ADVERTISEMENT

Yet More Offensive Complexity from Calipari vs. Alabama

pascat

Senior
Aug 19, 2003
4,972
637
113
Some notes about UK's offensive attack vs. The Tide, in what I thought was UK's best game of the year…


(1) UK ran 25 half-court offensive plays in the first half and 16 in the second half. This is because Grant decided to press more in the 2nd half and UK got more transition baskets and got fouled more in the backcourt.

(2) Alabama ran an extremely confused zone for the entirety of the first half. It varied from a 1-2-2, to a 2-3, to a 3-2, to a 2-1-2. I could not tell if it was intentionally confusing or not. On one play alone in the first half, they ran 3 different zone looks. UK adjusted to each of these looks with ease, largely because of the superior ball handling by Andrew and Ulis, who patiently waited for the offense to get to their spots.

(3) Alabama was never going to win this game, but the entire game turned with Johnson's post play and when Grant reacted by prematurely abandoning the man-to-man defense in the second half. Bama had cut the lead to 39-30 off of a tough man to man defense, and Johnson then scored 3 points on two consecutive plays to make it 42-30. Grant flat out panicked. He ordered his team to press more (perhaps to disrupt Johnson) and UK got easy points from Alabama overplaying, allowing UK to stretch the lead to 49-32 and effectively ending the game. He compounded the mistake by calling off the press and switching back to a zone and it was 57-36 in no time. The looks on UK's players' faces told the story: Johnson was the spark in the 2nd half.

(4) In the first half, 15/25 plays were UK's basic offense against the zone (a 4-man game with the shooter standing still on wing, a high post screen, and the PG deciding whether to drive, pass, drive and kick, or shoot). There were many more wrinkles, however. About 7-8 times, the PG would pass and cut sharply to the baseline. About 4-5 times, the PG would run a circle cut. Both of these wrinkles seemed designed for Ulis alone, owing to his ability to shoot. Clearly, Calipari is involving him more in UK's scoring plays.

(5) The remaining 10/25 plays in the first half were extremely intriguing. Cal used a 1-2-2 zone attack, and even had Booker and Aaron in the game at the same time as two shooters on the wing. UK did not execute this look well, but some GREAT spots opened up on the floor, particularly with bigs flashing to the free throw line. Yet another wrinkle.

(6) No less than 10 times, UK's guards abandoned the play and directly fed the post from near the 3-point line. UK's bigs were dynamite today in the post. The shots did not always fall, but the footwork was terrific.

(7) Dakari Johnson is arguably UK's best offensive player against a man-to-man defense. His eyes absolutely light up in these spots. He is not as good at flashing in the lane against a zone. But when he can isolate his man on the blocks, it's over.

(8) Underrated: Marcus Lee's passing ability in a zone attack. He is like a pogo stick, flashing to fill those gaps. His vision is good and his passes are on the money.

(9) Although the basic M2M attack is a rub screen b/w the high post and the PG, the most intriguing attack against the M2M was a 1-4 attack, with the PG at the top of the key and the other four players in a line parallel to the baseline, mid key. Tremendous variation in this set up, including switches, back cuts, fake cuts, and ISO's. The player who looked most comfortable in this setup was Lyles. He is a matchup nightmare in the open floor. UK ran no less than 5 versions of this play. I really liked it.

(10) It is becoming clear that the two hardest working players in a Calipari offense are the PG and the center. UK's centers set a TON of screens.


This post was edited on 1/18 5:54 AM by pascat

This post was edited on 1/18 6:29 AM by pascat
 
Hey, thanks for the great breakdown. I noticed some things we were doing different and doing well, but I certainly didn't understand what was going on quite like you did. I hope you keep posting your observances.
 
This post-game critique is excellent. Thanks for all your work. Keep feeding us.
This post was edited on 1/18 6:25 AM by Katsure
 

About 7-8 times, the PG would pass and cut sharply to the baseline. About 4-5 times, the PG would run a circle cut. Both of these wrinkles seemed designed for Ulis alone, owing to his ability to shoot. Clearly, Calipari is involving him more in UK's scoring plays.

I liked this wrinkle, he was basically getting Ulis and Booker in a triangle on the same side as DJ to make it hard to double. Worked very well.
 
Originally posted by qwesley:

About 7-8 times, the PG would pass and cut sharply to the baseline. About 4-5 times, the PG would run a circle cut. Both of these wrinkles seemed designed for Ulis alone, owing to his ability to shoot. Clearly, Calipari is involving him more in UK's scoring plays.

