Saw them play Archer, watched so much football that day everyone ran together. But thinking back, almost everyone there was running a spread. Hell man, I am old and forget, I just remember CC won and King getting loose for some nice runs, but I thought he had a fullback with him. Was wrong again, what can I say? I think KIng will be successful at the college level.Originally posted by ARC Dog:
Lol Grumpy you've never seen Colquitt play I suppose.
Rivals lists King as 5-8, 175. When Boom Williams committed to us in June, 2013, Rivals listed him at 5-8, 180. King is listed as a 4.4 40 guy. Williams 4.39. End of story. Nothing to really discuss there unless someone thinks Boom isn't a legitimate SEC running back.Originally posted by Rhavicc:
I know there are some here who have a knock on this kid, saying he's too small to compete in the SEC.
So, again, I have to ask... what separates the two? Why was Boom Williams a 4 star running back rated the number 4 overall APB and 118th overall recruit in the nation, as well as a top 10 player in Georgia while King is a 3 star unranked player at his position, in the nation, and in the state of Georgia?Originally posted by Blue Decade:
Rivals lists King as 5-8, 175. When Boom Williams committed to us in June, 2013, Rivals listed him at 5-8, 180. King is listed as a 4.4 40 guy. Williams 4.39. End of story. Nothing to really discuss there unless someone thinks Boom isn't a legitimate SEC running back.Originally posted by Rhavicc:
I know there are some here who have a knock on this kid, saying he's too small to compete in the SEC.
Why don't you email some of these services and find out why he isn't ranked higher and give examples of guys his same size ranked considerably higher.Originally posted by Comebakatz3:
So, again, I have to ask... what separates the two? Why was Boom Williams a 4 star running back rated the number 4 overall APB and 118th overall recruit in the nation, as well as a top 10 player in Georgia while King is a 3 star unranked player at his position, in the nation, and in the state of Georgia?Originally posted by Blue Decade:
Rivals lists King as 5-8, 175. When Boom Williams committed to us in June, 2013, Rivals listed him at 5-8, 180. King is listed as a 4.4 40 guy. Williams 4.39. End of story. Nothing to really discuss there unless someone thinks Boom isn't a legitimate SEC running back.Originally posted by Rhavicc:
I know there are some here who have a knock on this kid, saying he's too small to compete in the SEC.
You seemingly cannot argue a lack of exposure considering that he wasn't just playing on some tiny team hidden out in the boondocks of Georgia. No, he was playing for a big time school that one a title in the biggest classification in Georgia. So, he seemingly had plenty of exposure. Enough to be a USA Today AA.
So, what are your thoughts on why he is unranked if it isn't his size? (By the way, I am not trying to talk down or badly about the kid. I am just curious.)
I know that Rivals listed Boom as a 5'8 RB, but I'm not entirely sure where they got that, or his speed, even weight for that matter.Originally posted by Blue Decade:
Rivals lists King as 5-8, 175. When Boom Williams committed to us in June, 2013, Rivals listed him at 5-8, 180. King is listed as a 4.4 40 guy. Williams 4.39. End of story. Nothing to really discuss there unless someone thinks Boom isn't a legitimate SEC running back.Originally posted by Rhavicc:
I know there are some here who have a knock on this kid, saying he's too small to compete in the SEC.
I do not think the problem is heart because IMO the kid showed a lot of it in the Championship game that I just watched. He got blasted several times and got up and played the next play. I also would not class the kid as small. He was just short but he had a muscular body. He wasn't one of those skinny weak looking types. IMO he will be 185 to 190 by this fall. IMO it is very possible that this is a kid that the star rankers miss on.Originally posted by *Bleedingblue*:
Why don't you email some of these services and find out why he isn't ranked higher and give examples of guys his same size ranked considerably higher.Originally posted by Comebakatz3:
So, again, I have to ask... what separates the two? Why was Boom Williams a 4 star running back rated the number 4 overall APB and 118th overall recruit in the nation, as well as a top 10 player in Georgia while King is a 3 star unranked player at his position, in the nation, and in the state of Georgia?Originally posted by Blue Decade:
Rivals lists King as 5-8, 175. When Boom Williams committed to us in June, 2013, Rivals listed him at 5-8, 180. King is listed as a 4.4 40 guy. Williams 4.39. End of story. Nothing to really discuss there unless someone thinks Boom isn't a legitimate SEC running back.Originally posted by Rhavicc:
I know there are some here who have a knock on this kid, saying he's too small to compete in the SEC.
