ADVERTISEMENT

The SEC is going to distribute Over $31 Million this year Per School

Feb 19, 2003
5,101
672
113
The Money now in College Athletics is Staggering:

The Southeastern Conference will distribute $435 million out of an NCAA-record $455 million in revenues between its 14 institutions, sources told ESPN on Friday.

Each league member will receive $31.07 million -- an increase of more than $10 million per school from last year's payout of $20.9 million per school.

http://espn.go.com/college-sports/s...distribute-record-435m-revenue-member-schools
 
That's insane. Hopefully, we continue to build our brand in football and Cal stay's 10 more years.
 
It is a Game Changer...$31 Million in the First Year of the SEC Network...this is just the Tip of the Ice Berg...you have no "Power 5" it is a Power 2-(The SEC & B1G) and the Middle Class 3-(ACC, Big XII & Pac 12)
 
Maybe they can afford to change the K in the new logo back to an the original K now. Ha.
 
Sounds like the SEC Network is a raging success. One year, and the SEC is producing record-breaking numbers.
 
For those of you who care (haha) and follow some of my posts, I made the statement that the SEC network was going to be a game changer for UK. It is not only going to be a big financial boost, but as I have been saying all along it will change the recruiting world for UK. I was specificly thinking Ohio, Pennsylvania and the eastern seaboard states including New Jersey. I think everyone can see it is happening. UK was an unknown to people in these states. But showing off the SEC and seeing Kentucky was so close to these kids has happened. It took efforts by the new staff - most certainly - but they took advantage of all of this marketing too. That is why Coach Stoops wanted and knew this was a great place to come too. It hasn't been proven on the field - yet - but I fully believe from year 5 on UK will be a program to reckoned with! Michigan State was and is worried for a reason about UK football's program. They have to do everything they can to stop UK's momentum - but it's too late for them IMO!

Go Big Blue!
 
The school will benefit. The Athletic Dept at UK does a ton of good for the academics at the school.
 
Right.

That isn't counting the $30,000,000 contract they just recently signed for the ancillary rights or whatever it is called.

You can see the effects already, since the NCAA decided to allow schools to pay their players legally mitch or someone decided that players can live in Lexington for about half of what it costs to live in Louisville (or Knoxville, or Auburn), wonder what genius figured that out? .Maybe the profs on the appeals board? And mitch or someone decided that we could do away with 6,000 screaming fans because the big wheels in their soundproofed boxes could bring in more money to a starving program------well, they couldn't afford to replace the two years obsolete scoreboards OR the folding chairs in the "recruiting room" (what a joke AND disgrace that was) until years after they were scheduled to be replaced so they must have been broke, and why invest in football, basketball and the minor sports is where the money is, LOL.

Yes, things are really looking up for football at UK, (I believe that, by the way) LUCKY to chance into a coach and a great staff IMO, but when you look at the FACT that UK football was primarily responsible for financing the huge loan for Commonwealth and got about HALF the money you really have to wonder (NOT that I don't think UK's primary purpose should be education) about why they couldn't finance half that much on their own much earlier? And most of the stadium improvements are just to increase the revenue football can bring in. I know, I know, huge amounts of money coming in now, but where did the $5,000,000 BONUS from the new TV contract about five years ago go to, and with UK football bringing in an $18,000,000 profit at the same time (operating expenses about the same as for 13 basketball players) while basketball cleared about $5,000,000 wonder why they thought they couldn't afford to replace the folding chairs in the "recruiting room" OR finance the new scoreboards when they were supposed to be replaced.

Check out A&M's $400,000,000 renovation just for the stadium (Increased seating, by the way, now largest in the SEC), with Arkansas and California spending about the same for all their sports programs.

We are on the rise, but still decades behind the football powers------I don't know about you but I know who to blame at least one of those decades on, and we aren't really gaining any ground, MSU is passing us up in football capacity and apparently the city college will soon.

But the dumbest thing lately IMO is the NCAA allowing schools to buy their players and we come in as a low bidder for their services. Typical.

And a sad commentary that UK doesn't learn very fast, IMO. Transfer U, TU, Auburn, etc already have huge advantages from bending every rule possible and here we have a chance to "buy" players legally (yes, they are bought in a lot of cases) and do our typical flop for football.

Sorry about all the sour grapes, but this latest inequity is absurd.
 
