Unfortuantely, they were going to be bad whether the first guy hit one 500 feet or struck out.
I just hope they're competitive again in two years or so.True, but all you can do is laugh.
Totally with you on it being good to see a fan favorite back in uniform but in the bullpen is where he should be. I'm pretty sure Arroyo is first to get bumped when DeSclafani returns from the DL. It will be a short lived stint with the SP injuries. In fact, I did not even have it mind that he would have a chance at the rotation coming out of Spring Training. Someone else is getting bumped to when Homer returns.Reds losing, but Bronson Arroyo not looking horrible. As I type that he just gives up a donger. What I don't understand is if they want him on the roster to help mentor the young guys, why isn't he a spot starter and primarily a long reliever to come in if one of the rookies hits a bad day. I think he could easily come in from the bullpen and pitch 2-3 effective innings. Beyond that hitters will adjust on their second time around with him. That being said, I am glad to see him back and healthy. He never missed a start when he was with the Reds, it has been hurt pretty much the entire time after he was traded.
So, when will the Reds wake up to discover they really suck, and it is not 2012 any more? Bullpen has been way beyond ridiculous so far, every bit as good this year as it was bad last season.
Apparently Winker headed back down after a brief 2 game stint. Should just send Patrick Kivlehan down. Never heard of him before this year. It's one thing to use the excuse for every day at bats but wonder when they will determine when he's MLB ready for good? I think he is now.
I'm aware what Kivlehan did yesterday, it was nice! I watched the game as I do all games. I've been following the rest of the players enough all season to form my own opinion on the ball club. His double isn't any different that what Jesse Winker (our #2 overall hitting prospect) with his clutch double as his 1st career hit to beat Milwaukee last weekend. 1 big hit either way doesn't negate my opinion wanting Jesse Winker called up who has all the accolades of being a solid MLB player someday. Kivlehan is getting his chance now and did so last year with 2 teams over a better prospect unlike Jesse who had just those 2 games. I don't think Patrick is an everyday player here outside of a spot start or a pinch hitter. He's had more chances at the MLB level than Winker. Gennett got the call in RF over Kivlehan and saw how that went.Kivlehan had the big 3 run double yesterday . This team really needs Mesaraco to come back healthy. Arroyo has looked pretty good in last 2 starts. Hamilton needs to be more
patient at the plate and try to work a few walks. Votto has been on fire lately. Duvall will come. Cozart has been great as has Suarez. If Mesaraco comes back it will be an impressive lineup.
Not really following your line of thinking. On one hand, you are criticizing Price for leaving Amir in too long; on the other hand, you are complaining that the starters aren't working enough innings and wearing out the bullpen. You see how the former might be causally related to the latter, right?Can't believe Price just kept Garrett in their struggling knowing it's not his night. Sometimes young guys need to learn to pitch out of a funk but this was a little excessive, it was clearly not his night. Don't think it was fair to Amir. 10 runs, 9 ER. Managed to get back within 2 and then the Brewers go up big again. Wonder how long this unconventional style of bullpen use will last before everyone's arms are worn out bailing out the starters. Already sending guys back a to Louisville after one game to recall fresh arms.
Let me make my "line of thinking" clear for you. What was their to be gained by keeping Amir Garrett in their so long while he was clearly getting smoked for 10 runs, 9 ER? You say confidence. Amir Garrett is a confident young man and I'm sure he'll bounce back. We had a 2 run ball game and are trying to stay in contention in the division. A line has to be drawn as some point. 6 or 7 runs allowed for a young pitcher is reasonable to let them work through the funk but anything after that is excessive for anyone. Leaving Garrett in the game cost any come back last night when the Reds put up some runs. However an example of someone who it did shake them up, Michael Lorenzen. I can remember him getting down on himself in his rookie season when he was left out there against the Padres to get smoked for 7 runs. Had to go back to AAA for more development. Hasn't started since the end of the season. It's working now because we're just in April but lets see how the use of our bullpen lasts through the dog days of summer.Not really following your line of thinking. On one hand, you are criticizing Price for leaving Amir in too long; on the other hand, you are complaining that the starters aren't working enough innings and wearing out the bullpen. You see how the former might be causally related to the latter, right?
Keep in mind, you are criticizing a former pitching coach. I can't remember the game or the pitcher, but I was listening to Thom and Jeff calling one of the middle innings of a game last week. The pitcher had allowed a run to be scored, and had walked multiple batters in the inning. Thom and Jeff let it be known that they were dumbfounded when Price visited the mound and instead of making a pitching change, left the starter in. But sure enough, the starter coaxed the next batter into an inning-ending double play.
When you go against conventional wisdom and it backfires, you will get called out every time. But you won't necessarily be praised when it succeeds. You think Thom and Jeff said, "well, I guess Price knew what he was doing" or "good decision to leave him in" or threw any praise Price's way after the starter made it out of the inning? Nope. But they would have been very vocal if the starter had not gotten out of the inning.
Price is trying to build the confidence of the young starters and get more out of them, and is doing what he can to make this team compete. I have been impressed with the way this team has battled this year, they definitely aren't laying down and accepting the dire preseason predictions. That comes from the top down. Price is doing his job.
I apologize for my hostility. I just wanted to be clear mostly on where I stand with my support of the Reds. That support will never waiver, win or lose. I get bitter with them because I am mostly frustrated with the front office and years of losing. Certainly don't ever blame the players if they are doing whatever they can to win. I understand what you're saying in your last paragraph about being busy with family and work. Hope they continue to rise so hopefully there will be something all Reds fans can look forward to in the future.First, dude, chill. If you think I blasted you, you have not been around here much. That wasn't a blast, that was me pointing out that you have two discordant positions you are taking.
Let me make my point clear. You are complaining on one hand about leaving the starter in too long, and then on the other about using the bullpen too much. Price was trying to stretch out the starter to alleviate the burden on the bullpen. Price can't win, he's damned if he does, and damned if he doesn't. He either goes to the bullpen too early, or left the starter in too long. You will have your choice of either argument any time the Reds lose, so it's always on Price.
I understand your point. Price gambled and lost. If he gambled and won (as he did in that prior game I referenced), it's a non-topic. However, let's say he pulled Garrett and put in a reliever. Let's say he pulled Garrett after he gave up 6 runs. That would mean we are getting into the bullpen at the start of the third inning. Our bullpen is having to work 7 innings. Price is hoping beyond all hope that Garrett can right the ship, settle down, and eat up some innings while keeping them in the game. It didn't work.
I don't question your fandom, and I'm not bashing or blasting. I'm telling you he is trying to make due with what he's got, and there's a lot of hard choices to make on a night like last night.
I started following the Reds in 1982, the year they lost 100 games. Everything was gravy after a season like that. Used to spend summer evenings on the back porch listening to Marty and Joe during my formative years. Truth be told, though, I have slacked off on my fandom over the years. I find it hard to watch baseball any more, the game is just too slow to keep my attention for long, and with 3 daughters in their teens, I don't have much time anyway. However, I've been keeping tabs this year and following them in the news, checking scores on my phone, and this team has me excited for the future. So they are actually pulling me in. I made a concerted effort to watch them last night, pulled up the game on my tablet just in time to watch Amir get rocked for 4 in the first. I turned it off after that. Maybe it's best I continue to keep it casual.