I liked this wrinkle, he was basically getting Ulis and Booker in a triangle on the same side as DJ to make it hard to double. Worked very well.
Yep. Against Mizzou, the Tigers were giving us the wing-to-post pass all day. But because Bama was playing a forward zone (or at times 3-2), that cut allowed Ulis to go behind the defense and shoot or give Dakari a post entry pass.

Not an easy play to run, but they did it!
 
Originally posted by UKjanitor:
Fascinating observations, thanks. I'll give you a "Go-Liverpool!"
As the folks in Birmingham say, Aston Villa couldn't score in a brothel.
 
Great stuff. I am watching and learning. Would it be difficult to put in a fast break after a made basket like Iowa State and UNC run? Two could we run a play for Lyles where he gets it at the foul line against the zone and could wheel and shoot or dump it low. Looks like teams pack the base line to stop the lob? UK in the real old days always had that free throwine shooter against the zone
 
Kenny Walker made a living like this. Also remember Chuck Verderber filling that role some, though not a large offensive threat.
 
Pascat!

You deserve a game off to just sit back and watch and enjoy! That's a ton of analysis that takes time
 
I appreciated Aarons patience in the game. He was picking spots and not just shooting the first look he had, made all the difference.
 
Originally posted by pascat:
Some notes about UK's offensive attack vs. The Tide, in what I thought was UK's best game of the year…


(1) UK ran 25 half-court offensive plays in the first half and 16 in the second half. This is because Grant decided to press more in the 2nd half and UK got more transition baskets and got fouled more in the backcourt.

(2) Alabama ran an extremely confused zone for the entirety of the first half. It varied from a 1-2-2, to a 2-3, to a 3-2, to a 2-1-2. I could not tell if it was intentionally confusing or not. On one play alone in the first half, they ran 3 different zone looks. UK adjusted to each of these looks with ease, largely because of the superior ball handling by Andrew and Ulis, who patiently waited for the offense to get to their spots.

(3) Alabama was never going to win this game, but the entire game turned with Johnson's post play and when Grant reacted by prematurely abandoning the man-to-man defense in the second half. Bama had cut the lead to 39-30 off of a tough man to man defense, and Johnson then scored 3 points on two consecutive plays to make it 42-30. Grant flat out panicked. He ordered his team to press more (perhaps to disrupt Johnson) and UK got easy points from Alabama overplaying, allowing UK to stretch the lead to 49-32 and effectively ending the game. He compounded the mistake by calling off the press and switching back to a zone and it was 57-36 in no time. The looks on UK's players' faces told the story: Johnson was the spark in the 2nd half.

(4) In the first half, 15/25 plays were UK's basic offense against the zone (a 4-man game with the shooter standing still on wing, a high post screen, and the PG deciding whether to drive, pass, drive and kick, or shoot). There were many more wrinkles, however. About 7-8 times, the PG would pass and cut sharply to the baseline. About 4-5 times, the PG would run a circle cut. Both of these wrinkles seemed designed for Ulis alone, owing to his ability to shoot. Clearly, Calipari is involving him more in UK's scoring plays.

(5) The remaining 10/25 plays in the first half were extremely intriguing. Cal used a 1-2-2 zone attack, and even had Booker and Aaron in the game at the same time as two shooters on the wing. UK did not execute this look well, but some GREAT spots opened up on the floor, particularly with bigs flashing to the free throw line. Yet another wrinkle.

(6) No less than 10 times, UK's guards abandoned the play and directly fed the post from near the 3-point line. UK's bigs were dynamite today in the post. The shots did not always fall, but the footwork was terrific.

(7) Dakari Johnson is arguably UK's best offensive player against a man-to-man defense. His eyes absolutely light up in these spots. He is not as good at flashing in the lane against a zone. But when he can isolate his man on the blocks, it's over.

(8) Underrated: Marcus Lee's passing ability in a zone attack. He is like a pogo stick, flashing to fill those gaps. His vision is good and his passes are on the money.

(9) Although the basic M2M attack is a rub screen b/w the high post and the PG, the most intriguing attack against the M2M was a 1-4 attack, with the PG at the top of the key and the other four players in a line parallel to the baseline, mid key. Tremendous variation in this set up, including switches, back cuts, fake cuts, and ISO's. The player who looked most comfortable in this setup was Lyles. He is a matchup nightmare in the open floor. UK ran no less than 5 versions of this play. I really liked it.

(10) It is becoming clear that the two hardest working players in a Calipari offense are the PG and the center. UK's centers set a TON of screens.