You seemingly cannot argue a lack of exposure considering that he wasn't just playing on some tiny team hidden out in the boondocks of Georgia. No, he was playing for a big time school that one a title in the biggest classification in Georgia. So, he seemingly had plenty of exposure. Enough to be a USA Today AA.
So, what are your thoughts on why he is unranked if it isn't his size? (By the way, I am not trying to talk down or badly about the kid. I am just curious.)
Services put a huge premium on attending camps (specifically, their camps). Maybe King didn't hit the camp circuit hard. Same thing happened to Matt Elam. Recruited by the best of the best with .01% size and athleticism and he was a middle of the road 3* on Rivals mostly because he never went to a Rivals campOriginally posted by Comebakatz3:
So, again, I have to ask... what separates the two? Why was Boom Williams a 4 star running back rated the number 4 overall APB and 118th overall recruit in the nation, as well as a top 10 player in Georgia while King is a 3 star unranked player at his position, in the nation, and in the state of Georgia?Originally posted by Blue Decade:
Rivals lists King as 5-8, 175. When Boom Williams committed to us in June, 2013, Rivals listed him at 5-8, 180. King is listed as a 4.4 40 guy. Williams 4.39. End of story. Nothing to really discuss there unless someone thinks Boom isn't a legitimate SEC running back.Originally posted by Rhavicc:
I know there are some here who have a knock on this kid, saying he's too small to compete in the SEC.
You seemingly cannot argue a lack of exposure considering that he wasn't just playing on some tiny team hidden out in the boondocks of Georgia. No, he was playing for a big time school that one a title in the biggest classification in Georgia. So, he seemingly had plenty of exposure. Enough to be a USA Today AA.
So, what are your thoughts on why he is unranked if it isn't his size? (By the way, I am not trying to talk down or badly about the kid. I am just curious.)
Colquit County is one of those football magnet schools outside of metro Atlanta. I am not sure King was a transfer into the school but I think he was. If he was he could have played at one of those small schools out in the middle of nowhere and got no attention until he transferred to CC. Another reason is everyone of these recruiting services have camps that are used for giving stars. They naturally rank the kids who attend them higher than those who don't, again I don't know for a fact if he did or didn't attend those camps, but if he didn't it negatively affected his ranking. I know Boom attended them in Athens, and as gung ho as his dad was I would think there was a good chance he attended more than one. Another thing used in Georgia is an all star game called Rising Stars or Rising Juniors, something like that where Jrs are invited to play and showcase their skills. There were several backs in metro Atlanta who probably got those invites over him and thats another reason. Good player and he will be a nice fit in UK's offense, I don't think he is near as thick as Boom, right now, but I think he was better than Boom in HS. He played much tougher competition. Like someone said those Stadiums alone I-75 in south Ga look like small college stadiums, in fact Valdosta State use to and may still play their home games in one.Originally posted by Comebakatz3:
So, again, I have to ask... what separates the two? Why was Boom Williams a 4 star running back rated the number 4 overall APB and 118th overall recruit in the nation, as well as a top 10 player in Georgia while King is a 3 star unranked player at his position, in the nation, and in the state of Georgia?Originally posted by Blue Decade:
Rivals lists King as 5-8, 175. When Boom Williams committed to us in June, 2013, Rivals listed him at 5-8, 180. King is listed as a 4.4 40 guy. Williams 4.39. End of story. Nothing to really discuss there unless someone thinks Boom isn't a legitimate SEC running back.Originally posted by Rhavicc:
I know there are some here who have a knock on this kid, saying he's too small to compete in the SEC.
You seemingly cannot argue a lack of exposure considering that he wasn't just playing on some tiny team hidden out in the boondocks of Georgia. No, he was playing for a big time school that one a title in the biggest classification in Georgia. So, he seemingly had plenty of exposure. Enough to be a USA Today AA.
So, what are your thoughts on why he is unranked if it isn't his size? (By the way, I am not trying to talk down or badly about the kid. I am just curious.)