I know some on here ridicule Cal for taking Diallo or not getting certain recruits, but ask yourself one important question, would his predecessors have even been in the conversation? People should realize that not one top level coach gets every prospect they want, and nobody tops Cal in regard to getting them either. Cal's recruiting is akin to Ted Williams batting, yes they may strikeout every once in a while, but their batting average isn't to be topped in landing recruits/hitting either, and you wouldn't call Ted Williams a slouch, would you?
Now I remember the days of hoping that we would sign players like Verdell Jones, Maurice Sutton, Konner Tucker, etc to fill out our roster. I also remember watching players such as Michael Porter, Mark Coury, Sheray Thomas, etc struggle to make plays for UK. Now I'm not bashing these players as people, but the fact was none of them were remotely UK level players (not their fault I know). I also never watched the McDonald's or Jordan Brand games before Cal either, because it pained me seeing other blue bloods with multiple 5 stars in the game and seeing UK with one(if we were lucky that year). Also, for those that criticize Cal for the one title, do you really think his predecessors would have done any better with the recruits they were bringing in? Do you think UK would have been in as many Final 4's as they've enjoyed under Cal?
Btw, when Cal finally decides to retire from here(hopefully years down the road), UK will still reap the benefits of his coaching here, because future recruits will turn on the t.v. and see numerous UK players in the NBA. Just think how UNC is still benefitting from some guy wearing #23 even to this day.
Now I remember the days of hoping that we would sign players like Verdell Jones, Maurice Sutton, Konner Tucker, etc to fill out our roster. I also remember watching players such as Michael Porter, Mark Coury, Sheray Thomas, etc struggle to make plays for UK. Now I'm not bashing these players as people, but the fact was none of them were remotely UK level players (not their fault I know). I also never watched the McDonald's or Jordan Brand games before Cal either, because it pained me seeing other blue bloods with multiple 5 stars in the game and seeing UK with one(if we were lucky that year). Also, for those that criticize Cal for the one title, do you really think his predecessors would have done any better with the recruits they were bringing in? Do you think UK would have been in as many Final 4's as they've enjoyed under Cal?
Btw, when Cal finally decides to retire from here(hopefully years down the road), UK will still reap the benefits of his coaching here, because future recruits will turn on the t.v. and see numerous UK players in the NBA. Just think how UNC is still benefitting from some guy wearing #23 even to this day.