Looks to me like clock was at 5.8 when guy made the last FT. Then, the camera moves such that you can't see the clock on the inbounds. However, the next time we see it is very shortly after the player receives the inbounds and is running up the court, and the clock's at 5.5. Seems like the clock was accurate/reasonable to me.I saw somewhere that the discussion and decision wasn’t about the timing of the basket but rather whether the clock started on time on the inbounds. I can’t see the clock start on this video so can’t tell if the refs were right or not.
.1 or .2 seconds? Shot still would’ve been goodJust saw a new angle. The clock clearly didn't start on time. I think the officials got it right. It didn't start until he dribbled, not when he touched it.
Doesn’t matter unless their association allows do overs. The shot was good and should have counted.Just saw a new angle. The clock clearly didn't start on time. I think the officials got it right. It didn't start until he dribbled, not when he touched it.
Wow, if we did this we'd be able to lock up the entire court system just from the sheer volume of pathetic calls over the years. We'd also probably have 3-4 more titles handed our way (unless we hit judges that graduated from Puke, IU, UL, UNC, KU, UT, and other hated rivals...).It looks like this may end up in court. Not sure a bad call should be a legal matter but we shall see.
N.J. High School Hoops Team Takes Bad Call to Court
A bad call at the end of a high school basketball game raises the question of whether a court should reverse the outcome.www.sportico.com