Open ? to BBN, Can (?), will UK catch "lightning-in-a-bottle" and have both C. Love and Lloyd Tubman cleared for play this season????
Ahhh talk dirty to me....Originally posted by mtn cat1:
Open ? to BBN, Can (?), will UK catch "lightning-in-a-bottle" and have both C. Love and Lloyd Tubman cleared for play this season????
Pretty much spot on, IMO. Or even if he is eligible, can't see him being a big factor in 2015Originally posted by JHB4UK:
Even in the best case scenario of him being cleared to rejoin the team & enroll in the University I cannot see Lloyd Tubman being able to play on the field in 2015. He hasn't been a part of the team, or practicing, or in the high performance training since the beginning of October 2014. Will not go through a second of Spring practices.
We do not know if or how Tubman has been training, to think that he could not possibly play or able to play is like thinking a true freshman could never see the field their first year.Originally posted by Tskware:
Pretty much spot on, IMO. Or even if he is eligible, can't see him being a big factor in 2015Originally posted by JHB4UK:
Even in the best case scenario of him being cleared to rejoin the team & enroll in the University I cannot see Lloyd Tubman being able to play on the field in 2015. He hasn't been a part of the team, or practicing, or in the high performance training since the beginning of October 2014. Will not go through a second of Spring practices.
Well, that is exactly right, not many true freshman can come in and play very effectively on the defensive line, or at least not many we have recruited.Originally posted by jrburt:
We do not know if or how Tubman has been training, to think that he could not possibly play or able to play is like thinking a true freshman could never see the field their first year.Originally posted by Tskware:
Pretty much spot on, IMO. Or even if he is eligible, can't see him being a big factor in 2015Originally posted by JHB4UK:
Even in the best case scenario of him being cleared to rejoin the team & enroll in the University I cannot see Lloyd Tubman being able to play on the field in 2015. He hasn't been a part of the team, or practicing, or in the high performance training since the beginning of October 2014. Will not go through a second of Spring practices.
I don't think so...he was only here from June to October. With that said, he's older than the traditional freshmen (turned 20 years old last fall) and was already physically ready to play in the SEC.Originally posted by CatsFanGG24:
Tubman went through almost a year of the program.
If academically cleared, he will be able to get on the field.
You get materials for diet and playbook after signing day - 8 months.Originally posted by laxcat#5:
I don't think so...he was only here from June to October. With that said, he's older than the traditional freshmen (turned 20 years old last fall) and was already physically ready to play in the SEC.Originally posted by CatsFanGG24:
Tubman went through almost a year of the program.
If academically cleared, he will be able to get on the field.
This is correct. Legally, this is over. DA has said so.Originally posted by CatDaddy4daWin:
there are no final legal findings in regards to Tubman that I'm aware of he's waiting for. He was not charged/indicted.
Originally posted by WildCard:
I have no idea what is the "hardship" for Love but these things seldom fly. JMO.
Peace
I did not know that. What was the finding? If he was fully exonerated and cleared of all charges I would assume he would be reinstated if his academics are in order.Originally posted by CatsFanGG24:
This is correct. Legally, this is over. DA has said so.Originally posted by CatDaddy4daWin:
there are no final legal findings in regards to Tubman that I'm aware of he's waiting for. He was not charged/indicted.
School wise, it should be finalized soon - whether yes or no.
No true bill. The DA has said that they will no longer pursue the case, there's no real evidence that actually suggests that a rape occurred.Originally posted by WildCard:
I did not know that. What was the finding? If he was fully exonerated and cleared of all charges I would assume he would be reinstated if his academics are in order.Originally posted by CatsFanGG24:
This is correct. Legally, this is over. DA has said so.Originally posted by CatDaddy4daWin:
there are no final legal findings in regards to Tubman that I'm aware of he's waiting for. He was not charged/indicted.
School wise, it should be finalized soon - whether yes or no.
Peace
"It's over." " the case is disposed of"Originally posted by WildCard:
I did not know that. What was the finding? If he was fully exonerated and cleared of all charges I would assume he would be reinstated if his academics are in order.Originally posted by CatsFanGG24:
This is correct. Legally, this is over. DA has said so.Originally posted by CatDaddy4daWin:
there are no final legal findings in regards to Tubman that I'm aware of he's waiting for. He was not charged/indicted.
School wise, it should be finalized soon - whether yes or no.
Peace
Lloyd should be a very good student just by his acceptance to Vandy...Originally posted by CatsFanGG24:
Tubman's issue will be academic progress and how soon he can be eligible if the board reinstates him.
Physically, shouldn't be a problem to be ready for the season.
Maybe some trolls can argue with you but I sure can't.Originally posted by blufvr4evr:
Tubman will be back to UK......WITH WHAT'S GOING ON AT LOUISVILLE HIS MOM WON'T ALLOW HIM TO TRANSFER THERE......TO DISGUSTING FOR HIM TO GO THERE.....JUST A GUESS.......THAT PROGRAM HAS GONE DOWN THE DRAIN......
I do also. People have to be patient, there is no reason whatsoever for UK or Stoops to come to a decision on this right now, or tomorrow. Lloyd isnt enrolled at UK (maybe online correspondence). Can't enroll until after Spring semester (mid May). Can't go through Spring practices since he isnt a student.Originally posted by TuckyFan:
Got this nagging feeling Tubman is allowed to rejoin the team. Maybe it's wishful thinking.
