NCAA releases first NET rankings
- Thread starter JFCats22
- Start date
I'm fine with it, but I still don't get how Duke can be ahead of Kansas and Kentucky.. both of whom beat Duke, and both of which are undefeated. I wonder if it's their SOS to date that's helping them. But it's a pretty flawed metric to have a team thats already at 2 losses, be ranked 4th.
I don't know how the NET works, but Florida that high, and Kansas that low?
Me either. That win will pay off all year for seeding purposes.
I can't imagine what the season long Duke and Flagg hype would be if Duke had beaten UK and Kansas. Ugh. But, I guess, if that were the case, it would probably be warranted. To an extent.
For everyone saying Clemson is gonna be a cakewalk well they’re 18 in net and 25 in kenpom. And a true road game. I’ll be tickled to death to walk away with a 1 point win
I mean this honestly, has there ever been a single one of these rankings that has ranked UK HIGHER than we expect/believe? I can't recall a single one, maybe a few of Cal's recent years did they give us the benefit of the doubt. But it seems KU and Duke consistently get some weird bump up, probably due to some odd metric.
Like, I don't believe we are the #1 team in the nation.. but hell, if we have the highest scoring offense, 2nd in point differential, 3rd in rebounds, have the best 3pt shooter in the nation.. and there's a team at 4th, with 2 losses, who we BEAT.. then maybe it's not outlandish to think we're #1. (Our defense is probably what holds us back, somewhere in the 120s, but I have a feeling that's due to us taking our foot off the gas in a bunch of games we had wrapped up with 8-10 min left)
IDK, just Monday morning rants while I avoid my actual work lol.
Like, I don't believe we are the #1 team in the nation.. but hell, if we have the highest scoring offense, 2nd in point differential, 3rd in rebounds, have the best 3pt shooter in the nation.. and there's a team at 4th, with 2 losses, who we BEAT.. then maybe it's not outlandish to think we're #1. (Our defense is probably what holds us back, somewhere in the 120s, but I have a feeling that's due to us taking our foot off the gas in a bunch of games we had wrapped up with 8-10 min left)
IDK, just Monday morning rants while I avoid my actual work lol.
These will change a lot in the coming months. I don’t put much trust in them at this point. But how is Auburn not #1?
If we can take care of business this week by beating Clemson and Gonzaga, our resume would be stellar.
If we can take care of business this week by beating Clemson and Gonzaga, our resume would be stellar.
It seems reasonable.
Kenpom has it as Auburn 1 UT 2 but I think an argument can be made either way.
Tenn has knocked off Baylor, Louisville and Virginia .....the latter two by 20+ and Baylor double digits. They smashed everyone they were supposed to smash as well
Auburn has definitely had the harder schedule. They had the two biggest wins over Iowa St and Houston between the two teams but those games were only by 5 and 2. NET kind of looks at those games for what they were.......games that could have gone either way. Obviously when seeding comes into play, the wins are already on the board and will be huge for them. But NET factors in efficiency margin which does matter when predicting the strength of teams.
I guess if one doesn't take into account scoring margin obviously Auburn has to be 1. But NET factors that in. Which is why this makes sense.
FWIW since Kenpom follows Vegas lines pretty closely, currently Auburn would be a 1 point favorite to UT on a neutral court. The difference right now between the two according to most systems is minimal.
