ADVERTISEMENT

Some interesting names have worked with Scangarello at QB Collective

Hank Backmeier at Idaho State
Brock Vandagriff at Georgia
Caleb Williams at Oklahoma
Garrett Nussmeier at LSU
Drake Maye at North Carolina
Jake Garcia at Miami
Malache Nelson soon to be at Southern Cal
Yes. That's the good news.

The not so good news is that UK is currently 83rd in the nation in total offense and 126th in sacks allowed.

In many ways, the situation at UK is tailor made for a talented QB to transfer in and win the 2023 starting job. People know what Levis has accompished at UK, and there is an implication that another transfer QB can take advantage of the same deal next year. But the other piece is that potential transfers will need to believe that UK represents their best alternative now. Transfers generally bring a year or two of eligibility. Not always. But if they are younger than that, they aren't proven commodities. Levis wasn't exactly a proven commidity, but everyone can see the NFL arm talent. When Levis came in, our OL was a team strength. That has changed. But, of course, our receivers have improved. Another transfer will need to believe he can be successful immediately. This will get interesting.

I believe our OL can be a team strength again, but Goodwin, Bingham, and Young have to be involved. That means development. Selling a transfer QB for 2023 probably isn't going to be as easy this time as it was with Levis. There will be a lot of competition for the good ones.
 
Would love to see Vandergriff & Nussmeier face some live bullets this season. Don't like the idea of counting on someone who hasn't actually played CFB.
How much had Levis actually played other than being a Wildcat QB at PSU?
 
  • Like
Reactions: josh72484
Threw 47 passes in 2019, 55 in 2020, started 1 game. Showed enough on film for Coen to tell Stoops "I can build an offense around this"

We won't be lucky enough to find another physical specimen the caliber of will Levis. Let's be honest though, Levis was as lucky to find us. He had incredible physical skills but 0 understanding of the position. He's still learning but improving rapidly. He came here and learned under two of the top NFL QB coaches and ran the top NFL offense. No way he is in position to be #1 overall if he goes anywhere else.

That said, we very well could be in better shape next year at QB if we choose the right fit. It's very unlikely we'll have such a physical talent but almost certainly will have someone with a much higher understanding of the position. With all the skill talent we have, all we need is a skilled distributor.
 
I really think we should take two transfers because if we have to play Sheron or Hogan extended snaps we're in trouble, as we've already seen. I know Sheron is inexperienced but he doesn't have the arm talent to excel in this system.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TysonD44 and K_TIME
Can't take 2 QB transfers. The portal door swings both ways. We do that and our 4* 2022 qb signee Wade leaves - and takes his star LB twin brother who is playing this season with him. Plus our only top 2024 QB target O'Neil probably would be turned off on such a move.
 
Can't take 2 QB transfers. The portal door swings both ways. We do that and our 4* 2022 qb signee Wade leaves - and takes his star LB twin brother who is playing this season with him. Plus our only top 2024 QB target O'Neil probably would be turned off on such a move.
Speaking of Wade…anyone heard how the staff feels about his potential as a future starter?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mattrudd
I’ve heard it’s nussmeier. But I’m not an insider.
If it is, I'd be pretty damn happy. He's a very solid QB, has a good arm and seems to play under control. He isn't particularly mobile or elusive though, so OL play will have to improve. But I have no doubt the guy could come in and run this offense and likely run it very well.

I would obviously be quite happy with the Vandagriff kid at Georgia too. He may actually have a bit higher potential ceiling than Nussmeier, though Nussmeier seems to be a little more polished right now. But all most of us have to go on is high school highlights and spring game/scrimmage footage at the college level.

I'm sure most of the other guys mentioned would also be quality additions. Drake Maye at UNC is actually the guy listed that reminds me most of Levis. He's a big, physical guy that has a nice arm and can also move pretty well.
 
Out of 7 games, how many have we had a "great rb" playing? Sorry, facts are pesky things.