Last edited:
It is a Game Changer...$31 Million in the First Year of the SEC Network...this is just the Tip of the Ice Berg...you have no "Power 5" it is a Power 2-(The SEC & B1G) and the Middle Class 3-(ACC, Big XII & Pac 12)[/QUOTE?
Guess we can now afford to go after the players in Miami that Otis was getting and suddenly dried up misteriously after CS and honest Hurtt left
 
For those of you who care (haha) and follow some of my posts, I made the statement that the SEC network was going to be a game changer for UK. It is not only going to be a big financial boost, but as I have been saying all along it will change the recruiting world for UK. I was specificly thinking Ohio, Pennsylvania and the eastern seaboard states including New Jersey. I think everyone can see it is happening. UK was an unknown to people in these states. But showing off the SEC and seeing Kentucky was so close to these kids has happened. It took efforts by the new staff - most certainly - but they took advantage of all of this marketing too. That is why Coach Stoops wanted and knew this was a great place to come too. It hasn't been proven on the field - yet - but I fully believe from year 5 on UK will be a program to reckoned with! Michigan State was and is worried for a reason about UK football's program. They have to do everything they can to stop UK's momentum - but it's too late for them IMO!

Go Big Blue!

Your post points out some excellent facts that should be pretty obvious but are often overlooked, thanks.
 
Right.

That isn't counting the $30,000,000 contract they just recently signed for the ancillary rights or whatever it is called.

You can see the effects already, since the NCAA decided to allow schools to pay their players legally mitch or someone decided that players can live in Lexington for about half of what it costs to live in Louisville (or Knoxville, or Auburn), wonder what genius figured that out? .Maybe the profs on the appeals board? And mitch or someone decided that we could do away with 6,000 screaming fans because the big wheels in their soundproofed boxes could bring in more money to a starving program------well, they couldn't afford to replace the two years obsolete scoreboards OR the folding chairs in the "recruiting room" (what a joke AND disgrace that was) until years after they were scheduled to be replaced so they must have been broke, and why invest in football, basketball and the minor sports is where the money is, LOL.

Yes, things are really looking up for football at UK, (I believe that, by the way) LUCKY to chance into a coach and a great staff IMO, but when you look at the FACT that UK football was primarily responsible for financing the huge loan for Commonwealth and got about HALF the money you really have to wonder (NOT that I don't think UK's primary purpose should be education) about why they couldn't finance half that much on their own much earlier? And most of the stadium improvements are just to increase the revenue football can bring in. I know, I know, huge amounts of money coming in now, but where did the $5,000,000 BONUS from the new TV contract about five years ago go to, and with UK football bringing in an $18,000,000 profit at the same time (operating expenses about the same as for 13 basketball players) while basketball cleared about $5,000,000 wonder why they thought they couldn't afford to replace the folding chairs in the "recruiting room" OR finance the new scoreboards when they were supposed to be replaced.

Check out A&M's $400,000,000 renovation just for the stadium (Increased seating, by the way, now largest in the SEC), with Arkansas and California spending about the same for all their sports programs.

We are on the rise, but still decades behind the football powers------I don't know about you but I know who to blame at least one of those decades on, and we aren't really gaining any ground, MSU is passing us up in football capacity and apparently the city college will soon.

But the dumbest thing lately IMO is the NCAA allowing schools to buy their players and we come in as a low bidder for their services. Typical.

And a sad commentary that UK doesn't learn very fast, IMO. Transfer U, TU, Auburn, etc already have huge advantages from bending every rule possible and here we have a chance to "buy" players legally (yes, they are bought in a lot of cases) and do our typical flop for football.

Sorry about all the sour grapes, but this latest inequity is absurd.

jauk, you obviously don't realize that the "true cost of attendance" figures aren't set by the athletics department, they are taken from the financial aid office and determined by federal guidelines and is data that is shared and published to all students. There are many schools who's athletics departments who don't like the current formula because of the inconsistencies from school to school. UK is paying what it can based upon the current rules. If and when...and they will change...UK is perfectly willing to pay the max allowable.

Even Nick Saban doesn't like it. as Auburn's COA is about $3000 higher than Alabama's...

In the Southeastern Conference, Tennessee and Auburn will be giving their athletes about $5,500 more on top of a scholarship that pays for tuition, room and board, and books.

On the other end, schools such as Alabama, Texas A&M and Georgia will be giving their athletes about $3,000 less. Those numbers are determined by financial aid offices following federal guidelines, and individual students can petition a school for more money.

“The calculation of it has nothing to do with college athletics,” Auburn athletic director Jay Jacobs said Wednesday at the SEC spring meetings.

So go on with your rant ja...I know you never let the facts get in the way.
 
It means to me that No SEC or B1G needs to ask their Students on Dime to help fund Athletics...it also means to me those two leagues should have a Higher Recruiting Budget then Schools in the Big XII, ACC and Pac 12...the SEC and B1G have a Huge Cash advantage over everyone
 
It means to me that No SEC or B1G needs to ask their Students on Dime to help fund Athletics...it also means to me those two leagues should have a Higher Recruiting Budget then Schools in the Big XII, ACC and Pac 12...the SEC and B1G have a Huge Cash advantage over everyone

Except Louisville, since they are the most profitable athletic department in the world. :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: optimus-blue
Does that mean Cal gets another raise?


