| Team | O | D | ODM | T | ASM |
1 | Duke | 129.1 | 89.7 | 39.4 | 66.2 | 26.1 |
2 | Auburn | 130.7 | 94.3 | 36.4 | 68.3 | 24.9 |
3 | Florida | 127.1 | 92.9 | 34.2 | 69.6 | 23.8 |
4 | Alabama | 127.4 | 98.1 | 29.3 | 75.1 | 22.0 |
5 | Houston | 124.3 | 89.2 | 35.1 | 61.3 | 21.5 |
6 | Tennessee | 119.2 | 88.1 | 31.1 | 63.8 | 19.8 |
7 | Gonzaga | 125.1 | 97.9 | 27.2 | 70.4 | 19.1 |
8 | Michigan St. | 118.1 | 91.1 | 27 | 67.8 | 18.3 |
9 | Texas Tech | 124.8 | 97.2 | 27.6 | 65.9 | 18.2 |
10 | Wisconsin | 123.9 | 97.2 | 26.7 | 67.7 | 18.1 |
11 | Iowa St. | 118.7 | 92.8 | 25.9 | 68.9 | 17.8 |
12 | Kentucky | 125.2 | 100.2 | 25 | 70.9 | 17.7 |
*Stats come from Kenpom
O* - Points per 100 possessions
D* - Opponent points per 100 possessions
ODM - Scoring margin per 100 possessions
T* - Number of possess per 40 minutes
ASM - Scoring margin adjusted for tempo
Very rudimentary metric I will admit. Just wanted to see what I could put together in a few minutes (I am a data analyst by trade so like playing with numbers.) Looks like the same teams are near the top as in your model, although in different order. The last 10 champions had an average ASM of 21.2, so the top 5 on this list would fit that average. We would need to get our D down to 95 points per 100 to hit that average.
Also, if I need to remove this from your thread I do not mind. Just let me know.