Let's even take it a step further. out of 7 games, how many has Coach Scan had the:
Starting QB
Starting RB
Starting LT
Starting RT
3 of the 4 games Rodriguez was out was against terrible teams. That’s not an excuse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: seccats04
3 of the 4 games Rodriguez was out was against terrible teams. That’s not an excuse.
Definitely not P5, but the other three were not all awful teams. We lost three starters on the OL, had no OL rotation last year, have a new blocking scheme, have big ol boys who were brought in as brawlers trying to switch to outside zone, and a brand new OC who worked as a position coach in the NFL.

Not having CRod definitely hurt. I'm not saying we're a Superbowl quality team but in hindsight, there was a lot that had to go right this year on offense for us to have the season we (or at least I) was hoping for. Coen would've been much better, but even he called some bone headed, head-scratching plays in his year here. He admitted as much many times.

Coen also tried switching the line's blocking scheme. That hurt our offensive production.
I don't think Scan is the caliber of OC we thought he would be. I have yelled at my screen so damn much because of his play calling... but whether he can grow into the role will be determined in the next few weeks. I'll reserve judgement until I can see how he evolves as a play caller this season. Maybe he'll really get the hang of it by the end like Coen did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JC-3 and Jim Sauer
Yes. That's the good news.

The not so good news is that UK is currently 83rd in the nation in total offense and 126th in sacks allowed.

In many ways, the situation at UK is tailor made for a talented QB to transfer in and win the 2023 starting job. People know what Levis has accompished at UK, and there is an implication that another transfer QB can take advantage of the same deal next year. But the other piece is that potential transfers will need to believe that UK represents their best alternative now. Transfers generally bring a year or two of eligibility. Not always. But if they are younger than that, they aren't proven commodities. Levis wasn't exactly a proven commidity, but everyone can see the NFL arm talent. When Levis came in, our OL was a team strength. That has changed. But, of course, our receivers have improved. Another transfer will need to believe he can be successful immediately. This will get interesting.

I believe our OL can be a team strength again, but Goodwin, Bingham, and Young have to be involved. That means development. Selling a transfer QB for 2023 probably isn't going to be as easy this time as it was with Levis. There will be a lot of competition for the good ones.
I don’t think that potential transfers will have a problem seeing a line that should be improved, our center will be one of the best, IMO. The WR and TE corps will be outstanding and a pro style offense will help them prepare for the NFL. I am not sure they will see premiere RB talent on paper, but I think those other pieces will be most important.

The back half of the season has some brutal challenges, but I think the offense should be improving during this time. Liam’s offense was sharper in the second half of the season, for the most part. Scang’s offense is still a bit new to them.

If Manning stays healthy, I think he could make a name for himself over the stretch. We would benefit greatly from another OL getting drafted. That may entice the right transfer to join the team. I like Flax coming back, but think we could still use a seasoned OT.
 
Yes. That's the good news.

The not so good news is that UK is currently 83rd in the nation in total offense and 126th in sacks allowed.

In many ways, the situation at UK is tailor made for a talented QB to transfer in and win the 2023 starting job. People know what Levis has accompished at UK, and there is an implication that another transfer QB can take advantage of the same deal next year. But the other piece is that potential transfers will need to believe that UK represents their best alternative now. Transfers generally bring a year or two of eligibility. Not always. But if they are younger than that, they aren't proven commodities. Levis wasn't exactly a proven commidity, but everyone can see the NFL arm talent. When Levis came in, our OL was a team strength. That has changed. But, of course, our receivers have improved. Another transfer will need to believe he can be successful immediately. This will get interesting.

I believe our OL can be a team strength again, but Goodwin, Bingham, and Young have to be involved. That means development. Selling a transfer QB for 2023 probably isn't going to be as easy this time as it was with Levis. There will be a lot of competition for the good ones.
Don’t sleep on Hall and Rodriguez. I’ve been told the staff is high on them .
 
