Every list I have seen has Williams higher than Wilkerson, yet Wilkerson was suppose to be this savior and Williams has become an afterthought.
Williams shoots almost as well as Wilkerson, and he plays defense while Wilkerson reportedly cannot guard a lamppost.
What am I missing? A Sophomore to be that can shoot, play better defense, is three inches taller, and played in a tougher conference, and is rated higher should be viewed as more valuable than a Senior that can shoot, doesn’t play defense, is shorter, plays in a weaker conference, and is lower rated.
I guess because he scores more points and has more experience?
I value experience, but the defense is what gets me. After last season, I guess I overvalue a guy that can straight up lock you down on the perimeter.