Someone needs to compile the CCC list.So the same coach losing it … having it gifted back by an NCAA ruling …and then losing it again? I’m guessin that’s never happened before.
Hey, another Cal record!
It's because it's a more accurate measuring stick in terms of overall program success. In the case of winning percentage, Kansas really isn't even that close to Kentuck, having played well over 100 more games. All-Time wins is just a sexier stat. No reason we shouldn't have both though. Thanks, CCC.Just wait. We'll suddenly start hearing about all-time win percentage again after the win lead is gone.
I agree, but I honestly never heard anybody mention win percentage until Kentucky lost the wins lead. It's like a "yeah, but!" stat to me to make up for Kansas overtaking UK. TBH, the fact that Kentucky has the wins lead despite playing 100 games less is what makes this program awesome. Losing that is like losing something special (that sounds suspicious out of context, lol).It's because it's a more accurate measuring stick in terms of overall program success. In the case of winning percentage, Kansas really isn't even that close to Kentuck, having played well over 100 more games. All-Time wins is just a sexier stat. No reason we shouldn't have both though. Thanks, CCC.
I don't disagree at all.I agree, but I honestly never heard anybody mention win percentage until Kentucky lost the wins lead. It's like a "yeah, but!" stat to me to make up for Kansas overtaking UK...
Cal sure dry cracked ole MitchCal’s done but yet will still receive all the perks of being the Coach at UK. He’s laughing all the way to the bank because of our great AD. Such of an embarrassment for this state!
I started it on the why people are done with Cal theadSomeone needs to compile the CCC list.
Hope Keion Brooks doesn’t see this pic of Rupp or he may have to seek a safe space.Worst bench coach in the history of Kentucky Basketball.
No one actually debates that though except for Kentucky fans. Go ask a Kansas fan if they care. What matters is all time wins. The fact is we're about to forfeit it for the second time in just a few years. It's unforgivable.It's because it's a more accurate measuring stick in terms of overall program success. In the case of winning percentage, Kansas really isn't even that close to Kentuck, having played well over 100 more games. All-Time wins is just a sexier stat. No reason we shouldn't have both though. Thanks, CCC.
Cal cares as much about that as I do about the WNBA
Maybe so, but it's not the measuring stick most of the country talks about. Even UK fans almost never did UNTIL we lost the all time wins lead.It's because it's a more accurate measuring stick in terms of overall program success. In the case
If I had $50M in the bank I wouldn't give a hot shyte about some comments by fans.This won't take Cal's joy. He told me the other day on the radio. We can't take his joy.
The all-time winning percentage is great, but it pales in comparison to the simple statistic that is All-time Wins.It's because it's a more accurate measuring stick in terms of overall program success. In the case of winning percentage, Kansas really isn't even that close to Kentuck, having played well over 100 more games. All-Time wins is just a sexier stat. No reason we shouldn't have both though. Thanks, CCC.
Great points and agree... however, I think we will still own the all-time wins record going into next season.... they have a much, much tougher end of the season stretch than we do. If they get it this year it will be due to a good tournament run... but we may actually gain 3-4 games on them to end the conference season.No one actually debates that though except for Kentucky fans. Go ask a Kansas fan if they care. What matters is all time wins. The fact is we're about to forfeit it for the second time in just a few years. It's unforgivable.
I'm not disagreeing with any of that. But all-time wins can be just as disingenuous in this conversation with Kansas playing in well over 100 more games. With Kansas having a lifetime of good basketball, and playing in a weak conference as well, you'd think they'd have 50-75 more wins all-time than Kentucky.Maybe so, but it's not the measuring stick most of the country talks about. Even UK fans almost never did UNTIL we lost the all time wins lead.
And, of course, win percentage can also be highly misleading because level of competition can vary vastly. For example, there've been several decades when schools like UNLV and Gonzaga had the highest win percentage only because they played in crappy mid-major conferences.
And, frankly, UK's percentage has benefitted from that also because in the SEC before the mid 70s ...when it was a lily white league where only UK cared about BB ...the rest of the conference was generally known for being weak as hell. For nearly the entire Rupp era the SEC season was basically known as "UK's annual cakewalk."