ADVERTISEMENT

100,000$ or 40-0 which one..... go

$$ is overrated. History on the other hand is, well, history...

What Wildcat-in-STL didnt tell you is the payout is $1000 (rolls of quarters) a year for 100 years....always read the fine print.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wildcat-in-STL
Money.I think a tougher question would be 100k or a title? Some fans don't care about 40-0. I guess take the money and the Cats may go all the way to the Title game, but would guaranteed to not win. Don't take it and they will win.
 
Kind of silly, you have to take the money. But if it was $1,000? I'm going for 40-0.. Maybe even up to $5,000.

A better question is "40-0 or two titles?" Probably in the minority here, but I'm going with 40-0.
 
Ha, I'm sure you're busting. But Kentucky has titles, and we're going to get more. More titles during Cal's time, and more after. 40-0 is perfection and immortality. Anytime some dumb fan says "Well Kentucky isn't that good..."

40-0

"Yeah but that was 4 years ago and.."

40-0.

They would be the undisputed best team of all time, and personally, I think the only way this happens is under Calipari, and at Kentucky.. getting all this talent. I'm not sure 40-0 is really attainable any other way unless it's some fluke.
 
I'd take 100k and back to back titles to make the Calipari Era banners look something like this:
2011- FF
2012- Champions
2014- Magic Run, Runner up
2015- 38-1 magic season, FF
2016- Champions
2017- Champions

Edit: Eff it, 40-0

We would also have a shot to repeat next year
 
Sorry I guess I should have explained. I love uk basketball and football but I'm only 21 and I plan on getting married and buying a house in the next year. The 100k would just be a life changing thing for me.
 
Money. I'd could pay off my student loans today if I had 100 grand instead of... some day.

With the way Calipari has us rolling I would never bet against us to win the NCAAT anyway, I don't need to pass up $100,000 for a title. Even hypothetically.
 
I'll take the 40-0 and National Champs, money is nice and all, but I'm good (I am by no means rich, but my bills are paid, I have a roof over my families head and we have food on the table). I don't need a ton of money to be happy, what makes me happy is UK winning.
 
40-0 assuming I can place a good bet on it. In the end I'll walk away with much more than $100k + a UK record to brag about.

If I can't bet on the 40-0, then just give me the money.

Doesn't matter, we've already established that this team is going 40-0.
 
I believe in the Cats enough to know that they don't need my money to go 40-0 so I'll go ahead and keep the money based strictly on my faith in the team to do it without my illegal donation.
 
40-0 would be nice but $100K in my bank account would be just a little bit nicer.
 
its_raining_money_wired.jpg
 
You should win enough off of your Vegas bet to pay off your mortgage or you're not doing it right.

The only bet you would be 100% on is UK going 40-0, which really goes against the premise of the question to begin with. Otherwise, you still have a spread you are betting against. More than likely in a 40-0 year, they are favored in every game, you would have to wait till there is a game that is even or not favored to be sure you win. They can still win a game and lose your bet by not covering.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT