Watch it all & listen closely. Then ask yourself if it's meltdown control for the home schools or a home school. Ingram's last sentence really makes me think his decision is purely business. It's worth a watch:
Reggie BullockHe's trying to tell UNC fans , Stackhouse and the outhe UNC player that went to same school..(name). not to be upset with him when he goes to Duke ..It's a business decision
Duke
Almost certainly Duke. I dont think UK is really in the picture.
Our best shots are Maker or Diallo, of the players currently in this class.
Outside of MKG and Terrence Jones, Cal hasn't had much luck with SFs at UK. Not sure why.
What you see tomorrow is probably what you'll see next year regarding Tatum - a five star wing choosing Duke. Our fans will foolishly follow Tatum's recruitment for the next 6 to 12 months, however.
Calipari has never landed an lottery-level scoring wing while he's been at UK. MKG was a workhorse, but not a scorer.
What you see tomorrow is probably what you'll see next year regarding Tatum - a five star wing choosing Duke. Our fans will foolishly follow Tatum's recruitment for the next 6 to 12 months, however.
Calipari has never landed an lottery-level scoring wing while he's been at UK. MKG was a workhorse, but not a scorer.
What you see tomorrow is probably what you'll see next year regarding Tatum - a five star wing choosing Duke. Our fans will foolishly follow Tatum's recruitment for the next 6 to 12 months, however.
Calipari has never landed an lottery-level scoring wing while he's been at UK. MKG was a workhorse, but not a scorer.
Again though, why do you think that is? There has to be some reason Cal is not connecting with scoring SFs.
Again though, why do you think that is? There has to be some reason Cal is not connecting with scoring SFs.
Man, you really filtered this little profile. What else has Cal not landed at Kentucky? A lottery point guard over 6'7, yet averages 15 points, as well as 11 assists per game with the tenacity to grab a few rebounds per game as well?
Cal has landed a high lottery-level small forward, but if we're being specific like you, then yes, Cal has landed a lottery-level scoring wing. Devin Booker, our shooting guard, played plenty of 2 and 3. That defines a wing.
All of the recruiting experts have said we had a zero chance getting him, why did we recruit him? Why wasn't Jaylen Brown recruited harder?
What you see tomorrow is probably what you'll see next year regarding Tatum - a five star wing choosing Duke. Our fans will foolishly follow Tatum's recruitment for the next 6 to 12 months, however.
Calipari has never landed an lottery-level scoring wing while he's been at UK. MKG was a workhorse, but not a scorer.
What was James Young?
What was James Young?
The #17 pick in his draft.
Booker is comparable, but I'm addressing the Wiggins-Brown-Johnson-Winslow-Barnes-Newman-Ingram types who are sure-fire lottery picks; i.e., the proverbial "transcendent" scoring wing.
Even if you throw Young into that mix, is he not the exception rather than the rule?
A shooting guard who can play SF if he has to, which is what he did here at UK.
There's a reason we still recruited Wiggins after Young signed.