http://www.coachcal.com/45460/2017/...geous-alexander-works-with-eye-to-the-future/
Not sure if it was posted.
Not sure if it was posted.
He's gon b good, I'm sure.So i got the chance to watch Rex Cats match and Radio talk at the end.
I really like Shai, and very interested in what he'll do here.
His growth is great, and his confidence with shooting will go a long way. I think thats 50% of shooting game, if you have confidence you'll shoot decent. If he can get rep to perfect his shot, he might actually surprise us with shooting. At least i am hoping.
But with his complete physical change, i am really intrigued about his potential. He also said he gained 10 lbs already. Which is great news!!!
I think Cal sold Quade on being the man at point guard. I think Green will start and get most of the minutes at that spot.
I think Shai will back up both him and Diallo though.
Alexander has 6th man first rounder written all over him. Maybe even lottery. His measurables are off the charts. He reminds me of a better version of Jeremy Lamb.
Just gonna depend on what kind of year he has.
I would say he could easily play some 3 also but for the first time in a while under Cal that spot is covered pretty well. Vanderbilt and Knox are both as pure of 3's as it gets.
Alexander being listed as a 4 star was misleading to a lot of people. He is a 5 star and will be one of the top players on the team. His size and the way he plays, I don't see how he couldn't start. Too much being hung on his 4 star ranking.
No, I am just going by how he looked to me. Not what I've read.You don't see how he couldn't start? Meaning you can't visualize Green being the better player? Or are we just gearing up for our latest why won't Cal play so and so situation?
SGA and Baker are already drawing rave reviews from the "Is Richie gonna play tonight?" crowd.
No, I am just going by how he looked to me. Not what I've read.
Again, you literally, "don't see how he couldn't start?"
Is that really what you mean?
So a lineup of Green, Diallo, Knox, Washington, and Richards would put you into shock or what?
Not everybody gets to start, but I can guarantee you these 4 players will be.
Green
Diallo
Knox
Washington
Cal will have a ton of options for who he wants to feature with them but that is your core 4 to start the year.
Just a question, why do you think Vanderbilt, our second highest recruit, would not start?
And if he never got injured, my money says he would be borderline top 5 recruit and would be our top recruit.
SGA is being a bit overrated here for the short term and underrated long term. He will not have the impact some of you expect next year, but will be at least a two year player with tremendous upside.
It's not even August and you are making claims like this?Not everybody gets to start, but I can guarantee you these 4 players will be.
Green
Diallo
Knox
Washington
Cal will have a ton of options for who he wants to feature with them but that is your core 4 to start the year.
How do you think the 5 'long' players would do together?
Vanderbilt
Know
Washington
Alexander
Diallo
Would you have diablo run point in this lineup ?
Probably Alexander. Haven't seen Diallo enough.
He sounds like a great kid but I don't see any of this crazy hype yet. Lottery????
He definitely looks like a multi-year player to me.
I hope I'm wrong and he blows up this season but this seems to be a classic rafters overreach.
Rebounding is listed as one of Vanderbilts strengths. The draft sites say he was one of the best rebounding forwards in the class. I would think with his handle being pg tight that he would be great with Richards running the floor catching oops from Quade and Jarred. Your analysis makes sense. People have seen how hard Washington plays and people forget Vanderbilt plays with a huge chip on his shoulder has had his motor and defense compared to MKG. This team is so versatile. Its why I really think we may win it this year. We have the ability to adapt to almost any other teams game plan. I see Vanderbilt being the zone destroyer. Have do what Briscoe was doing vs the zone getting to the free throw line and causing havoc. Except at 6ft9 it could be A better weapon than a three point shooter vs the zone. The will have to come to him and he will drop off for easy buckets and crash the board and with a zone being weak vs offensive boards and him being a strong rebounder it will be fun to watchI have a feeling that Vanderbilt only starts if we run with 2 guards/3 forwards. PJ effectively playing the 5.
I just think that looking at the pieces, you want Knox in for offense, Washington for rebounding and general toughness, and it's easier to bring Vanderbilt off the bench to sub for multiple spots.
But if Vanderbilt started every game, not like that would be shocking either. We just don't know yet with this team, moreso than any Cal team to date.
Didn't read everyone's response but I don't think many are saying lottery.
I think he's two years max. However his potential is really good, I think.
Rebounding is listed as one of Vanderbilts strengths. The draft sites say he was one of the best rebounding forwards in the class. I would think with his handle being pg tight that he would be great with Richards running the floor catching oops from Quade and Jarred. Your analysis makes sense. People have seen how hard Washington plays and people forget Vanderbilt plays with a huge chip on his shoulder has had his motor and defense compared to MKG. This team is so versatile. Its why I really think we may win it this year. We have the ability to adapt to almost any other teams game plan. I see Vanderbilt being the zone destroyer. Have do what Briscoe was doing vs the zone getting to the free throw line and causing havoc. Except at 6ft9 it could be A better weapon than a three point shooter vs the zone. The will have to come to him and he will drop off for easy buckets and crash the board and with a zone being weak vs offensive boards and him being a strong rebounder it will be fun to watch
I agree that lineup could run the tread off the sneakers of opposing teams. You could conceivably have a lineup with Alexander at the point. Diallo and Knox at the 2 and 3, Vanderbilt at the 4, and PJ /Gabriel at the 5. That team would have a pg with a 6ft11 wingspan and everyone else over 7ft Wingspan. All five players with the ability to lead the break. Vanderbilt's handle is so much different than other bigs I have seen with a decent handle. most even with tight handles dribble higher naturally which Slowing them down a little. Vanderbilt keeps his dribble low so he gets up the floor faster with the ball. Man his ability to take a rebound and just go will have Cal lose his voice Yelling RUN RUN. lol well but I have a feeling both PJ and Richards may cause that first. DONT FOUL DONT FOUL! pretty sure bam thought that was his name by the end of the seasonI'm not knocking Vanderbilt at all. Because of the makeup of our team, I could see him being our best player, playing the most minutes, and still coming off the bench. Gives us more flexibility.
I'm most intrigued by the possibility of playing Washington (or even Wenyen) at the "5." If Richards isn't ready, and SKJ/Wynyard aren't much improved, our most competitive lineups might be built that way.
One of my favorite UK teams of all time was that 1986 squad that played Kenny Walker, Winston Bennett, and 3 guards.
Vanderbilt can run the point too in this lineup People dont realize the handle and the passing ability this kid has.Probably Alexander. Haven't seen Diallo enough.