ADVERTISEMENT

Rovell: Cost of keeping Warriors together

Smashcat

All-American
Gold Member
Mar 13, 2012
76,624
115,265
113
Darren Rovell‏Verified account@darrenrovell 5m5 minutes ago
In 2010, Joe Lacob & Peter Guber spent a record $450M to buy Warriors. Ten years later, they will pay $400M in yearly salary + lux tax

DD0cRroV0AAIQ5j.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: UKUGA
Yikes.

New arena.

A bit of irony: the Dubs' play-off domination reduced league revenue, which lowered both the salary cap and tax luxury tax line. Not to mention the direct revenue loss to the Warriors for hosting fewer playoff games.

While their championships are increasing their value dramatically, their doninance is actually eating into the bottom line.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aike
People seem to get overly concerned about the cost of labor but almost never the owner's revenue.

Nary a cent of it is coming your way either way and the billionaire will be aight.
 
Yikes.

New arena.

A bit of irony: the Dubs' play-off domination reduced league revenue, which lowered both the salary cap and tax luxury tax line. Not to mention the direct revenue loss to the Warriors for hosting fewer playoff games.

While their championships are increasing their value dramatically, their doninance is actually eating into the bottom line.
Wasn't just the Warriors. Cavs slaughtered the East as well, going 4-0, 4-0, and 4-1. Only two series went to seven games. An all-time low total of playoff games were played, at least since the first round was expanded to 7 games that is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrankUnderwood
Wasn't just the Warriors. Cavs slaughtered the East as well, going 4-0, 4-0, and 4-1. Only two series went to seven games. An all-time low total of playoff games were played, at least since the first round was expanded to 7 games that is.


Which caused the salary cap to go down, and thus players making less money. Wonder how many "super teams" the players union will allow moving forward...
 
NBA needs to do away w/ deferred payments and enforce a strict salary cap. Outside those parameters you can spend your money any way you want. If you wanna max your salary on 3 superstars and then fill out your roster w/ 9 church league volunteers, that's your bidness, but the hard cap will be enforced.
 
NBA needs to do away w/ deferred payments and enforce a strict salary cap. Outside those parameters you can spend your money any way you want. If you wanna max your salary on 3 superstars and then fill out your roster w/ 9 church league volunteers, that's your bidness, but the hard cap will be enforced.

Agreed....never been a big NBA fan, but not fun to watch if all the good players are on the same team.
 
NBA needs to do away w/ deferred payments and enforce a strict salary cap. Outside those parameters you can spend your money any way you want. If you wanna max your salary on 3 superstars and then fill out your roster w/ 9 church league volunteers, that's your bidness, but the hard cap will be enforced.
Artificially capping salaries is anti-American
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aces Fan
Durant is back and they are going to probably win the next two titles if they stay healthy.

Doubt they care about that.
 
I'm always amazed by UK fans complaining about 1 team acquiring too much talent.

for me, the issue i have is...

why is there so many shitty players in NBA? lol, i like loaded teams...in fact i want to see more loaded team.
 
for me, the issue i have is...

why is there so many shitty players in NBA? lol, i like loaded teams...in fact i want to see more loaded team.

You would see less bad players in the league if teams were allowed to cut underperforming players and sign better ones without receiving cap-related penalties.

Then the rich teams would keep rolling the dice until they hit on a winner. The Lakers would have waived Mozgov and Deng, and held onto Russell, for instance.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT