as are a significant number.
Let me rephrase the Original Post, to pull the skeptics into the real intended subject of my query.
If instead of my statement “that this much is certain,” to which many object, I had said there were many witnesses who claim knowledge of and connection to retrieval of NHI materials . . . would you support the further inquiry and public release of information.
I realize the demands of scientific rigor. But I also have some feel for probabilities and likelihood.
I can’t prove that US intelligent agencies killed Pinochet’ and Allende’, but it is widely accepted that the CIA led to their downfalls/deaths, based upon 50 years of circumstantial evidence and leaks.
So, hypothetically, is it a risk, or a benefit to further examine the facts behind the verbal statements being made regarding UAP’s, their possible retrieval and current possession?
Yes, ultimately extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. If credible witnesses emerge who can lead us to such extraordinary evidence, should the public, at-large, be allowed to know the truth?