This post was edited on 1/18 5:54 AM by pascat

This post was edited on 1/18 6:29 AM by pascat
I was at the game I believe I heard on the radio after game that two of Bamas starters got their 4th foul at the time they got the lead down to 9, then UK blowed it back open, so I am not sure that Grant panicked.
 
Originally posted by jrm693:


Originally posted by pascat:
Some notes about UK's offensive attack vs. The Tide, in what I thought was UK's best game of the year…


(1) UK ran 25 half-court offensive plays in the first half and 16 in the second half. This is because Grant decided to press more in the 2nd half and UK got more transition baskets and got fouled more in the backcourt.

(2) Alabama ran an extremely confused zone for the entirety of the first half. It varied from a 1-2-2, to a 2-3, to a 3-2, to a 2-1-2. I could not tell if it was intentionally confusing or not. On one play alone in the first half, they ran 3 different zone looks. UK adjusted to each of these looks with ease, largely because of the superior ball handling by Andrew and Ulis, who patiently waited for the offense to get to their spots.

(3) Alabama was never going to win this game, but the entire game turned with Johnson's post play and when Grant reacted by prematurely abandoning the man-to-man defense in the second half. Bama had cut the lead to 39-30 off of a tough man to man defense, and Johnson then scored 3 points on two consecutive plays to make it 42-30. Grant flat out panicked. He ordered his team to press more (perhaps to disrupt Johnson) and UK got easy points from Alabama overplaying, allowing UK to stretch the lead to 49-32 and effectively ending the game. He compounded the mistake by calling off the press and switching back to a zone and it was 57-36 in no time. The looks on UK's players' faces told the story: Johnson was the spark in the 2nd half.

(4) In the first half, 15/25 plays were UK's basic offense against the zone (a 4-man game with the shooter standing still on wing, a high post screen, and the PG deciding whether to drive, pass, drive and kick, or shoot). There were many more wrinkles, however. About 7-8 times, the PG would pass and cut sharply to the baseline. About 4-5 times, the PG would run a circle cut. Both of these wrinkles seemed designed for Ulis alone, owing to his ability to shoot. Clearly, Calipari is involving him more in UK's scoring plays.

(5) The remaining 10/25 plays in the first half were extremely intriguing. Cal used a 1-2-2 zone attack, and even had Booker and Aaron in the game at the same time as two shooters on the wing. UK did not execute this look well, but some GREAT spots opened up on the floor, particularly with bigs flashing to the free throw line. Yet another wrinkle.

(6) No less than 10 times, UK's guards abandoned the play and directly fed the post from near the 3-point line. UK's bigs were dynamite today in the post. The shots did not always fall, but the footwork was terrific.

(7) Dakari Johnson is arguably UK's best offensive player against a man-to-man defense. His eyes absolutely light up in these spots. He is not as good at flashing in the lane against a zone. But when he can isolate his man on the blocks, it's over.

(8) Underrated: Marcus Lee's passing ability in a zone attack. He is like a pogo stick, flashing to fill those gaps. His vision is good and his passes are on the money.

(9) Although the basic M2M attack is a rub screen b/w the high post and the PG, the most intriguing attack against the M2M was a 1-4 attack, with the PG at the top of the key and the other four players in a line parallel to the baseline, mid key. Tremendous variation in this set up, including switches, back cuts, fake cuts, and ISO's. The player who looked most comfortable in this setup was Lyles. He is a matchup nightmare in the open floor. UK ran no less than 5 versions of this play. I really liked it.

(10) It is becoming clear that the two hardest working players in a Calipari offense are the PG and the center. UK's centers set a TON of screens.



This post was edited on 1/18 5:54 AM by pascat


This post was edited on 1/18 6:29 AM by pascat
I was at the game I believe I heard on the radio after game that two of Bamas starters got their 4th foul at the time they got the lead down to 9, then UK blowed it back open, so I am not sure that Grant panicked.
I think pascat was being kind stating that Grant panicked. Grant made a poor adjustment, it didn't work, and then, it seemed, he was lost. Grant has made poor ingame decisions his entire time at Bama. He is a very overrated coach, but, he dresses very nice.

Never have been impressed with his coaching and he has had decent talent since arriving at Alabama.
 
Excellent breakdown. I thought the key was the great interior passing against the zone. Lee and all,the bigs were great and seeing the other one wide open. It's like a light went off
 
Thanks, OP. Great stuff and keep it coming. It appears you have some coaching tutelage under your belt which many of we posters do not. You not only do a nice job with your analysis, but with explaining it in reasonable fashion we can understand.

