which is basically what the column is- "I dare you to call me out!") and writes a scathing column on this idiot.I don't have a problem with it.
Whether I agree with him or not as far as UK being 6th to start the year and only 4th now isn't the point.
He clearly thinks UK is overrated. I don't think he's right. But I'd rather this and be consistent than to wild adjust ratings based on 1/2 games.
It's still bullshit and needs to be called out. He is clearly biased and out for clicks w/ his hot take.This is why I pay no attention to the polls. None.
The guy either thinks the entire nation is overrating UK...........or he has some kind of bias.
When 64 of the 65 have us #1, I'm not really all that concerned with one writer.
I get it, but only 5 people didn't vote for MSU #1 and when you beat a team so overwhelmingly declared to be the best in the country, you deserve the recognition, especially when we were already consensus #2. There is no squirming around he can do to make this a legitimate vote. If Duke played MSU and won, then I'd have them #1 too because they'd have the best win and were already highly ranked.He may think UK is overrated or he may just be very stubborn, very biased, or just being a jerk to get attention. If he really thinks UK is overrated, I wouldn't have a problem with it, either. But if it's anything else, I hope Parrish takes his dare (which is basically what the column is- "I dare you to call me out!") and writes a scathing column on this idiot.
There was different guy that had us 9th and bumped us to #1I think the bigger issue IMO is the fact he thought we were 6th coming into the year when nearly everyone else had us ahead of that.
Because if he has us 2 or 3 or even 4 and we beat the #1 team on a neutral court it's basically a no brainer........which is why we are 1 in 64 out of 65 polls.
But what if u were this guy.........who has us 6th. Do you bump them up to 1 on the basis of 1 game? Probably not. I do think 4 is stil a bit ridiculous and the fact he bumped MSU down so far also makes me think he really does not like us lol. But i think it's his initial ranking that's the bigger problem.
This guy used to be a Red Sox beat writer and wasn't good at that. Possibly quite biased against Calipari, as are a lot of the sportswriters in New England. They're still butthurt that he left UMass 20 years ago.
There was different guy that had us 9th and bumped us to #1
Little Brother jealousyOnly voter not to vote uk #1
I think thats fair, because no games had been played and we've often been over ranked to start a season. BUT, once he had evidence of our team, he corrected his error, which shows impartiality unlike this other deebag.That's ridiculous lol.
What eight teams did he think were better than us coming into the season.
Some of the people doing these polls are terrible.
I think thats fair, because no games had been played and we've often been over ranked to start a season. BUT, once he had evidence of our team, he corrected his error, which shows impartiality unlike this other deebag.
Looks like a dude that just spent an entire weekend in his boxers Kermit Frogging to an old poster of Rick Pitino.
Which is a valid point if the teams rankings were vastly different, like 150 vs 2. A valid point if we had more games to go on. But we don't the only thing we got is #2 beat #1 and should be ranked as such. If this was 26 games into the season I'd totally agree w/ your point.Yeah but we don't want to put too much stock in one game.
I mean Pittsburgh is crap...........but they lost to Nicholls St. They beat Florida St tho, which in turn beat Florida. There's no one that thinks Nicholls St >>>>> Pittsburgh
It was a big win and it's going to look great on our resume. It might even be our highest rated win of the season if MSU does what we think they are going to do. But we can't put too much stock into just one game.
Correction Kentucky will humiliate LoservilleKentucky will spank Louisville