1. We went pretty deep on the bench the last ten minutes, at least on defense.What happened?
Great post Hack and getting the youngsters reps takes precedence over perception!We went pret
1. We went pretty deep on the bench the last ten minutes, at least on defense.
Which is more important, increasing perception, or getting live game reps for some young folks?
I’ll admit the question is arguable, but I liked the idea of playing a lot of youngsters in the 4th. It lessons the risk of injury to your starters, and it probably lessons the risk of a player or two hitting the portal prematurely (prior to the staff asking him to hit the portal).
2. I hate to bitch about the referees in a blowout. but one drive was gift-wrapped for a Vandy touchdown. Replay clearly showed the ball loose from
the receiver’s grasp as he went out-of-bounds on a 40 yard bomb. Then they called a phantom PI in the end zone, putting the ball on the two yard line
Did we not have the ability to call a time-out and ask for a review on that bobbled catch? Poor "coaching" in my opinion....2. I hate to bitch about the referees in a blowout. but one drive was gift-wrapped for a Vandy touchdown. Replay clearly showed the ball loose from
the receiver’s grasp as he went out-of-bounds on a 40 yard bomb. Then they called a phantom PI in the end zone, putting the ball on the two yard line
Oregon's coach going in at 1/2 time up 35 - 0 said "we're not through"... I liked that attitude, and showed that perceptions in these polls play a huge roll...And seemingly let off the gas. What happened? If we finish strong and end up winning by 4 TDs I think the perception of this team is much different today.
Eh…Ky was an offensive mess 2nd and 3rd qtr…that is the negative taste in most mouthsAnd seemingly let off the gas. What happened? If we finish strong and end up winning by 4 TDs I think the perception of this team is much different today.
My understanding is we had the ability to call a timeout to give the conference office longer to look at it.Did we not have the ability to call a time-out and ask for a review on that bobbled catch? Poor "coaching" in my opinion....
If we played more fast paste, we’d see that huge roll . . . jelly is my preference.I liked that attitude, and showed that perceptions in these polls play a huge roll...
He did, Stoops went nuts when they wouldnt review itDid we not have the ability to call a time-out and ask for a review on that bobbled catch? Poor "coaching" in my opinion....
Okay, I concede that if a time-out was called (I just didn't remember that...) then I swallow my opinion...!He did, Stoops went nuts when they wouldnt review it
We're not through then proceeded to play to a 7-6 half time score. Coach speakOregon's coach going in at 1/2 time up 35 - 0 said "we not through"... I liked that attitude, and showed that perceptions in these polls play a huge roll...
It's also a mind-set that attention to detail is important throughout the entire game ....
Classic StoopsAnd seemingly let off the gas. What happened? If we finish strong and end up winning by 4 TDs I think the perception of this team is much different today.
---Oregon's coach going in at 1/2 time up 35 - 0 said "we not through"... I liked that attitude, and showed that perceptions in these polls play a huge roll...
It's also a mind-set that attention to detail is important throughout the entire game ....
I dunno'.... I mean the score was 42 - 0 until the last 2+ minutes, so....maybe he got exactly what he wanted from his Offense & Defense up to that point.... for public perception... ?? Seems like a pretty good ass whipping' of a ranked team getting all kinds of publicity...---
That didn't age well at all, now did it? You might try a little "attention to detail" by waiting for the game to be over before making goofy comments.