If this has been discussed I apologize in advance. I'm sure it was just more thumb-nosing but was there anything substantially new that came from it---if it has been made public?
They argued that since Auburn and Michigan weren't punished for similar crimes, they shouldn't be either. They also argued that the extra benefits alleged do not classify as extra benefits because they were available to general students as well.
Basically, they're ****ed
I expect to see James Comey and Donald Trump chuckling over a tea party before I'd expect any sort of resolution in the UNC saga.I've kind of checked out of this saga since the NCAA has just dragged its feet, were going on what now 4 years? For those in the know, does it seem UNC men's hoop is facing any type of serious punishment, or are we looking at more bs and maybe a slap on the wrist?
I expect to see James Comey and Donald Trump chuckling over a tea party before I'd expect any sort of resolution in the UNC saga.
It's a damn shame that UNC is trying to challenge the NCAA on the AFAM stuff, when the NCAA has willingly looked the other way on MANY other shenanigans. I'm hoping the friction between the 2 institutions will prevent the NCAA from doing that in the future.I must have missed the part in the NCAA reports that the Wheels for Heels program included free rental cars to the average student.