I feel like we'd be worldbeaters in the PAC-12 espeically with a Brad White led defense.11-1 with THIS defense?
17 points won't beat anyone in the Pac 12, even with a Brad White defense.I feel like we'd be worldbeaters in the PAC-12 espeically with a Brad White led defense.
Georgia
Michigan
TCU
Ohio St
Final 4 and I agree even if TCU loses to KState, they'll get in.
Utah QB looks like he’s ready to steal S-10’s on methAnyone else think Brock Huard looks like that Wolfenstein character?
How did Utah lose 3 games
Physically dominant
Agree. TCU could lose by a bunch and still make it over a 10-2 Bama. They might not hold #3 if they lose by 30 or more however.Don't see it. Tcu already beat kstate and is clearly the best team in the big 12.
No way committee would make michigan play osu in the semifinals either. And no way bama with 2 losses jumps to 3.
I stand by my stance tcu stays at 3 no matter tomorrows outcome.
Until Stoops changes his philosophy of 'complementary football' on offense, it won't matter who the OC is.17 points won't beat anyone in the Pac 12, even with a Brad White defense.
Stoops has got to get the offense fixed this time.
Not a USC fan but didn't want to see them lose and now OSU is in. Ga. deserves playing a #4 USC or TCU not a #4 OSU but that appears how it going to be since committee I assume will not want a OSU-Mich rematch in the Semis.
This is a year where a second real OOC game would have helped Alabama. Another win over a Top 20 team and you’d have a case for putting them ahead of Ohio State with two losses.Don't see it. Tcu already beat kstate and is clearly the best team in the big 12.
No way committee would make michigan play osu in the semifinals either. And no way bama with 2 losses jumps to 3.
I stand by my stance tcu stays at 3 no matter tomorrows outcome.
I would argue that Bama with 1, 4 and 6 point wins and 2 losses is a weaker pick than tOSU who dominated in every other game except Michigan. Bama's schedule was a bit harder but not really that much difference and when you look at all the scores it's pretty obvious which team is more dominate.I know it won't happen but Bama should get in over tOSU IMO. Bama has 2 tough road losses by a total of 4 points while tOSU had the debacle at home.
tOSU also has a road win over a Top 10 team. As I stated in another post, Alabama needed another OOC game against a real team this year.I know it won't happen but Bama should get in over tOSU IMO. Bama has 2 tough road losses by a total of 4 points while tOSU had the debacle at home.
I disagree. I also don’t think that is anyone’s philosophyUntil Stoops changes his philosophy of 'complementary football' on offense, it won't matter who the OC is.
I wouldn't use 'dominant' to describe either. You can't lose at home by 22 to your biggest rival in the last game of the season and describe your season as dominant. If it had occurred early, you could say they'd improved.I would argue that Bama with 1, 4 and 6 point wins and 2 losses is a weaker pick than tOSU who dominated in every other game except Michigan. Bama's schedule was a bit harder but not really that much difference and when you look at all the scores it's pretty obvious which team is more dominate.
This is a year where a second real OOC game would have helped Alabama. Another win over a Top 20 team and you’d have a case for putting them ahead of Ohio State with two losses.
I didn't say they were dominant, I said they were dominant in every other game - they beat Wisconsin by 31, MSU by 29, Iowa by 44, Indiana by 42 etc. now look at Bama's scores many of which were squeakers.I wouldn't use 'dominant' to describe either. You can't lose at home by 22 to your biggest rival in the last game of the season and describe your season as dominant. If it had occurred early, you could say they'd improved.
Stoops himself has said his offense is "complementary football." He has said it many times.I disagree. I also don’t think that is anyone’s philosophy
Irrelevant, I know but head to head at a neutral site, who are you putting your money on, Bama or tOSU?I didn't say they were dominant, I said they were dominant in every other game - they beat Wisconsin by 31, MSU by 29, Iowa by 44, Indiana by 42 etc. now look at Bama's scores many of which were squeakers.
One game doesn't define a team, you have to look at their entire body of work. UGA lost to Bama last year and went on to win the Natty.
Irrelevant, I know but head to head at a neutral site, who are you putting your money on, Bama or tOSU?
I would go with tOSU, Bama just isn't the dominate force this year that we're all use toIrrelevant, I know but head to head at a neutral site, who are you putting your money on, Bama or tOSU?
Georgia played two P5’s although that would admittedly be tougher in past years when Georgia Tech was pretty good. But some leagues, like the B1G, play nine conference games. So Ohio State played ten real games, Alabama only played nine. Basically I’m just saying there just isn’t enough there to justify putting Alabama over Ohio State with two losses. I wish there was.Who plays 2 tough OOC games?
1 plays 4 and 2 plays 3, no matter the conferenceNot a USC fan but didn't want to see them lose and now OSU is in. Ga. deserves playing a #4 USC or TCU not a #4 OSU but that appears how it going to be since committee I assume will not want a OSU-Mich rematch in the Semis.
Game played at Jerry World (AT&T Stadium) or 19 miles from TCU campus. Would enjoy watching Horn Frogs pull this off.I'm going to turn this into the all conference championships thread to avoid multiple threads.
TCU vs. KState about to start