Mark Emmert has been adamant saying this is an academic issue, not an athletics one.
So how's the process gonna play out? Will many athletes be found and linked to the fake classes, thus making them retroactively ineligible once transcripts are calculated without the fake classes, and THEN it becomes an athletics issue the NCAA will have to act on?
I'm curious to see what the line of punishment is, if there's gonna be one.
I think that's what will happen...similar to the Rose situation, the NCAA didn't throw out his test, it was the testing facility board who did that part...thus making him ineligible, which is when the NCAA vacated all games in which he played.
That may be true, but the NCAA sure as hell as jurisdiction over a couple of hundred unauthorized grade changes, and students who had papers written for them.I believe I heard that the accrediting agency, SACS, is to issue a ruling in June concerning this. IF they deem those athletes to have attended bogus classes (from an accreditation standpoint) and invalidates them, then the NCAA can step in and rule those players ineligible. Similar to Rose, where ETS invalidated his SAT, thereby making him ineligible. The NCAA cannot call a college's courses inadequate. They have no jurisdiction there. But SACS does. Or unc** could, but we know they'll never self-report. So it's up to SACS, whose very credibility is at stake.
I believe I heard that the accrediting agency, SACS, is to issue a ruling in June concerning this. IF they deem those athletes to have attended bogus classes (from an accreditation standpoint) and invalidates them, then the NCAA can step in and rule those players ineligible. Similar to Rose, where ETS invalidated his SAT, thereby making him ineligible. The NCAA cannot call a college's courses inadequate. They have no jurisdiction there. But SACS does. Or unc** could, but we know they'll never self-report. So it's up to SACS, whose very credibility is at stake.
I hope the NCAA continues to drag their feet. The dark cloud over unc could be doing as much harm as actual sanctions if recruits are going elsewhere.
Sacs is this from the state of NC or is this a National board ?
I believe I heard that the accrediting agency, SACS, is to issue a ruling in June concerning this. IF they deem those athletes to have attended bogus classes (from an accreditation standpoint) and invalidates them, then the NCAA can step in and rule those players ineligible. Similar to Rose, where ETS invalidated his SAT, thereby making him ineligible. The NCAA cannot call a college's courses inadequate. They have no jurisdiction there. But SACS does. Or unc** could, but we know they'll never self-report. So it's up to SACS, whose very credibility is at stake.
That's exactly what it should be, because that's exactly what it isI don't see why it would be hard at all for the NCAA to simply label the whole mess -- the AF-AM fraud, the Wheels for Heels, the drug and gun cases like PJ Hairston, the tainted jobs to Tami Hansbrough, and on and on -- a massive example of Lack of Institutional Control.
That would give them the latitude to render about whatever punishment they want to, and it would have to be more severe than any previous case of LOIC on the contrast with the wanton corruption of UNC compared to any previous mess would be too obvious.
I don't see why it would be hard at all for the NCAA to simply label the whole mess -- the AF-AM fraud, the Wheels for Heels, the drug and gun cases like PJ Hairston, the tainted jobs to Tami Hansbrough, and on and on -- a massive example of Lack of Institutional Control.
That would give them the latitude to render about whatever punishment they want to, and it would have to be more severe than any previous case of LOIC on the contrast with the wanton corruption of UNC compared to any previous mess would be too obvious.
I don't see why it would be hard at all for the NCAA to simply label the whole mess -- the AF-AM fraud, the Wheels for Heels, the drug and gun cases like PJ Hairston, ex-player Will Graves getting busted for drugs while living in a Roy William's house, the tainted jobs to Tami Hansbrough, and on and on -- a massive example of Lack of Institutional Control.
That would give them the latitude to render about whatever punishment they want to, and it would have to be more severe than any previous case of LOIC on the contrast with the wanton corruption of UNC compared to any previous mess would be too obvious.
If 'more likely than not' under-inflating a few footballs leads to your best player suspended for 4 games, loss of a 1st round draft pick and a 4th round pick, and a $1 million fine, what should be the penalty for a systematic 18 year conspiracy involving members of the athletic department that was designed to keep players eligible to play basketball and football who should not have been, in which the fundamental mission of the university -- to educate young people -- was grotesquely and disgracefully obliterated?
How about the entire UNC athletic program suspended four years, then three scholarships cut for another two years, and a $50 million fine?