Hmmm are you saying that a coach who has one of our programs competing for championships practically every year since he has been here not worthy of his pay check??

I find it disturbing that so many are envious Of the basketball
Program and bash it constantly instead of trying to embrace it. How come CWS is not sold out every game? Rupp always leads the nation in attendance.
The basketball team turns a profit and it would be a much higher profit if the university owned Rupp.
 
Kentucky football is credited with bringing in SIGNIFICANTLY more revenue than the basketball program. UK's athletics budget for the 14-15 school year was $117.7 million. UK projected basketball revenue would be $22.5 million while football was projected at $31.8 million. Looking at projected expenditures, men's basketball was at $16.5 million while football came in at $13 million. So for basketball, the difference between revenue/expenditure was only $6 million while the football difference was $18.8 million.

Point being, yes, the basketball program turns a very nice profit. If UK's projections were right though, that profit is about a third of the football programs.

GBB!!!
 
With the Boost from going from the AAC to the ACC We shouldn't do it either

Nonsense, jurich has to have all the money he can get to keep the ship afloat. Why, he had to give BP about a 400% raise to get him when no other legit University in the country wanted him, then he had to give him a $500,000 bonus for the football players making the minimum grades to stay eligible-----when BP really had nothing to do with it. And how much does BP make now, not enough apparently, he had to embarrass UL with the court case because he couldn't keep his side piece happy. But things like that are getting to be the norm at UL.

What in the world do you think UL is known for now, surely not their academic school.
 
  • Like
Reactions: midniter
Nonsense, jurich has to have all the money he can get to keep the ship afloat. Why, he had to give BP about a 400% raise to get him when no other legit University in the country wanted him, then he had to give him a $500,000 bonus for the football players making the minimum grades to stay eligible-----when BP really had nothing to do with it. And how much does BP make now, not enough apparently, he had to embarrass UL with the court case because he couldn't keep his side piece happy. But things like that are getting to be the norm at UL.

What in the world do you think UL is known for now, surely not their academic school.

Jauk...the old BIG EAST/AAC Payout was roughly $6 Million Per School...the Projected Payout from the ACC should be around $22 Million...that is a $16 Million increase...as far as Petrino salary it is $3.5 Million...a Bargin for a Coach as CBS Dennis Dodd pointed out has won at least 9 Games a year in 6 out of the 9 years as a Head College Football Coach including Back to Back Double Digit winning seasons in the SEC West with appearances in Two New Years Six Bowls-(Cotton Bowl)...not counting a 3rd New Years Six Bowl Appearance and win at Louisville with the Orange Bowl.

With that being said Students at the P5 Level Schools shouldn't have to pay a dime to help fund Athletics
 
Last edited:
I was tossing these numbers around at work with some UL fans and they didn't believe me. Of course at the time they were just projections so it's hard to blame them for being skeptical of such a crazy one year jump. In the next 2-3 years the expected payouts are expected to reach 50 mill per school. It's going to be an embarrassment of riches. It won't even be fair the insane advantage the SEC will have on other conferences. UK will never have an excuse for not having state-of-the-art football facilities again

I think you've started to see the SEC take basketball more seriously with the added revenue allowing them to increase spending there without taking it from football. Hiring Howland, Barnes, and Pearl is a start. There's been a serious uptick in Bball recruiting in the conference recently. I expect the SEC to reach respectability soon. There's always been a lot of talent in the south it's just a matter of the schools taking the sport seriously and making a commitment
 
I was tossing these numbers around at work with some UL fans and they didn't believe me. Of course at the time they were just projections so it's hard to blame them for being skeptical of such a crazy one year jump. In the next 2-3 years the expected payouts are expected to reach 50 mill per school. It's going to be an embarrassment of riches. It won't even be fair the insane advantage the SEC will have on other conferences. UK will never have an excuse for not having state-of-the-art football facilities again

I think you've started to see the SEC take basketball more seriously with the added revenue allowing them to increase spending there without taking it from football. Hiring Howland, Barnes, and Pearl is a start. There's been a serious uptick in Bball recruiting in the conference recently. I expect the SEC to reach respectability soon. There's always been a lot of talent in the south it's just a matter of the schools taking the sport seriously and making a commitment

Fact of the matter is this...the B1G and the SEC are going to vastly outpace the other P5 Leagues with the SECN and BTN...also the B1G TV Rights are coming up very soon
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT