23-24 UK Multi Team Event

[Tampa_cat54]

The Big10 figured this out and it's why they get so much love even though they are overrated.

Yeah and it's especially true with how many championships the Big 10 has won in recent memory.

Wait....what's that? That conference hasn't won a championship since 2000? 23 years?

Wow- so maybe the Big 10 doesn't have it figured out?

And oh- by the way, the Big 10 champion, PURDUE, also played 2 games against teams that were sub-300. Same as Kentucky.

Man, it's really exhausting just slapping people around on here- right @kyjeff1? Because you for some reason disregarded everything else I said again and hid behind THIS argument from somebody else...which also proves my point even further. I've shredded you on here so many times now it's hard to comprehend.

Comedy at it's finest on here.

 

[Rideordiewildcat]

Yeah and it's especially true with how many championships the Big 10 has won in recent memory.

Wait....what's that? That conference hasn't won a championship since 2000? 23 years?

Wow- so maybe the Big 10 doesn't have it figured out?

And oh- by the way, the Big 10 champion, PURDUE, also played 2 games against teams that were sub-300. Same as Kentucky.

Man, it's really exhausting just slapping people around on here- right @kyjeff1? Because you for some reason disregarded everything else I said again and hid behind THIS argument from somebody else...which also proves my point even further. I've shredded you on here so many times now it's hard to comprehend.

Comedy at it's finest on

here.

Yeah and it's especially true with how many championships the Big 10 has won in recent memory.

Wait....what's that? That conference hasn't won a championship since 2000? 23 years?

Wow- so maybe the Big 10 doesn't have it figured out?

And oh- by the way, the Big 10 champion, PURDUE, also played 2 games against teams that were sub-300. Same as Kentucky.

Man, it's really exhausting just slapping people around on here- right @kyjeff1? Because you for some reason disregarded everything else I said again and hid behind THIS argument from somebody else...which also proves my point even further. I've shredded you on here so many times now it's hard to comprehend.

Comedy at it's finest on here.

Slapping people around LMFAO

First off I said the Big10 figured out the NET which helps with seeding. Not that they are good. I said they are overrated, but way to cherry pick for your narative.

 

[kyjeff1]

Yeah and it's especially true with how many championships the Big 10 has won in recent memory.

Wait....what's that? That conference hasn't won a championship since 2000? 23 years?

Wow- so maybe the Big 10 doesn't have it figured out?

And oh- by the way, the Big 10 champion, PURDUE, also played 2 games against teams that were sub-300. Same as Kentucky.

Man, it's really exhausting just slapping people around on here- right @kyjeff1? Because you for some reason disregarded everything else I said again and hid behind THIS argument from somebody else...which also proves my point even further. I've shredded you on here so many times now it's hard to comprehend.

Comedy at it's finest on here.

Dude, you haven't shredded anybody.

-UConn was a 4 seed, not a 1, so you can't say their weak SOS didn’t hurt them. You just can't.

-Then you brought up Texas (2 seed) and Kansas (1 seed). Did you even bother to look at their SOS? No, you didn't. Both those teams could have played sub 300 teams for the entire months of November and December and it wouldn't have mattered (obvious exaggeration), because every game both teams played in the BIG12, was a quad 1 opponent. That’s a huge advantage.

Playing sub 300 teams greatly affects your SOS ranking and what the hell do we gain by playing these teams? Nothing, that’s what.

 

[Tampa_cat54]

Slapping people around LMFAO

First off I said the Big10 figured out the NET which helps with seeding. Not that they are good. I said they are overrated, but way to cherry pick for your narative.

Wait this is actually hilarious @Rideordiewildcat - truly, truly hilarious.

There was exactly ONE Big 10 team that finished Top-30 in the NET. ONE. (Purdue).

There was also only ONE Big 10 team that finished higher than Kentucky in the NET (also, Purdue).

The SEC had 5 teams finish top-30 in the NET.

The Big 12 had had SEVEN teams finish Top 30.

Even freaking Conference USA had 2 teams finish Top-30 in the NET (same as the Mountain West and American Conference).

The Big 10 had...ONE.

So HOW exactly has the Big 10 "figured out the NET"?????????

Yeah....I am slapping you guys around in this thread and it's truly, truly hilarious.

You have proven my point right here.

You guys do absolutely ZERO research and have ZERO facts behind your narratives and complaints- you just make them up and then get upset about them- and then when someone brings actual facts into the equation, you don't like it.

But would seriously LOVE for you to explain to me how you came to the assumption that the Big 10 has "figured out the NET" this past season based on the information above???