Did Bradley return to North Carolina?
- Thread starter bigbluedon
- Start date
If he comes back he will be a star..If they get him and Berry back UNCheat will be top 10 again.imo
Yes they will....Berry is 10 times the player Diallo and Briscoe are and Bradley is 10 times the player Humphries is....but they will be back...and some idiot is telling our guys to sign with an agent...
Ehh...maybe preseason. Hicks, Meeks, and Jackson are a lot to lose at once unless you're replacing them with top-flight talent, and UNC isn't. That's a rock-solid 42 points and 20 rebounds per game they're losing from their starting five, and they won't replace all of it. Defenses are really gonna key on Berry, and they'll just double-team Bradley in the post.
Neither is Briscoe or Hump but they left. Frustrating.
It's the nature of the game the NBA has created and UK plays by (as well as other top programs now) . Briscoe and Hump may not have seen the floor some games with the talent Cal is bringing in....They saw the writing on the wall.
That may be true with Hump but Briscoe would've played a lot and probably would've been our starting PG because Cal has been trying hard to get him drafted. Briscoe's ego wouldn't let him return. Hump was probably homesick and can go back to his home country and make money but it's frustrating to see our marginal talent not stick around like other teams. I just don't feel like we will ever win another Title playing only freshmen.
Explain how Skal got a first round pick then
It's like a broken record: A 7 FOOTER WHO CAN KNOCK DOWN OUTSIDE JUMPERS AND CAN REBOUND = A SHOT IN THE NBA.
Briscoe wouldn't have been our starting PG, that's for sure. He may have logged mins at PG but I don't think he would've ever been the primary PG for us.
He'll be back. They always come back when Roy has a good cry with mama.
I figured you'd reply with something stupid. You dont seem to know what potential means. You dont increase or decrease your potential moron. You either reach it or you dont.
Last edited:
To say Bradley is 10x the player Humphries is shows you lack basketball knowledge.
other than crying, at which Roy has established himself as a stud, what else is roy good at? i'm curious as to why players are continually attracted to playing for him, when cal would do much better by them.
Lmao anybody can post all the time if they so choose. I guess I can't blame you for saying that, considering I bashed you. I just think it's bashing Humpries to say Bradley is 10x the player when clearly he's not. So I will ignore your crazy claim that posts matter in regards to discussion on here.
I was kidding with you. Bye the way I once coached at Prestonsburg. I know a little about ball. Bradleys ceiling is much higher than Hump....ok. Not 10 x,s.
I kinda figured you were. Man I just see it a little differently. I think humphries, in today's game, can really be a special player. He can rebound, and has a great mid range game. Kids just 19, and still needs to add some toughness, but it will come. I think his ceiling is higher than Bradley's.
I agree that Bradley's ceiling is much, much higher than Hump's and from what I've seen so does the NBA.
But Berry is only 10X better than Diallo in college today, but not in the pros and not in the future. Briscoe isnt even in the discussion.
I think Hump had a high ceiling in college, shame we wont see it. I do not see it rising as much at the NBA level.
Hump is still really young.
He's got some talent, and he's really big. He also has a chance to be a decent/good shooter from 10-12 feet.
Lots of upside. I don't think he's going to ever be a star, but he could be a 10-6...24 minute guy.
