Cal?
I think at this point he’s never going to win us another title.
I think at this point he’s never going to win us another title.
YesCal?
I think at this point he’s never going to win us another title.
I can almost with all certainty say he will not.Cal?
I think at this point he’s never going to win us another title.
**** yes.Cal?
I think at this point he’s never going to win us another title.
TrueCal?
I think at this point he’s never going to win us another title.
Joe Craft is worth 1.5 billion dollars. If/when Joe Craft gets tired of Cal's schtick, then Cal will "leave to pursue other opportunites." No way UK says Cal is fired (even though he should be). It'll be UK's polite way of saying GTFO.
Mitch should be fired as well for structuring the deal like that.
This is the best solution maybe get and older coach cheap for a few years huggybear Rick Stansbury type would be ok as wellWe could always get rid of him, and hire an upstart guy in the middle for cheap, to offset the cost. If he land that lottery ticket? Perfect, we have our coach. If not, we get rid of him and throw the bank at someone else.
The results and total cost won't be much different, looking back in 2028.
The $1 million ends in 2029 too. It’s not a lifetime thing. If he’s bought out, it would be for the remainder of his coaching contract. If he transitions into the admin role and is then bought out, they would owe him $1 million/year up until 2029.My question is, he’s set to get $1mil/year for life as an ambassador. If we buy him out, would negate it negate that clause? If he lives a long time then might end up being a wash. 20 years = 20 million.
Worth every penny.
And once he leaves the Cal nut huggers are going to cry because he is going to bash 100% of the fan base.
some of you will see him for what he really is.
The $1 million ends in 2029 too. It’s not a lifetime thing. If he’s bought out, it would be for the remainder of his coaching contract. If he transitions into the admin role and is then bought out, they would owe him $1 million/year up until 2029.
You really wouldn’t need to go too cheap. If UK bought out Cal and paid a coach $6 million/year, they would only be on the hook for $4 million more annually through 2029 than they would if they kept him.We could always get rid of him, and hire an upstart guy in the middle for cheap, to offset the cost. If he land that lottery ticket? Perfect, we have our coach. If not, we get rid of him and throw the bank at someone else.
The results and total cost won't be much different, looking back in 2028.
You broke the payout down in a thread the other night. Might bear repeating here if you have it handy for a quick copy and paste.The $1 million ends in 2029 too. It’s not a lifetime thing. If he’s bought out, it would be for the remainder of his coaching contract. If he transitions into the admin role and is then bought out, they would owe him $1 million/year up until 2029.
Nope. UK would lose that battle in court in the blink of an eye. For cause is very specific in his contract. Nothing he has done violates his contract for cause.If UK sued him for cause (Non-performance.), they'd win. It needs to happen...
Anybody got a sack full of kiddie porn we can throw in Cal's Benz? We may not have to pay the buyout.Maybe we can self report NCAA violations and fire him without pay for that. The. Give the NCAA 8 million to not sanction us. It worked for UT football
Nope. UK would lose that battle in court in the blink of an eye. For cause is very specific in his contract. Nothing he has done violates his contract for cause.
My understanding of the contract is that it's through the 28-29 season as either a coach, or ambassador. Here's a snippet from online sports publications outlining some of the details concerning this role.My question is, he’s set to get $1mil/year for life as an ambassador. If we buy him out, would negate it negate that clause? If he lives a long time then might end up being a wash. 20 years = 20 million.
Here you go:You broke the payout down in a thread the other night. Might bear repeating here if you have it handy for a quick copy and paste.
If I were the Board, I would simply call Mitch and Eli in a meeting and say:
Based on the recommendations from you two we are in this shit-show. Find a way to buy him out or we will be looking for your replacements.
Nope. I’m telling you there is nothing he has done that violates his contract. It just doesn’t. On the court performance (or lack thereof) cannot be a reason he is fired for cause.It could be litigated well if UK would only take on that fight. I do not agree with you. many items are included in college coaching requirements.
Nope. I’m telling you there is nothing he has done that violates his contract. It just doesn’t. On the court performance (or lack thereof) cannot be a reason he is fired for cause.
Read pages 10-13 under section 10 and tell me where you think they could get him.I hear you but I do not agree. There are skeletons that could be used. There are multiple ways to bring out Cal in seriously bad lights.
What is for cause in the contract? The one I found says as defined in Paragraph 7d but there doesn’t appear to be a 7dNope. UK would lose that battle in court in the blink of an eye. For cause is very specific in his contract. Nothing he has done violates his contract for cause.