ADVERTISEMENT

UNC*** said they made a TYPO when they admitted academic fraud to SACS

A

anon_9qtxg60vqzy0y

Guest
https://www.yahoo.com/amphtml/sport...rassing-academic-fraud-defense-010926838.html

Carolina even changed its argument for the NCAA. When the school was in front of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools, which accredits it as an actual university, it declared that no show, no professor, no work classes were wrong.

“UNC reported to its accreditor that what occurred for nearly 18 years on its campus was academic fraud,” the NCAA report stated. ” … Specifically, UNC admitted [it] demonstrated that, ‘the academic fraud was long-standing.'”


Now, though, the classes weren’t fraud. They were fine. The NCAA was astounded. The Committee on Infractions asked how this was possible.

“UNC [told] the panel that it was merely a ‘typo’ or oversight,” the NCAA wrote.



A typo? At this point the case had become a My Cousin Vinny punchline … “I’m not Jerry Gallo … I’m Jerry Callo.”

What exactly was the typo that caused the school to write the term “academic fraud.” If you replace one letter do you get some other phrase? Maybe whomever does the typing in Chapel Hill is so inept it typo’d an entire phrase which, coincidentally, spelled out “academic fraud” in a case that wasn’t at all “academic fraud.”

Heck of a coincidence, dadgummit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MO_Blue
NCAA probably gave them the tip on how to cheat and lie so they can avoid NCAA punishment. The whole thing stinks worse than a ceiling in Minardi Hall.
 
I'm sure UNC will now go back to SACS and inform them that what they agreed to was a 'typo' and they really didn't mean it.

Shameless.

Unfortunately they know full well that SACS is nothing but a rubber stamp. There's no way that the organization would actually pull the accreditation of a school like UNC, regardless of what they do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: blubo
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT