So do you chalk Bud's performance up to coaching as well or just the negative things the coaches' fault?Originally posted by jnewc2:
2. Why wasn't he playing like this all season long--especially with Bud drawing so much attention? (A reflection on coaches or himself?)--I personally think it's a reflection on coaching; Eliot's/Stoops' defense has been the most disappointing part of the Stoops' era
Bud's a freak. I'm pretty sure he could have been a decent enough CB in man coverage, the scheme we played wasn't going to slow him much. Our scheme (coaching) put our defense in a position to succeed but it pulled Z away from his natural position of 4-3 SDE often and while he's a plus defender in a college 3-4, it's not to his strength and not a position that would allow him o shine. Playing 4-3 in the bowl as the other DE from the U mentioned gave him both a chance to shine. The scheme (coaching) that allowed for team success this season pulled Z's numbers down and played away from his strengths. I'm sure you know that but you're arguing with a wall right now. Best to use the ignore feature and not quote.Originally posted by TransyCat09:
So do you chalk Bud's performance up to coaching as well or just the negative things the coaches' fault?
Agreed.Originally posted by THE_OAK:
^You hate Eliot more than anyone I know on this board.
I did not see the game but my guess is in this game he was playing DE in a straight up 4-3 scheme (All Star games are characterized by easy to install offenses and defenses; the 3-4 is much trickier than the 4-3).Originally posted by jnewc2:
So, I guess we could look at this two ways:
1. Great that he had a good game, or
2. Why wasn't he playing like this all season long--especially with Bud drawing so much attention? (A reflection on coaches or himself?)--I personally think it's a reflection on coaching; Eliot's/Stoops' defense has been the most disappointing part of the Stoops' era
Don't forget Smith was very inexperienced, started playing football late. Could turn out good for him while he continues to develop physically and gains experience. He probably just scratched the surface of his ability at UK.Originally posted by ukalumni00:
Smith rarely showed the ability to get around or physically beat the better SEC tackles he faced. He had some good plays but many times he was ineffective. Many many times he would try to speed past someone only to be taken out of the pocket area or be flushed at the LOS. I could never figure out if he lacked technique or just not physically good enough. I really like the guy and hope he can get it done in the NFL but I have concerns if he has the ability to really make plays at the NFL level.
Different players and different situations. The move to the 3-4 helped Bud but hurt Z. In our 3-4 scheme he was basically an undersized DT. That's not his skill set. I liked the move to the 3-4 but it did hurt Z.Originally posted by jnewc2:
So, I guess we could look at this two ways:
1. Great that he had a good game, or
2. Why wasn't he playing like this all season long--especially with Bud drawing so much attention? (A reflection on coaches or himself?)--I personally think it's a reflection on coaching; Eliot's/Stoops' defense has been the most disappointing part of the Stoops' era
Exactly the man started out the season slow but by the time conference play started he was very solid. I don't get the constant hate on the part of some of our fans. The same clowns rag on our coaches, players, AD, ect. I can only assume that most of our football fans are much more knowledgable than the average poster on this board. The man wouldn't be in the Shrine game and the Senior bowl in the first place if he was the giant bust some of you claimOriginally posted by SaguaroCat:
The guy was a 3-4 DE who was third on the team in tackles, second in sacks, and second in tackles for losses. Pretty good production for his position.
Good point. Hoping he does really well at the next level. I think where fans were somewhat frustrated with him was that he was touted as a bigtime recruit (based on the offers he had) and I think there was a high level of expectation that was tough for him to live up to. He struggled against SEC tackles but at times had some great games and showed flashes of major potential.Originally posted by highlysuspicious:
as noted by many above, z was playing the three technique this year which limited his pass rushing ability. guy is going to be a steal for whoever drafts him.
I'm growing to hate the SEC network. They should call it the Alabama Network or the SEC West Network. Unbelievable that they talked about other SEC players who "played well" and they didn't mention Z. Smith at all much less that he won the defensive MVP award. How much time will Finebaum spend on talking about UK's basketball team's dominance of Bama?Originally posted by TransyCat09:
SEC Network did a wrap up of the game and talked about the SEC players in the game and didn't even mention Za'Darius. Pathetic
Originally posted by ARC Dog:
Like every team UK plays a 4-2-5 nickel most of the time - Dupree and Smith were on the outside just like 4-3 ends of old. They were one on one with OTs virtually every play.