I love to re-watch Billionth's radio sync games he places on here. I think I'm going to adjust with reading your posts before I watch his replay and attempt to utilize the "lessons" you are providing us.

Much thanks again.
 
Great read, thanks. They also were double teaming our big when we threw the ball in low which left another big open with room to operate or get the offensive rebound. We had some great interior passing yesterday. With the outside shooters we have killing it and the great post moves DJ, Lyles, Towns and WCS have been making teams are faced with not being able to react fast enough or decide which part of our offense
(outside shot or inside game) to not defend. Now with a growing understanding of how to play against zones this team becomes more unbeatable.
 
These analyses are very much appreciated. I noticed the result of the Ulis curl I just didn't catch on to why he was so wide open. I recall 4 such instance where he buried two threes and fed the post when someone decided it would be a good idea to challenge a50% 3 point shooter.

I agree this was UK's best game of the year. They dissected and demoralized a decent Bama team on their own floor. Interior big man passing and guard play was spectacular. I am getting to the point of astonishment when Booker hits anything but nylon. What a shooter!
 
I'm not nearly as much of a Basketball geek as you. It is great to read analysis from someone that is a pure BB geek.
 
Thanks for the break-down and analysis. I agree that this may be UK's best overall game of the season so far. The bigs were active, the guards were patient, and the team just seemed to play within itself. No one player took over the game or forced shots, they just took what the defense gave them.

I was also very happy to see GREAT defense. I liked what I saw yesterday on both ends of the floor.
 
Pascat, what is your basketball background? You know too much not to have been a coach...probably a pretty good one.
 
Originally posted by bigbluelou:
Pascat, what is your basketball background? You know too much not to have been a coach...probably a pretty good one.
My background is that I am a fan of the greatest basketball program of all time and a proud member of the best fan base in all of American sports. That explains 99% of it.

I have coached some high school basketball, but do not consider myself to be a coach.

I'm not doing anything special; DVR is an amazing thing. For years I've re-watched all of UK's games later in the evening. This year, I got the idea of assessing UK's offensive strategy. It's a great way to learn about the game.
 
Originally posted by jrm693:

I was at the game I believe I heard on the radio after game that two of Bamas starters got their 4th foul at the time they got the lead down to 9, then UK blowed it back open, so I am not sure that Grant panicked.
That explains the UK run, but it doesn't seem to explain why Grant would go to a press (which ended up drawing more fouls against Alabama). Again, perhaps the idea was to take pressure off the bigs and make it harder for UK to feed the post. But it backfired big time.
 
Originally posted by pascat:


Originally posted by bigbluelou:
Pascat, what is your basketball background? You know too much not to have been a coach...probably a pretty good one.
My background is that I am a fan of the greatest basketball program of all time and a proud member of the best fan base in all of American sports. That explains 99% of it.

I have coached some high school basketball, but do not consider myself to be a coach.

I'm not doing anything special; DVR is an amazing thing. For years I've re-watched all of UK's games later in the evening. This year, I got the idea of assessing UK's offensive strategy. It's a great way to learn about the game.
This cannot be true because I've always been told on this board that you have to either play or coach to have this much knowledge.
3dgrin.r191677.gif
 
I know this is a bit detailed, but this is the 1-4 offense UK ran yesterday down the stretch. By the time UK stretched the lead to 21, Grant switched back to a man-to-man, and Cal started running this. Lyles, Harrison, and Booker looked very comfortable running it and UK's bigs (already used to setting huge numbers of screens) were business as usual. Skip down to the "Georgetown" and "Hoya" offenses. The top few examples are more of a UCLA offense.



This post was edited on 1/18 5:54 PM by pascat

Georgetown 1-4
 
good job pascat. your in depth analysis is sure welcome here. these are my favorite threads, usually void of trolls and/or flamers. reminds me of il wildcat's sec previews. iu/duke '92 is also a great example of the 1-4. it helps having good point guards and we do.
 
Originally posted by hotelblue:
good job pascat. your in depth analysis is sure welcome here. these are my favorite threads, usually void of trolls and/or flamers. reminds me of il wildcat's sec previews. iu/duke '92 is also a great example of the 1-4. it helps having good point guards and we do.
Our guards are excellent. This team is so far ahead of last years team. I don't think we got it last year (offense wise) until the SEC tournament. Cal always says he coaches offense first cause kids don't like playing defense. This year we are playing defense from the jump. I love PASCAT's breakdown and analysis. With 2 platoons that have different strengths, this has got to be hard to defend and not get tired. GBB
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT