http://finance.yahoo.com/news/one-play-shows-why-nba-172756021.html
The kid can do everything he should and shouldn't be able to do. Just wow.
The kid can do everything he should and shouldn't be able to do. Just wow.
I still think Woods is the best... more money titles, more scoring titles, more player of the year awards. More total pga tour wins that nicklaus. More seasons with five or more wins than anyone else. Ppl want to say nicklaus bc he has more majors...but does that also mean ucla is better than UK?I think its best to let Davis earn his own reputation. Folks are doing a "Tiger Woods" on him. There were fans of Tiger that were ready to proclaim him the best golfer that ever lived after a single Masters win. They would nearly fight about it. Of course, while Tiger was a fabulous golfer, he is one of many great players and the chances of him earning the GOAT golfing title look pretty glum today.
One thing we can agree on. Davis is having an outrageous early career which continues at an astounding pace. I'm hoping it continues.
I think its best to let Davis earn his own reputation. Folks are doing a "Tiger Woods" on him. There were fans of Tiger that were ready to proclaim him the best golfer that ever lived after a single Masters win.
This is just nonsense. Nobody was proclaiming Tiger the best ever after only "a single" Masters win, BUT there certainly were some making such proclamations after he'd won FOURTEEN MAJORS in less than 12 years, and after he won the PGA Player of the Year Award a record ELEVEN TIMES, more than any golfer in the sports history. And all before reaching his mid 30s.
While there is a degree of truth to your point--the last six years of Tiger's career certainly has been quite a letdown from what came before--you're being misleading about the facts. There was plenty more basis for those proclamations than you make it sound.
I still think Woods is the best... more money titles, more scoring titles, more player of the year awards. More total pga tour wins that nicklaus. More seasons with five or more wins than anyone else. Ppl want to say nicklaus bc he has more majors...but does that also mean ucla is better than UK?
Sorry to derail the thread.
I still think Woods is the best... more money titles, more scoring titles, more player of the year awards. More total pga tour wins that nicklaus. More seasons with five or more wins than anyone else. Ppl want to say nicklaus bc he has more majors...but does that also mean ucla is better than UK?
Sorry to derail the thread.
barring more injuries anthony will be a top five nba player all time. what is he, twenty two? can't argue with what lebron did last year, but davis is closing in.
This is just nonsense. Nobody was proclaiming Tiger the best ever after only "a single" Masters win, BUT there certainly were some making such proclamations after he'd won FOURTEEN MAJORS in less than 12 years, and after he won the PGA Player of the Year Award a record ELEVEN TIMES, more than any golfer in the sports history. And all before reaching his mid 30s.
While there is a degree of truth to your point--the last six years of Tiger's career certainly has been quite a letdown from what came before--you're being misleading about the facts. There was plenty more basis for those proclamations than you make it sound.
Agree with UKbob..Big Dan was the best..Davis might someday be the best UK player to play in the NBA , but Dan was the best to ever play at UK..Record speaks for itself.
I was thinking same thing almost verbatim. Then I thought how much AD meant as a player. Mash and Dan didn't take the least amount of shotsI would say 2 things about AD:
1. He's the most accomplished player ever in a UK uniform. Despite playing only 1 year, the accolades he got and leading us to a title are the best ever at UK.
2. He is well on his way to having the most successful pro career of any player in UK history.
However, I do think there is a distinction between most accomplished and greatest player. I think there were possibly better college players at UK during their time (a lot of people will disagree with this). I think if you look at guys like Issel and Mashburn, they could be in discussion for better college player, but they also both played 3 years, which gives them a huge advantage over AD. Had AD stayed 3 years, he could possibly be the most celebrated college player ever...that's how freaking skilled he was. I do know this, his one year at UK will go down as greatest single season and I don't think anyone could top it.
At UK, clearly, but what I said was AD will go down as the best who ever played here, not the best while he was here. If AD stays healthy, Issels NBA success will be dwarfed by AD.From an outsider Issel is still y'all best