Refs wouldn't check video to see if Murray signaled for TO

[SilentsAreGolden]

Naturally.

 

[Bill - Shy Cat]

Got to give Cal credit for telling them to check. Bastards refused to do so.

 

[UPSCat4080]

Pretty sure it is non reviewable. Murraybhad his back turned anyway and Ulis should have been the one calling it since all eyes were on him with the ball.

 

[KWilt43atbuzz]

And he was calling it with about 2 seconds too.

 

[KA4Prez]

You can't review that.

 

[Icecoldbrewdoggy]

Surprised Tyler didn't signal for one as soon as he snatched it.

 

[UKgreatinmyveins]

It's not reviewable but you learn something new everyday!

 

[Brooklyncats]

Pretty sure it is non reviewable. Murraybhad his back turned anyway and Ulis should have been the one calling it since all eyes were on him with the ball.

Doesn't matter if he was on his back he was right next to the ref and the ref missed it

 

[SilentsAreGolden]

Not reviewable is a joke. Why should anything be not reviewable? I see no rhyme or reason in what is and is not reviewable.

 

[UKgreatinmyveins]

Doesn't matter if he was on his back he was right next to the ref and the ref missed it

I'm glad the ref missed it, he was doing his job, looking at the player with the ball, but refs suck.

 

[UPSCat4080]

Doesn't matter if he was on his back he was right next to the ref and the ref missed it

So it doesn't matter that Murray has his timeout signaled up against his stomach with the ref standing behind him lol? Sure...whatever you say guy. Murray never opened his mouth. Only signaled where no one could see it.

 

[UKUGA]

"It's a judgment call", according to Bilas. (Whatever that means within the context of a guy signaling for a time out and the refs missing it).

But, Humphries ball bounce = Tech is not a judgment call.

 

[catfan in loserville]

And he did call it, right in front of the ref, even Jay Bilas was blowing it off, he is terrible these days.