We haven't seen enough of KS or Wade to know if they're ready. My hope is that Coen is much better at preparing them and scheming to their strengths within the confines of our system. If so, maybe they won't play like they're scared to death and our gameplan won't consist of straight handoffs and horizontal passes vs vertical ones.
The gameplan Sheron was given vs USC was pretty pathetic, imo. It was very apparent early on in the game that we were not going to throw the ball down the field. The botched reverse just dug a huge, quick hole and the whole offense looked shell-shocked from that point on. When hopelessly behind in the 4th and USC playing prevent, it looked like we opened up the playbook and let KS throw some 'real' passes. Hard to know if those same routes would have been open earlier in the game.
Wade had no chance against Iowa. First start and it's in a bowl game. OC was a fill-in. OL was sure to struggle against a very good defense regardless of who was QB (and RB1, for that matter). Without Will and CRod, Iowa didn't have many weapons to defend against. OL was its normal mediocre self and Iowa's D was just too strong. Wade made some poor passes, poor decisions and looked very hesitant making decisions. But, I'd bet he didn't have many reps throughout the year until bowl prep. Looked better in the Spring game according to Coen. Scang's scheme included too many slow-developing plays that Wade was not prepared enough to run. Not a fair test, imo. Now, after Spring, if Wade shows the same issues when inserted into a game this year, we may have to admit he's just not an SEC-level QB. Too early for me to consider making that call.