ADVERTISEMENT

“Might be good news for UK football in portal”

I sense that they have come to the conclusion that getting small school standouts that want to move up get high visibility and a shot at the League, is a safer choice as opposed to getting P4 team's 4 stars that "for some reason" have not played a lot, have been injured or underperformed.
So... winners? Wow... tough call, right?
 
I sense that they have come to the conclusion that getting small school standouts that want to move up get high visibility and a shot at the League, is a safer choice as opposed to getting P4 team's 4 stars that "for some reason" have not played a lot, have been injured or underperformed.
Isn't it possible too that UK didn't have many players interested in them and therefore we kind of had to go to smaller schools? I mean we did just have an awful season.

That said obviously I hope they all work out whether they are from a big or small school.
 
Isn't it possible too that UK didn't have many players interested in them and therefore we kind of had to go to smaller schools? I mean we did just have an awful season.

That said obviously I hope they all work out whether they are from a big or small school.
No! This was their strategy 💯. JR reported that b4 the portal started. Grace hasn’t signed yet but if he does they add 3 four star DL and a four star OL all from small schools. I’m not 100 convinced that it will matter but these are legit 4 star guys no matter where they came from. All have proven they can play
 
No! This was their strategy 💯. JR reported that b4 the portal started. Grace hasn’t signed yet but if he does they add 3 four star DL and a four star OL all from small schools. I’m not 100 convinced that it will matter but these are legit 4 star guys no matter where they came from. All have proven they can play
It's definitely a different strategy. It could either save or cost Stoops his job depending on how the year goes.
 
It's definitely a different strategy. It could either save or cost Stoops his job depending on how the year goes.
As has been stated before, the staff hasn’t been very successful in developing talent. So taking guys that have already shown they can play makes sense. But can they utilize that talent?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lost In FL
Isn't it possible too that UK didn't have many players interested in them and therefore we kind of had to go to smaller schools? I mean we did just have an awful season.

That said obviously I hope they all work out whether they are from a big or small school.
Nah. Pretty sure the staff decided they were going to target some smaller school studs this cycle as they have learned that taking highly recruited HS players that didn’t pan out elsewhere (BVG, Courtland Ford, etc) was for a reason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bluecoon1
Isn't it possible too that UK didn't have many players interested in them and therefore we kind of had to go to smaller schools? I mean we did just have an awful season.

That said obviously I hope they all work out whether they are from a big or small school.
Could be. A 4 win record and coach on the hot seat doesn't help attract top talent. OTOH it's still the SEC and UK has plenty of NIL money so there's that. I lean more towards it being their strategy though. A lot of really good, and sometimes overlooked players are in the GO5 schools and even FCS level produces some gems from time to time. Other schools may be overlooking these players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: catben
Its not common but there are players on Sunday who are from FCS schools. Let's hope Stoops and Company have identified a couple of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: catben
True but the MT TE is not a priority or really even a need unless another TE leaves. They would be very happy to get Edwards, Grace, or Pete. Those are the top priorities but the Cooleys are takes as long as money is available.
It’s kinda sad that a key consideration is if “money is available” to secure a commitment but unfortunately that’s the reality of the CFB landscape as it exists today.
 
I hope we compliment pursuing future Wandale, Levis, Ray Davis, and JDJ’s of the world with hungry G5 players. Seems reductive to me to say one type is better than the other writ large. Always come down to the individual eval and their market price…which maybe de-emphasizing high ceiling divas. I’m good with that all things being equal but still gotta vet and eval.
 
I hope we compliment pursuing future Wandale, Levis, Ray Davis, and JDJ’s of the world with hungry G5 players. Seems reductive to me to say one type is better than the other writ large. Always come down to the individual eval and their market price…which maybe de-emphasizing high ceiling divas. I’m good with that all things being equal but still gotta vet and eval.
The ONLY key to long term success is recruiting and development. Plain and simple. Do you think that Bama, GA, TX, OSU lives by the portal? They recruit and develop. Evaluation of HS talent is also the starting point.
 
The ONLY key to long term success is recruiting and development. Plain and simple. Do you think that Bama, GA, TX, OSU lives by the portal? They recruit and develop. Evaluation of HS talent is also the starting point.
With the portal being what it is these days, teams don't have as much opportunity to recruit and develop as they once did. The portal is full of former 4 star recruits who bolted after their freshman or RS Freshman seasons. Talented kids simply aren't going to wait their turn. If they can't get a lot of playing time right away at the schools they're at, they are going to seek new schools where they have a better chance of receiving that playing time. Then there are the kids who are ready to jump to the highest bidder. Coaches and fans can no longer count on "recruiting and developing" because half of the kids they bring in as freshmen won't be there beyond their sophomore seasons. It is a mess. I think the reason the SEC has been down somewhat this year is largely due to the portal. Teams like Alabama and Georgia could once stockpile talent to the point where they had 3rd string players just as talented as their starters. For whatever reason, it appears these two specific teams have been hit harder by portal losses than the other top teams. I would imagine that may because of how dominant they've been in recent years and how in demand their players are.
 
The ONLY key to long term success is recruiting and development. Plain and simple. Do you think that Bama, GA, TX, OSU lives by the portal? They recruit and develop. Evaluation of HS talent is also the starting point.
Nice plan until another team comes along and takes the player(s) that you developed.
Not saying you're wrong, but the trend I see coming is more and more high school players are going to wind up in G05 or FCS programs initially out of high school, while P4 schools use their roster spots on portal players. It just make sense numbers wise to have 85 guys on your roster that are already developed and can fill a spot on the depth chart instead of redshirting or just sitting until they have developed more physically and knowlege wise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: catben
The ONLY key to long term success is recruiting and development. Plain and simple. Do you think that Bama, GA, TX, OSU lives by the portal? They recruit and develop. Evaluation of HS talent is also the starting point.
OSU and TX both have qbs from the portal. Both had several key players from the portal.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT