Final Score should have been 91-82

[twwilliams9]

Warrick’s 3 wasn’t a 3. Foot was on the line. Surprised refs didn’t review.

 

[storm1507]

Yes, it was pretty obvious....look at the ref. I couldn't believe that they didn't change that during the first three throw. If it was different the last few minutes it could have changed the way the game was played at the end. Unbelievable!

 

[AshWilliams]

what was the spread

 

[HenryMuto]

How do they not review that

 

[ala_kat2]

Couldn’t UK coaching staff asked for a review? Looks like someone on UK bench could have caught that.

 

[pauled]

Warrick’s 3 wasn’t a 3. Foot was on the line. Surprised refs didn’t review.

The ref is looking right at it!😂 doesn’t care!

 

[Ugoff]

Ref was still holding out hope for a Mizery cover.

 

[ukcatz12]

This is a horrible angle tell where the guys toe was. There was a similar angle on a play in the Bama game where a Bama player dove for the ball and it looked like his shoulder was clearly on the sideline but it was a good 18 inches away from it. It’s also impossible to tell where the refs eyes are looking, so I dont know how everyone thinks he’s clearly looking at it.

 

[twwilliams9]

This is a horrible angle tell where the guys toe was. There was a similar angle on a play in the Bama game where a Bama player dove for the ball and it looked like his shoulder was clearly on the sideline but it was a good 18 inches away from it. It’s also impossible to tell where the refs eyes are looking, so I dont know how everyone thinks he’s clearly looking at it.

Good lord man, his foot is clearly on the line. Gtfo

 

[DraftCat]

Unless the Ref made a live bet at halftime it had no impact on the spread. MO was projected to win by -4.5 at the start of the game.

 

[bbncal02]

This is a horrible angle tell where the guys toe was. There was a similar angle on a play in the Bama game where a Bama player dove for the ball and it looked like his shoulder was clearly on the sideline but it was a good 18 inches away from it. It’s also impossible to tell where the refs eyes are looking, so I dont know how everyone thinks he’s clearly looking at it.

That's on the line and you know it. Stop defending bad officiating.

 

[Fox2monk]

what was the spread

3 or 3.5 I think.

 

[twwilliams9]

This is a horrible angle tell where the guys toe was. There was a similar angle on a play in the Bama game where a Bama player dove for the ball and it looked like his shoulder was clearly on the sideline but it was a good 18 inches away from it. It’s also impossible to tell where the refs eyes are looking, so I dont know how everyone thinks he’s clearly looking at it.

Flipped it for a better “angle” Smh

 

[bbncal02]

Flipped it for a better “angle” Smh

Yeah no excuse for missing that. We all saw it LIVE and made a better call than the dude 10 feet away. AND they still got it wrong on review.

There is no job in the world where you can be as incompetent as an SEC ref and still keep going.

 

[Seth_C]

It was blatantly wrong and given how many goaltending calls have been reversed on us, that they didn’t verify this one was just gross.

 

[silentsaregolden2.0]

Is it possible there is a league with worse officiating? It's like they try to be horrible.