Barnes is a good one; I was thinking of Thaddeus Young as a good one too.Originally posted by BLEEDBLUE444:
Said this in another thread, but Lyles will not have a defined position, and this is where his true value lies, depending on what his coach wants to run at the next level, Lyles will indeed be a floor stretching 4, if the team he is with has an anchor down low. Or he will be a three that can cause matchup nightmares for smaller defenders, and will be plenty capable of hitting 3 pointers in the league.
Lyles will eventually hit a lot of threes for some NBA team, and his value lies in that he can play 3 or a 4 whether the coach wants to play small ball or not. The only reason peeple think Lyles is not capable of playing the 3 is that he won't be able to guard 3's in the league, I think personally he will be able to guard 3's and 4's and be just fine.
I think it's strange to put a defined label on Lyles, he will be able to play multiple positions in the league depending on whatever system he gets drafted into. He's a Swiss army knife of sorts and that will make him very valuable to many teams. Some guys never make it in the league because they are "tweeners" Well Trey is the complete opposite of a "tweener" imo he has the ability to play 3 or 4 and contribute significantly to a team.
My NBA comparison for Trey is a better Harrison Barnes, even though Harrison Barnes to his credit plays in a loaded system, if he was in NY per say, his numbers would look a ton better. I also like the Barnes comparison because he is versatile, sometimes Golden State and Kerr run him at the 4 and he is a better than expected post up player, and he can also spread out and give opposing 4's trying to guard him matchup nightmares. Then something's they play Barnes at the 3.
I know Barnes hit more 3's in college than Trey is, but we simply have to many options for Trey to just jack up 3's in our offense. He is a smart and composed player, who takes great shots. Trey's shot selection is simply incredibly poised for a freshman, Barnes used to jack up a lot of shots in UNC's uptempo offense and that team didn't have nearly the amount of options we do. If Trey jacked up a lot of 3's this season, a certain amount of them would find their way to the bottom of the net
Originally posted by BLEEDBLUE444:
Said this in another thread, but Lyles will not have a defined position, and this is where his true value lies, depending on what his coach wants to run at the next level, Lyles will indeed be a floor stretching 4, if the team he is with has an anchor down low. Or he will be a three that can cause matchup nightmares for smaller defenders, and will be plenty capable of hitting 3 pointers in the league.
Lyles will eventually hit a lot of threes for some NBA team, and his value lies in that he can play 3 or a 4 whether the coach wants to play small ball or not. The only reason peeple think Lyles is not capable of playing the 3 is that he won't be able to guard 3's in the league, I think personally he will be able to guard 3's and 4's and be just fine.
I think it's strange to put a defined label on Lyles, he will be able to play multiple positions in the league depending on whatever system he gets drafted into. He's a Swiss army knife of sorts and that will make him very valuable to many teams. Some guys never make it in the league because they are "tweeners" Well Trey is the complete opposite of a "tweener" imo he has the ability to play 3 or 4 and contribute significantly to a team.
My NBA comparison for Trey is a better Harrison Barnes, even though Harrison Barnes to his credit plays in a loaded system, if he was in NY per say, his numbers would look a ton better. I also like the Barnes comparison because he is versatile, sometimes Golden State and Kerr run him at the 4 and he is a better than expected post up player, and he can also spread out and give opposing 4's trying to guard him matchup nightmares. Then something's they play Barnes at the 3.
I know Barnes hit more 3's in college than Trey is, but we simply have to many options for Trey to just jack up 3's in our offense. He is a smart and composed player, who takes great shots. Trey's shot selection is simply incredibly poised for a freshman, Barnes used to jack up a lot of shots in UNC's uptempo offense and that team didn't have nearly the amount of options we do. If Trey jacked up a lot of 3's this season, a certain amount of them would find their way to the bottom of the net
Bleed Blue you are dead on with every single thing you have said in this thread . I have no idea why people seem to think trey isn't a SF . He can shoot 3's . When he makes them they are dead on and even the 3's he misses are in and out . we don't need that from him but he can do it as his shot is smooth . I have no doubt he would make around 35 of 100 3's he took in game situations. And he is great off the dribble. He is alot like Barnes i agree and the Thaddeus Young is another great comparison. He isn't like an old school SF like Scottie Pippen or Ron Mercer but he isn't a modern PF like Al Horford or AD either . He is more like what i call the new school SF . And Barnes is a great example of that . Can post up and do the hook shot with the best of them but he excels in transitition and shooting the J.Originally posted by BLEEDBLUE444:
I would imagine that Durant and Lebron would do to Trey Lyles what they do to most people in the NBA, who actually stops Lebron and Durant on a nightly basis, no one does. As for Wiggins and Leonard those are probably the two best up and coming SF in the NBA, they are going to give everyone trouble! It's not like anyone guarda those guys and completely renders them scoreless of something...
