Originally posted by UKfan215:
The Bob Stoops situation at Oklahoma puzzles me just a bit. I think the guy is a terrific coach. You don't win a national championship in your second season at a school if you don't know what you are doing. He also recruits extremely well. Hell, OU's classes always rank right up there with the best of them. I'm just not quite sure what is wrong there. They should be winning at a higher level than they are.
Bob Stoops and Oklahoma kind of remind me a little of Mark Richt at Georgia. I think both are great coaches and both recruit very well. Yet it always seems that both of them end up losing a game or two each season that they shouldn't lose. I just can't quite put a finger on the problem. Obviously they both win, but it seems they don't quite win at the level their fans probably expect. Nor do they quite win at the level they should based on the resources available to them. Maybe it is nothing more than bad luck. Who knows? Both coaches seem to have did better during the first half of their tenure and each of those respective programs. So maybe burnout is a factor too.
Ah well, should Bob Stoops be a short timer at Oklahoma and if he has any trouble finding another head coaching gig (I don't think he will), then I'm sure his little brother could make room for him here as DC. I certainly wouldn't object to having him join the party.