Has Fox, Monk, Adebayo, Briscoe and Humphries all gone. If so, next year is going to be a major question mark.
Buy yay, Tai Wynyard is coming back!
We are that size whether Bamba comes or not. Richards is 6"11.Some of you need to just relax about the dooms day next year predictions. If UK gets Bamba they will go
6'1
6'6
6'8
6'8
7'0
in the starting lineup. It will be athletic and long and teams will have fits trying to put the ball in the basket. UK will be a elite defensive team and will have to hit jump shots to beat them.
"That part about repetition in games...."Not sure why Humphries would leave coming off his best game at Kentucky.
I think Briscoe has hit his ceiling here. He is such a "tweener"... not skilled enough to play PG in the league & to small & medioce a shooter to play the two. He will have a nice career over seas & is ready to leave school & play for pay it seems.
Hope the writer is wrong and Hump stays. Great kid off the court and could have a nice season coming up.
They need a NCAA punishment tracker.Hey, why doesn't the Louisville paper have an "NBA Decision Tracker" for UofL?
Oh, wait, I remember why....
Briscoe ain't coming back . He will make the NBA but he will be an NBADLer for while before hand. The rest should be back. HUmp ain't going no where as he is a borderline 2nd rounder and would be a lock to be drafted if he came back . Gabriel won't leave if he wants to be drafted . We are going to add maybe our best overall class top to bottom and that includes Bamba and another guard like Smith but it wont include Knox since Gabriel will be back and that is a good thing as it is better to have some experience then just one more talented freshman. A line up ofIt's really hard to win an NCAA title after losing 9 scholarship players and without an extremely special class.
I'm never worried about the talent coming in. It's the supplement parts that have made a difference in the UK teams who have been very good/great.
It's a pipe dream, but just getting Briscoe, Gabriel, Humphries and SKJ back, along with 5 or 6 very good recruits, I'll take that.
You're thinking about the wrong kind of leaving with Hump. He is considering a transfer. I'm sure his heart wants to stay here but it may not make any business sense to do so.Briscoe ain't coming back . He will make the NBA but he will be an NBADLer for while before hand. The rest should be back. HUmp ain't going no where as he is a borderline 2nd rounder and would be a lock to be drafted if he came back . Gabriel won't leave if he wants to be drafted . We are going to add maybe our best overall class top to bottom and that includes Bamba and another guard like Smith but it wont include Knox since Gabriel will be back and that is a good thing as it is better to have some experience then just one more talented freshman. A line up of
Green
Diallo
Vanderbilt
Washington
Bamba
with Alexander,A guard like Smith , Gabriel , Hump , Richards coming off the bench and that is a top 3ish team .
Yeah I don't think Hump is thinking draft. He's thinking about going somewhere that will feature a big man with his skill set. Is it strange to think he would be a good fit somewhere like Gonzaga?
Hawks sophomore year u had twins, booker and ulis. No pt. He maybe should have got more last year but his shooting was awful up until end of this season."That part about repetition in games...."
According to the writer and I totally agree. Same reason Matthews left, same reason Willis and Hawkins probably should have left. You learn through "repetition in games and Cal obviously agrees with this, but only if you're a 5-star projected lottery pick or your name is Briscoe. At the end of the year, Hawkins was a much better player than Briscoe; imagine if he had been given 1/3 of the minutes that Briscoe was getting during his sophomore and junior years. He would have easily been UK's version of Frank Mason. Matthews would have been a star by this junior year. And Humphries certainly would have been a force next year. None of the incoming bigs has the size and strength of Humphries. If Humphries had been given the opportunity to develop, imagine him, Bam and Willis on the front line during the UCLA game. But no, we needed Briscoe in a 3-guard line-up with one shooter I guess.
At the end of the year, Hawkins was a much better player than Briscoe; imagine if he had been given 1/3 of the minutes that Briscoe was getting during his sophomore and junior years. He would have easily been UK's version of Frank Mason. Matthews would have been a star by this junior year. And Humphries certainly would have been a force next year. None of the incoming bigs has the size and strength of Humphries. If Humphries had been given the opportunity to develop, imagine him, Bam and Willis on the front line during the UCLA game. But no, we needed Briscoe in a 3-guard line-up with one shooter I guess.
Would not be surprised to see Hump make it to the NBA this year. Some of the scouts liked his play last year when Cal had all the scouts there to watch the players. Some said he was the 3rd best player on the team. Or maybe this was 2 years ago.
A big 7ft guy who can shoot can make it in the NBA.
Would not be surprised to see Hump make it to the NBA this year. Some of the scouts liked his play last year when Cal had all the scouts there to watch the players. Some said he was the 3rd best player on the team. Or maybe this was 2 years ago.
A big 7ft guy who can shoot can make it in the NBA.
"That part about repetition in games...."
According to the writer and I totally agree. Same reason Matthews left, same reason Willis and Hawkins probably should have left. You learn through "repetition in games and Cal obviously agrees with this, but only if you're a 5-star projected lottery pick or your name is Briscoe. At the end of the year, Hawkins was a much better player than Briscoe; imagine if he had been given 1/3 of the minutes that Briscoe was getting during his sophomore and junior years. He would have easily been UK's version of Frank Mason. Matthews would have been a star by this junior year. And Humphries certainly would have been a force next year. None of the incoming bigs has the size and strength of Humphries. If Humphries had been given the opportunity to develop, imagine him, Bam and Willis on the front line during the UCLA game. But no, we needed Briscoe in a 3-guard line-up with one shooter I guess.
Is this a real post?
Hump in the NBA this year? Really????
No returning contributors = no shot at national title. Has never happened in history of NCAA basketball and won't happen next year.
Talented and successful team for sure, but not title winning caliber, IMO.
Not sure why Humphries would leave coming off his best game at Kentucky.
I think Briscoe has hit his ceiling here. He is such a "tweener"... not skilled enough to play PG in the league & to small & medioce a shooter to play the two. He will have a nice career over seas & is ready to leave school & play for pay it seems.
Because he rotted on the bench all year...he doesnt want to do that again...kids want to play
because he was terrible all year.
He got yanked everytime he made a mistake....cant play basketball that way...need freedom on the court
Much more likely than isiah.Is this a real post?
Hump in the NBA this year? Really????
No returning contributors = no shot at national title. Has never happened in history of NCAA basketball and won't happen next year.
Talented and successful team for sure, but not title winning caliber, IMO.
Cool. Does that mean I get to read your posts reminding us we don't have a real shot at the title for the next 11 months?
No returning contributors = no shot at national title. Has never happened in history of NCAA basketball and won't happen next year.
Talented and successful team for sure, but not title winning caliber, IMO.
He got yanked everytime he made a mistake....cant play basketball that way...need freedom on the court