Remember when the NCAA said they had 20 +/- schools about to investigated?
- Thread starter TankedCat
- Start date
Of course we are, because the NCAA is going to make those other schools a priority and let the UNC issue work itself out academically. The NCAA is not going to charge Roy with anything even though he has been a solid contributor to the UNC academic success train.
I am trying to wrap my head around the indecisiveness of 20+ years of academic fraud committed at UNC and now, the Hookergate scandal at UL and the possibility of another UK player being ruled ineligible due to an issue with a handler.. Can someone please explain what the core issue is with Skal Labissiere and how it merits ineligibility for the coming season, especially in light of the academic fraud at UNC? I am confused...
The NCAA is more or less a clique with a three tiered system of rules application . Above the law for the schools in the clique , ruled by the law for those the clique isn't threatened by and hunted by the law for those the clique is threatened by .
At this point, we simply cannot compare the situations. UL is brand new and yet to be investigated. UNC is awaiting a final say from the NCAA on their LOIC. UK is simply waiting for a player to be cleared. We don't know what the holdup is. I think we have to be patient and see how all 3 situations are resolved and then we can go burn down the HQ in Indy if we don't like the result!
![[winking]](http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/wink.r191677.gif "Winking [winking]")
people are a little too paranoid about Skal . If Uk ain't worried then I'm not . But the NCAA is a total joke and the people who run are criminals.
Huh? It was common knowledge that it was stretch for him to play.
I'll bet a lot of money Skal will play.
i would like to see something backfire on the ncaa, but so far i haven't seen anybody take any action against them that has changed anything that they do.
