ADVERTISEMENT

NCAA: What is the "death penalty"?

rick64

All-American
Jan 25, 2007
22,203
28,850
113
Louisville, KY
The repeat-violator legislation (“death penalty”) is applicable to an institution if, within a five-year period, the following conditions exist:

  • Following the announcement of a major case, a major violation occurs and
  • The second violation occurred within five years of the starting date of the penalty assessed in the first case. The second major case does not have to be in the same sport as the previous case to affect the second sport.
  • Penalties for repeat violators of legislation, subject to exemptions authorized by the committee on the basis of specifically stated reasons, may include any of the following:
    • The prohibition of some or all outside competition in the sport involved in the latest major violation for one or two sport seasons and the prohibition of all coaching staff members in that sport from involvement (directly or indirectly) in any coaching activities at the institution during that period
    • The elimination of all initial grants-in-aid and recruiting activities in the sport involved in the latest major violation in question for a two-year period.
    • The requirement that all institutional staff member serving on the NCAA Board of Directors; Leadership, Legislative, Presidents or Management Councils; Executive Committee or other Association governance bodies resign their positions. All institutional representatives shall be ineligible to serve on any NCAA committee for a period of four years and
    • The requirement that the institution relinquish its Association voting privileges for a four-year period.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deli owl
So basically, if you look uo the definition of the phrase "DEATH PENALTY" in the NCAA's dictionary it just says: "SEE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE".
 
  • Like
Reactions: oceanna and Nuke99m
Sounds like the glove fits. I really don't see how this can be anything else BUT the Death Penalty.
 
UofL will argue that the separate violations that occurred were basically during the same time and should be treated as just one entire period of lawlessness. Since they came so close together they will say that it's all because of the same athletic administration. Thereby, arguing against the death penalty.
 
UofL will argue that the separate violations that occurred were basically during the same time and should be treated as just one entire period of lawlessness. Since they came so close together they will say that it's all because of the same athletic administration. Thereby, arguing against the death penalty.
i was getting ready to write something similar. they seriously will be like our punishment had not even started yet we were appealing so it doesn't count.
 
There's never been a clearer-cut case for the Death Penalty in the history of college athletics.
 
Hey Rick, and Turtleneck , does the saying "Dead man Walking" mean anything to you lol !!!! And in related news Zipp is a super dumb bastard !!!
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT