No. In fact, it’s specifically not allowed. NIL cannot be tied to performance.Much like coaches for the post season tournaments, do our players have similar incentives?
I haven’t seen how these NIL contracts are written but pro players have these extras added in. An example could be $50k for winning the SECT, being MVP, etc.
In the real world, you can get a nice bonus if you perform well. Or you can get fired if you don’t. The problem with the NIL model is it’s all carrot and no stick. Colleges are giving these kids millions regardless of how they perform. And on top of that, the players can just leave whenever they want.
Sorry for the tangent.
None of them have signed contracts.No. In fact, it’s specifically not allowed. NIL cannot be tied to performance.
At least for returning players, and probably to a lesser extent seniors, there would be a de facto version of this where you make it farther in the tournament, you become more popular, and local businesses are more inclined to pay you to be in a commercial. Not quite what you’re talking about.Much like coaches for the post season tournaments, do our players have similar incentives?
I haven’t seen how these NIL contracts are written but pro players have these extras added in. An example could be $50k for winning the SECT, being MVP, etc.
Well, yes. You can offer them anything you want under the table. It wouldn’t be considered NIL if it was discovered though.None of them have signed contracts.
Well, yes. You can offer them anything you want under the table. It wouldn’t be considered NIL ifNone of them have signed contracts.
YES. As I stated earlier, NIL cannot be tied to performance. That’s a specific part of what differentiates NIL from simply “paying players.” The idea being they are generated income based on licensing their likeness, not being paid directly to play basketball.I agree with this 100% but I wonder why it hasn't been done yet. Is there something legaly stopping this from happening, or are coaches still trying to feel this out and don't want to be the first one put performance incentives in NIL deals?
That could be a possible workaround. I still don’t think it would officially work depending on the wording, since playing in and of itself could be considered “performance.” It also makes it an awkward situation because a coach benching a player could cancel their income.Right but can’t the license be based on amount of games they’re playing? Like the more you’re seen the more valuable the NIL license is