ADVERTISEMENT

Is spending $27m worth getting rid of

My question is, he’s set to get $1mil/year for life as an ambassador. If we buy him out, would negate it negate that clause? If he lives a long time then might end up being a wash. 20 years = 20 million.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TM2013
We could always get rid of him, and hire an upstart guy in the middle for cheap, to offset the cost. If he land that lottery ticket? Perfect, we have our coach. If not, we get rid of him and throw the bank at someone else.

The results and total cost won't be much different, looking back in 2028.
 
Actually IF anyone at UK had any guts they'd sue him for non-performance. It can easily be proven. Just use plain numbers. John Calipari could never EVER prove he could coach. Any winning he's EVER done is because his team was too good to lose.

Not sure recruiting is the bench mark for a competent coach. Looks like Cal has lied his way to the golden gates...
 
Last edited:
I think the time has expired. He must go. There's no excusing the results with the talent he has this year.
 
We could always get rid of him, and hire an upstart guy in the middle for cheap, to offset the cost. If he land that lottery ticket? Perfect, we have our coach. If not, we get rid of him and throw the bank at someone else.

The results and total cost won't be much different, looking back in 2028.
This is the best solution maybe get and older coach cheap for a few years huggybear Rick Stansbury type would be ok as well
 
My question is, he’s set to get $1mil/year for life as an ambassador. If we buy him out, would negate it negate that clause? If he lives a long time then might end up being a wash. 20 years = 20 million.
The $1 million ends in 2029 too. It’s not a lifetime thing. If he’s bought out, it would be for the remainder of his coaching contract. If he transitions into the admin role and is then bought out, they would owe him $1 million/year up until 2029.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UK90
Worth every penny.
And once he leaves the Cal nut huggers are going to cry because he is going to bash 100% of the fan base.
some of you will see him for what he really is.

Not one to check social media but what has his family been posting now? Wouldn't mind knowing but sure won't waste time checking... A whole lot of chirping going on? Should be crickets but no one has shame anymore...
 
The $1 million ends in 2029 too. It’s not a lifetime thing. If he’s bought out, it would be for the remainder of his coaching contract. If he transitions into the admin role and is then bought out, they would owe him $1 million/year up until 2029.

If UK sued him for cause (Non-performance.), they'd win. It needs to happen...
 
  • Like
Reactions: dynastydreamuk
We could always get rid of him, and hire an upstart guy in the middle for cheap, to offset the cost. If he land that lottery ticket? Perfect, we have our coach. If not, we get rid of him and throw the bank at someone else.

The results and total cost won't be much different, looking back in 2028.
You really wouldn’t need to go too cheap. If UK bought out Cal and paid a coach $6 million/year, they would only be on the hook for $4 million more annually through 2029 than they would if they kept him.

Find donors to pay half and then UK pay the other $2 million annually. But UK could afford that in their current budget without donor help.
 
The $1 million ends in 2029 too. It’s not a lifetime thing. If he’s bought out, it would be for the remainder of his coaching contract. If he transitions into the admin role and is then bought out, they would owe him $1 million/year up until 2029.
You broke the payout down in a thread the other night. Might bear repeating here if you have it handy for a quick copy and paste.
 
Maybe we can self report NCAA violations and fire him without pay for that. The. Give the NCAA 8 million to not sanction us. It worked for UT football
Anybody got a sack full of kiddie porn we can throw in Cal's Benz? We may not have to pay the buyout.
 
What does Cal do well? People say he is a great recruiter but recruiting doesn’t really mean a lot if you can’t construct a team from random 5 stars. Purdue probably has very few 5 stars, UCONN might not have any either. Cal not only can’t coach, he doesn’t evaluate talent well and doesn’t have a system that he recruits for. Cal doesn’t say, we need an awesome rebounder and defender, and finds one. He takes the highest ranked player and often times it’s not the Elite 5 stars anymore. Dilly and Reed are our best freshman and they were the lowest ranked.
 
Nope. UK would lose that battle in court in the blink of an eye. For cause is very specific in his contract. Nothing he has done violates his contract for cause.

It could be litigated well if UK would only take on that fight. I do not agree with you. many items are included in college coaching requirements.
 
My question is, he’s set to get $1mil/year for life as an ambassador. If we buy him out, would negate it negate that clause? If he lives a long time then might end up being a wash. 20 years = 20 million.
My understanding of the contract is that it's through the 28-29 season as either a coach, or ambassador. Here's a snippet from online sports publications outlining some of the details concerning this role.


"While Calipari's record-shattering deal in 2019 was termed a lifetime contract, the truth is that it was not. It's simply a lucrative, long-term deal that offers Calipari the opportunity to continue collecting a nice salary until June of 2029."


This contract isn’t guaranteed to last through 2028-29, however. After the 2023-24 season, Calipari will have a chance to opt out of the deal and accept a role as Special Assistant to the Athletic Director. If he were to exercise that option, Calipari would keep his $400,000 base salary for the remainder of his contract, along with an additional $550,000 per year in supplemental pay. That would make his total compensation $950,000 per year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dynastydreamuk
You broke the payout down in a thread the other night. Might bear repeating here if you have it handy for a quick copy and paste.
Here you go:

It’s stated in his contract that it’s paid out over the length of the contract on an annual basis, not one lump sum. Here is how the buyout works out annually:

24/25 - $6.4 million
25/26 - $6.8 million
26/27 - $6.8 million
27/28 - $6.8 million
28/29 - $6.8 million

The 3rd highest paid coach in college basketball is at $6.2 million (Izzo). Let’s say you bring on a coach and pay him $7 million max. That means you owe the following money between Cal’s annual buyout and the new coaches contract:

24/25 - $13.4 million
25/26 - $13.8 million
26/27 - $13.8 million
27/28 - $13.8 million
28/29 - $13.8 million

If you subtract what you’d be paying Cal annually if he remained the coach ($8.5 million in 24/25 and $9.1 million the following 4 years), you would need to come up with this much more money annually than you pay Cal right now in his contract::

24/25 - $4.9 million
25/26 - $4.7 million
26/27 - $4.7 million
27/28 - $4.7 million
28/29 - $4.7 million

In 2022, UK reported athletic department revenue of $159 million and expenses of $153.6 million, meaning they had $5.4 million at the end of the year….

It would not be difficult to get boosters on board for splitting the buyout. They pony up about $2.5 million annually and UK ponies up about $2.5 million ever year.
 
If I were the Board, I would simply call Mitch and Eli in a meeting and say:

Based on the recommendations from you two we are in this shit-show. Find a way to buy him out or we will be looking for your replacements.

Too many pansies making a lot of dough. They won't unless they are threatened much better than that...
 
It could be litigated well if UK would only take on that fight. I do not agree with you. many items are included in college coaching requirements.
Nope. I’m telling you there is nothing he has done that violates his contract. It just doesn’t. On the court performance (or lack thereof) cannot be a reason he is fired for cause.
 
Nope. I’m telling you there is nothing he has done that violates his contract. It just doesn’t. On the court performance (or lack thereof) cannot be a reason he is fired for cause.

I hear you but I do not agree. There are skeletons that could be used. There are multiple ways to bring out Cal in seriously bad lights.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wildcatjedi
Nope. UK would lose that battle in court in the blink of an eye. For cause is very specific in his contract. Nothing he has done violates his contract for cause.
What is for cause in the contract? The one I found says as defined in Paragraph 7d but there doesn’t appear to be a 7d


He is obligated to do post game radio shows and he ditches them quite often after bad losses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ugoff
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT