You said it #1wildcat... Louisville has no chance to beat a team with the talent of Duke or Kentucky if they don't muck the game up as much as possible. That's just where that program is right now.Originally posted by #1Wildcatfan4life:
It is an ugly game, but that's how Loserville plays. They know they can't match other top teams from an offensive standpoint, so they ugly up the game. It's not very fun to watch.
What they play isn't considered defense. It's hacking, slapping, and hand checking. Just because they get away with it doesn't mean they play good defense.Originally posted by JBHolmesfan:
I disagree that UL sucks. They aren't title contenders but not terrible. Watching them play offense is brutal but they can really play defense. Not many teams play defense the way they do. A lot of people on this board diminish their defensive style as if its a cheap way to play defense. Not many teams have the ability to play defense the way they do. Unfortunately for them, that might be a reason their offense is horrendous. I don't think UL can contend for a title because of their inability to score consistently but they certainly don't suck. 20 points at halftime is certainly a horrible performance offensively. If we played UL again I wouldn't be too worried about the result. Duke might give us a tougher task but they would have to play one of their best games in order to beat UK unless UK comes out and struggles like we did against A&M.
This post was edited on 1/17 1:05 PM by JBHolmesfan
Originally posted by kyfan606:
They suck so bad that ESPN refuses to show the rest of the game.
And they are gonna lose to Iowa today. So did UNC thoughOriginally posted by SilentsAreGolden:
UL's best win this year is Ohio State, who hasn't beaten anyone of substance themselves.
unranked worthless bucknuts who themselves are getting waxed by iowaOriginally posted by SilentsAreGolden:
UL's best win this year is Ohio State, who hasn't beaten anyone of substance themselves.