Definitely not P5, but the other three were not all awful teams. We lost three starters on the OL, had no OL rotation last year, have a new blocking scheme, have big ol boys who were brought in as brawlers trying to switch to outside zone, and a brand new OC who worked as a position coach in the NFL.

Not having CRod definitely hurt. I'm not saying we're a Superbowl quality team but in hindsight, there was a lot that had to go right this year on offense for us to have the season we (or at least I) was hoping for. Coen would've been much better, but even he called some bone headed, head-scratching plays in his year here. He admitted as much many times.

Coen also tried switching the line's blocking scheme. That hurt our offensive production.
I don't think Scan is the caliber of OC we thought he would be. I have yelled at my screen so damn much because of his play calling... but whether he can grow into the role will be determined in the next few weeks. I'll reserve judgement until I can see how he evolves as a play caller this season. Maybe he'll really get the hang of it by the end like Coen did.
NIU is 2-6 and Miami OH is 3-5……both in bottom tier of MAC. I’d say they’re terrible and we still struggled against them.
 
Speaking of Wade…anyone heard how the staff feels about his potential as a future starter?
Supposedly…….we had a package prepared for him against South Carolina that we had worked on all week but when we botched the first play of the game we decided to go into a cocoon and not try to score the remainder of the game . Because everyone knows being down 7-0 means you must change your entire game plan .
 
Can't take 2 QB transfers. The portal door swings both ways. We do that and our 4* 2022 qb signee Wade leaves - and takes his star LB twin brother who is playing this season with him. Plus our only top 2024 QB target O'Neil probably would be turned off on such a move.
This.right.here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mattrudd and JHB4UK
The McVey Shanahan system doesn't need a mobile guy. Both Coen & Scan say they want a point guard, a smart guy to sit in pocket & distribute the ball to the playmakers.
Unless you are running the wishbone or the veer, arm talent is a prerequisite for a successful quarterback. But all other things being equal, an athletic quarterback who can flee the backfield and run past the second level is always better than an immobile quarterback because defenses have to account for a mobile quarterback. That puts stress on the interior linebackers and safeties. One more thing for a DC to worry about, and one less thing to exploit your offensive line. Not always an absolute necessity, but advantage offense.

2023 will be another transitional year for Kentucky's offensive line. Take that into account. If our 2023 quarterback can't run away from the rush, he will get killed.
 
Unless you are running the wishbone or the veer, arm talent is a prerequisite for a successful quarterback. But all other things being equal, an athletic quarterback who can flee the backfield and run past the second level is always better than an immobile quarterback because defenses have to account for a mobile quarterback. That puts stress on the interior linebackers and safeties. One more thing for a DC to worry about, and one less thing to exploit your offensive line. Not always an absolute necessity, but advantage offense.

2023 will be another transitional year for Kentucky's offensive line. Take that into account. If our 2023 quarterback can't run away from the rush, he will get killed.
Cox, Burton, Flax and maybe Horsey back. I think the “transition” could be to the better.
 
LT & Goodwin are the key to 2023 O line. No other realistic viable top level LT on the roster, prospect in the recruiting class, or likely available in the portal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigblueinsanity
cleavega-girl-1104191137-4.jpg

cleavega-girl-1104191137-15.jpg
cleavega-girl-1104191137-18.jpg

They can faaarrr me if they want to!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: mattrudd
LT & Goodwin are the key to 2023 O line. No other realistic viable top level LT on the roster, prospect in the recruiting class, or likely available in the portal.

Imo we'll eventually see wohlabough at lt and Goodwin at RT.
 
I really think we should take two transfers because if we have to play Sheron or Hogan extended snaps we're in trouble, as we've already seen. I know Sheron is inexperienced but he doesn't have the arm talent to excel in this system.
From most of what I’ve read n what little I’ve seen there’s no problem with his arm
 
  • Like
Reactions: catben
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT