IMO however improvement must be shown every year and improvement next year should at a minimum be at least a break even season with a minor bowl bid. I hope for better but that would be minimum to sustain the upward mobility of UK football. I agree there should not be idiots asking for Stoops head before the end of at least his fifth or sixth season but IMO progress must be maintained to keep the football program on track.Originally posted by CoachR35:
Yes, we're heading into year three, but to me that's irrelevant. I'm more interested in the years where the entire team is fielded by CMS recruits. I think he made huge improvements from year one to year two with mediocre talent. Turning this program around, with sustainability, is a long-term deal. It won't happen within three years.
Stoops and Elliot in particular have a great record of developing talent at FSU. In 2014 FSU put more defensive players in the draft than any other team. Dawson has a pretty good record at Wva and most of our other coaches have had some success along the way. Where this staff lacked the last couple of years IMO is at the QB position, becasue we had no coach on the staff that had every played the position. With Dawson we have an opportunity to see some improvement there.Originally posted by jte123:
Can this staff and mark stoops develop players, this is the only way we will truly improve in the SEC. We are going into year three, thoughts?
I have always really liked the kid and how he was an ambassador for UK football after he committed. I was even willing to overlook his first brush with the law because we all do foolish things every now and then. But this last fiasco has me questioning his leadership abilities. While I understand they were doing nothing anything any different than any other college-aged boys, he still put himself before the team and the school. A true leader needs to be able to influence both on and off the field.Originally posted by Catfanlou:
The other question is whether Stoops and Co can control players. The repeat dumb mistakes by Barker and Baker are of real concern. Barker is who is going to lead us into the future? Not sure of that anymore. Not sure he cares enough about anyone other than himself and is the right person to lead other young men
Oh come on, you are almost as old as me, surely you can't remember anything that long ago.Originally posted by C1180:
I will wait until all of this story unfolds before making judgment on Barker but I definitely wouldn't want my QB and leader leading other players into such situations if this is what happened. I know alcohol will cause young people to get into bad situations. I speak from experience having been in a few bad situation because of alcohol when I was a young pup.
Good post! I agree with what you are saying, but it's hard for me to define "significant improvement" on wins and losses. I like to see how we compete in every game against the big boys and the little boys. For instance, the Florida game last year was "loss", but we easily should have won that game as it came down to the very end (and then some).Originally posted by southindycat:
You will start getting your answer this year.
Guys like Ramsey Meyers and Regie Meant will now be RS sophomores. Hatcher, Timmons, McWilson, McClain and others will be a juniors. It is altogether reasonable to start to talking about serious performance expectations for these guys and others in their position. They will be draft eligible at the end of the season.
However, they are the tip of the spear (other than JUCOs, already cycling out of the program) in terms of veteran players that this staff "owns". Others correctly observe that we cannot expect to really reap the harvest until the staff has some of its kids leaving the program after 5th years... 2017. However, 2015 will still be a season in which the staff finally has third year players it recruited. If we do not see significant improvement this season, I will start to grow concerned.
What is "significant improvement"? IMHO, 7-5 overall/ 4-0 non-conference/ 3-5 SEC, go compete well in bowl game, and hopefully bring home some minor hardware.
Well, while I'm sure many will disagree, I think they have done a very marginal job with the QB position. I believe Dawson has more true experience coaching/developing QBs than did Brown.Originally posted by jte123:
Can this staff and mark stoops develop players, this is the only way we will truly improve in the SEC. We are going into year three, thoughts?