Seems to me that an easy fix to our offensive woes would be to a more transition, fast break, up tempo style.
It's obvious we don't have an interior post presence. We don't have a single guy that is equipped to post up, get it, and score. And we have 3 PGs basically. So why are we playing this half court grind it out style of ball?
When that is the case it's logical to make it a 94 foot game rather than a half court game. We're not built that well for a half court grind it out style. I think Cal is just caught up in trying to teach them how to do certain things. Part of it is he has to coach the basics because of high turnover of players. He does have to prepare us for the last 5 minutes of a close game when we have to execute in the half court. I get that. Trying to make them better at their weaknesses is fine for a while. That's all well and good now, but at some point I think you have to play towards your strengths moreso than trying to lessen your weaknesses.
And this team is built perfectly for a running push the ball style. Ulis is great at pushing it. Great passer and decision maker on the run. Briscoe is ideal for it because he's best at going to the goal headfirst in a bull rush, and in the fast break the lane is open for when he does that (as opposed to when he gets in trouble driving into traffic). Murray is the shooter and I think fits the filling of the wing nicely (think Jeff Fryer's role on those old Loyola Marymount teams, only expanded because he can also drive). Our bigs aren't much posting in the block, but Poythress/Lee/Skal are all really really good at running the floor and finishing good set ups (like lobs).
All our guys would flourish in an up and down game imo. The extra space to operate would help accentuate Briscoe's positives while negating his bad points, and I think Skal would really benefit from not operating in traffic with as much help defense.
I wish I could ask Cal why he hasn't done it, because it really just makes all kinds of logical sense. If your half court offense is blah, then make it a full court offense. When your players strengths are geared towards a full court game then play that way. It's like we're a football team with a great QB and some talented WRs, but are insistent on running it up the gut every down. At some point you have to just do what you're good at.
It's obvious we don't have an interior post presence. We don't have a single guy that is equipped to post up, get it, and score. And we have 3 PGs basically. So why are we playing this half court grind it out style of ball?
When that is the case it's logical to make it a 94 foot game rather than a half court game. We're not built that well for a half court grind it out style. I think Cal is just caught up in trying to teach them how to do certain things. Part of it is he has to coach the basics because of high turnover of players. He does have to prepare us for the last 5 minutes of a close game when we have to execute in the half court. I get that. Trying to make them better at their weaknesses is fine for a while. That's all well and good now, but at some point I think you have to play towards your strengths moreso than trying to lessen your weaknesses.
And this team is built perfectly for a running push the ball style. Ulis is great at pushing it. Great passer and decision maker on the run. Briscoe is ideal for it because he's best at going to the goal headfirst in a bull rush, and in the fast break the lane is open for when he does that (as opposed to when he gets in trouble driving into traffic). Murray is the shooter and I think fits the filling of the wing nicely (think Jeff Fryer's role on those old Loyola Marymount teams, only expanded because he can also drive). Our bigs aren't much posting in the block, but Poythress/Lee/Skal are all really really good at running the floor and finishing good set ups (like lobs).
All our guys would flourish in an up and down game imo. The extra space to operate would help accentuate Briscoe's positives while negating his bad points, and I think Skal would really benefit from not operating in traffic with as much help defense.
I wish I could ask Cal why he hasn't done it, because it really just makes all kinds of logical sense. If your half court offense is blah, then make it a full court offense. When your players strengths are geared towards a full court game then play that way. It's like we're a football team with a great QB and some talented WRs, but are insistent on running it up the gut every down. At some point you have to just do what you're good at.