Speculating that Cal allowed the loss last night to get the teams attention. Possible?
How do you “allow” a loss?Speculating that Cal allowed the loss last night to get the teams attention. Possible?
After I calmed down, lol, I went then to my rationalization mode after hearing the Hagans stuff. Part of me thinks Cal just said eff it last night. Along the lines of if this kid thinks his way is better I will let him learn through hard knocks. Cal said Monday he thought a 2 seed was out of reach and maybe he was willing to let it implode last night once it started just to make a point. I doubt it but who knows.Speculating that Cal allowed the loss last night to get the teams attention. Possible?
I don't think he would ever purposely lose. However, he might do something like "fine lets do it your way and see how it turns out" and when we lose he tells them that type of play doesn't work.
I wonder if that is why Hagans was let back in when he shouldn't have been. Maybe Cal thought if Hagans goes out and makes an ass out of himself that he will realize that he needs to change things as a player. I'm sure coaches do this sometimes to try to send a message to the player.This is exactly what I meant and what the discussion was. If that wasn’t understood I’m sorry. Cal let these kids go at it the way they wanted, and result was not good. As expected. Attention grabbing moment. I don’t think it’s “laughingly absurd.” Cal set the tone earlier by discussing seed possibilities. I believe cal has done this in the past. Anyway, just thought it was good discussion. Both hosts agreed we were still good enough to make some real noise, just had a bad night I’m a game that meant nothing in the SEC race. And thinking about about 2 seed versus 3 seed, thought was that it may not make much of a difference, as we weren’t getting a 1 seen anyway.
I don’t know if he did, but if I won the SEC and knew my team wasn’t listening and a loss would get my team’s attention it wouldn’t bother me one bit as the coach. IF I thought it would teach them a lesson.Speculating that Cal allowed the loss last night to get the teams attention. Possible?
Speculating that Cal allowed the loss last night to get the teams attention. Possible?
Thing I don’t understand is that Maxey was killing UT off the dribble and all of a sudden that stopped.
I know what everyone is gonna say that’s cuz AH was on the bench when Max was going off and that all stopped when AH came back but the past couple games Cal has been playing AH off the ball and allowing Max to do this thing.
Cal just completely went away from Max in the second half. Also why did we stop shooting 3s in the second half? We were lights out from deep with Max and JJ in the first half.
The second half was a complete head scratcher. Coaching and players.
All these things together, coupled with Cal's past of "letting the players figure it out", does make you wonder if he really cared to get the win, thinking that the team could use a bit of a reality check.
Cal never got into the refs, he was already in an odd mood (confirmed), and then he was chatting with Rick Barnes like the loss never happened. I'm not trying to make an excuse for the loss.. but we've kind of seen this before.
I wouldn’t doubt that’s more accurate. He definitely wasn’t coaching hard midway through the 2nd half.I don't think he would ever purposely lose. However, he might do something like "fine lets do it your way and see how it turns out" and when we lose he tells them that type of play doesn't work.
The 2nd half def looked like a team that didn’t have a plan of attack. I also noticed Cal not getting on the refs. Last night was weird for sure.