ADVERTISEMENT

Paul Finebaum v. Matt Jones

BigBlueSean

All-SEC
Gold Member
Oct 23, 2013
8,134
3,011
113
40
Audio

Is it me or does Finebaum's arguments at least have some legitimacy to it?

First let's say this team doesn't make a final four. I think Murray, Skal and Briscoe fall in the 1st round. Let's say a next year Cal doesn't win a title. Fox, Monk, Gabriel, Bam all are 1st rounders. Hypothetically let's say Cal moves on...

1) While at UK Cal will have had 22 first round draft picks. Three, maybe 4 overall #1 draft picks and 1 title to show. Would that not be considered underachievement? 4 coaches/teams in the past 10 years have won 2 titles in 6 years with far less talent. I get it the final fours are fine and dandy...but if all he has is 1 title that's an underachievement. Now what he has done via the NBA guys will effect us long after he is gone... but all that talent with 1 title would be a tad bit of a waste.


2) What has Stoops done to warrant this much of a leash? A dumb contract extension put us in a bad situation should he not produce results next year. He has folded like a tent twice. I hope Gran is the answer but after last year I learned not to put blind stock in 1st year hires.


I'm just saying Paul had legit points IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cmarcellUSAF
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Go Big.
Get Premium.

Join Rivals to access this premium section.

  • Say your piece in exclusive fan communities.
  • Unlock Premium news from the largest network of experts.
  • Dominate with stats, athlete data, Rivals250 rankings, and more.
Log in or subscribe today Go Back