Anyhow, I truly do believe that Trey will play 3 in certain situations and certain lineups, he will play the 3 and the 4. Could I be wrong? Absolutely, really only time will tell
I agree. He is too slow to play the 3 in the NBA. He will need to work on his strength to play the PF at the next level. I believe anther year at the college level under the coaches t UK could really help Lyles.Originally posted by Hoskins91:
He's a pf. His perimeter game is not where it needs to be, and he's not guarding NBA 3's.
Why don't we need him to hit 3's ?Originally posted by caneintally:
Bleed Blue you are dead on with every single thing you have said in this thread . I have no idea why people seem to think trey isn't a SF . He can shoot 3's . When he makes them they are dead on and even the 3's he misses are in and out . we don't need that from him but he can do it as his shot is smooth . I have no doubt he would make around 35 of 100 3's he took in game situations. And he is great off the dribble. He is alot like Barnes i agree and the Thaddeus Young is another great comparison. He isn't like an old school SF like Scottie Pippen or Ron Mercer but he isn't a modern PF like Al Horford or AD either . He is more like what i call the new school SF . And Barnes is a great example of that . Can post up and do the hook shot with the best of them but he excels in transitition and shooting the J.Originally posted by BLEEDBLUE444:
I would imagine that Durant and Lebron would do to Trey Lyles what they do to most people in the NBA, who actually stops Lebron and Durant on a nightly basis, no one does. As for Wiggins and Leonard those are probably the two best up and coming SF in the NBA, they are going to give everyone trouble! It's not like anyone guarda those guys and completely renders them scoreless of something...
Anyhow, I truly do believe that Trey will play 3 in certain situations and certain lineups, he will play the 3 and the 4. Could I be wrong? Absolutely, really only time will tell
Lyles isn't slow in the least . He isn't Kevin Durant fast but just go look at all the SF's in the NBA i promise you Lyles is as quick as half of them at least.Originally posted by DORTONCAT:
I agree. He is too slow to play the 3 in the NBA. He will need to work on his strength to play the PF at the next level. I believe anther year at the college level under the coaches t UK could really help Lyles.Originally posted by Hoskins91:
He's a pf. His perimeter game is not where it needs to be, and he's not guarding NBA 3's.
Originally posted by caneintally:
Bleed Blue you are dead on with every single thing you have said in this thread . I have no idea why people seem to think trey isn't a SF . He can shoot 3's . When he makes them they are dead on and even the 3's he misses are in and out . we don't need that from him but he can do it as his shot is smooth . I have no doubt he would make around 35 of 100 3's he took in game situations. And he is great off the dribble. He is alot like Barnes i agree and the Thaddeus Young is another great comparison. He isn't like an old school SF like Scottie Pippen or Ron Mercer but he isn't a modern PF like Al Horford or AD either . He is more like what i call the new school SF . And Barnes is a great example of that . Can post up and do the hook shot with the best of them but he excels in transitition and shooting the J.Originally posted by BLEEDBLUE444:
I would imagine that Durant and Lebron would do to Trey Lyles what they do to most people in the NBA, who actually stops Lebron and Durant on a nightly basis, no one does. As for Wiggins and Leonard those are probably the two best up and coming SF in the NBA, they are going to give everyone trouble! It's not like anyone guarda those guys and completely renders them scoreless of something...
Anyhow, I truly do believe that Trey will play 3 in certain situations and certain lineups, he will play the 3 and the 4. Could I be wrong? Absolutely, really only time will tell
How is 6'10 240 a lack of size? The top 6 PF's in the NBA are 6'10/250, 6'10/220, 6'10/243, 7'0/245, 6'10/245, 6'11/240 and Trey is only 18 years old. He is not undersized, underdeveloped maybe.Originally posted by cats#1again:
It's not necessarily his speed that's the problem. It's his ability to go around someone and create off the bounce. Right now he's closer to a 3 because of his lack of size. He has areas in which to improve at either position
I wonder how many NBA players have NOT gained weight from the age of 18?Originally posted by aikenite4uk:
He'll be a PF in the NBA...and a darn good one. I disagree with people who say he'll bulk up....he'll stay about the same weight and trade some baby fat for muscle...similar to the way the Harrison's changed their bodies from year 1 to 2.
In fact, my dream primary lineup (forget who starts), would be Lyles at the 4 along with Booker (3) and the Harrisons and KAT. Bring WCS off the bench for 25 minutes/game to terrorize the the second unit. Dakari and Lee would get mop up minutes only if we needed them. Ulis completes the three guard lineup. That's the ticket to cutting down the nets. Screw the platoon at this stage in the season.