I'm confused. Why is this the case? My guess is the requirements you referenced are for 2nd year players. Given Tubman's circumstances I would think he would be eligible for a wiaver, and would be treated as a first year player academically.Originally posted by PushupMan:
Looks like there was a typo in what WildCard wrote about second year eligibility, and I agree about Tubman no longer having any legal issues to overcome (except for getting cleared by the school to return to classes).
In order to be able to play in 2015, he will need to have completed 24 credit hours, 18 of which were earned before summer school. Hopefully, he's been taking online classes during the fall and the spring so as to preserve his eligibility for 2015.
First of all, I think I wrote it correctly but perhaps confusingly.Originally posted by gossie21:
I'm confused. Why is this the case? My guess is the requirements you referenced are for 2nd year players. Given Tubman's circumstances I would think he would be eligible for a wiaver, and would be treated as a first year player academically.Originally posted by PushupMan:
Looks like there was a typo in what WildCard wrote about second year eligibility, and I agree about Tubman no longer having any legal issues to overcome (except for getting cleared by the school to return to classes).
In order to be able to play in 2015, he will need to have completed 24 credit hours, 18 of which were earned before summer school. Hopefully, he's been taking online classes during the fall and the spring so as to preserve his eligibility for 2015.
Unfortunately for him, UK is not UL. But even if he is allowed to return to UK he will probably have a lot of problems regaining his former status, behind the rest of the team both on and off the field. Probably hard to concentrate on online classes when you don't know if you even have a future or not.Originally posted by WildCard:
I did not know that. What was the finding? If he was fully exonerated and cleared of all charges I would assume he would be reinstated if his academics are in order.Originally posted by CatsFanGG24:
This is correct. Legally, this is over. DA has said so.Originally posted by CatDaddy4daWin:
there are no final legal findings in regards to Tubman that I'm aware of he's waiting for. He was not charged/indicted.
School wise, it should be finalized soon - whether yes or no.
Peace
I'm not an attorney, so I'm probably way off base, but I think he could sue if the application of UK's policy is not consistently applied to all students. In other words, if they do not allow him to enroll based on an accusation of wrongdoing, but they admit other students with similar accusations or proven criminal histories, then they would discriminatory in how they apply their policies. I would think if he is ruled ineligible through UK's code of conduct to enroll in classes, there better not be any student on campus with any criminal accusations or convictions in their history. I don't think he would go that far, but I would actually hope he would if he feels like he is not being treated fairly.Originally posted by jauk11:
Unfortunately for him, UK is not UL. But even if he is allowed to return to UK he will probably have a lot of problems regaining his former status, behind the rest of the team both on and off the field. Probably hard to concentrate on online classes when you don't know if you even have a future or not.
I wouldn't have bad feelings toward him if he did try to sue UK if they do kick him out, doubt if that is even possible or would gain anything for him or not, but I could understand it.
Nope, he couldn't. Every athletic scholarship is a 1-year renewable (at UK's decision) contract. Scholarships can be not renewed for any reason, be they accusations of misconduct or bad haircuts.Originally posted by cat_in_the_hat:
I'm not an attorney, so I'm probably way off base, but I think he could sue if the application of UK's policy is not consistently applied to all students. In other words, if they do not allow him to enroll based on an accusation of wrongdoing, but they admit other students with similar accusations or proven criminal histories, then they would discriminatory in how they apply their policies. I would think if he is ruled ineligible through UK's code of conduct to enroll in classes, there better not be any student on campus with any criminal accusations or convictions in their history. I don't think he would go that far, but I would actually hope he would if he feels like he is not being treated fairly.Originally posted by jauk11:
Unfortunately for him, UK is not UL. But even if he is allowed to return to UK he will probably have a lot of problems regaining his former status, behind the rest of the team both on and off the field. Probably hard to concentrate on online classes when you don't know if you even have a future or not.
I wouldn't have bad feelings toward him if he did try to sue UK if they do kick him out, doubt if that is even possible or would gain anything for him or not, but I could understand it.
This really has nothing to do with the scholarship. It is a question of being able to enroll at the University and take classes. The scholarship is another issue. Playing on the football team is another issue. Neither has anything to do withe being allowed to enroll and take classes. This committee will determine if he can enroll and take classes at UK under any circumstances. If they do not apply their enrollment criteria consistently to all students, I would think there might be grounds for a law suit.Originally posted by JHB4UK:
Nope, he couldn't. Every athletic scholarship is a 1-year renewable (at UK's decision) contract. Scholarships can be not renewed for any reason, be they accusations of misconduct or bad haircuts.Originally posted by cat_in_the_hat:
I'm not an attorney, so I'm probably way off base, but I think he could sue if the application of UK's policy is not consistently applied to all students. In other words, if they do not allow him to enroll based on an accusation of wrongdoing, but they admit other students with similar accusations or proven criminal histories, then they would discriminatory in how they apply their policies. I would think if he is ruled ineligible through UK's code of conduct to enroll in classes, there better not be any student on campus with any criminal accusations or convictions in their history. I don't think he would go that far, but I would actually hope he would if he feels like he is not being treated fairly.Originally posted by jauk11:
Unfortunately for him, UK is not UL. But even if he is allowed to return to UK he will probably have a lot of problems regaining his former status, behind the rest of the team both on and off the field. Probably hard to concentrate on online classes when you don't know if you even have a future or not.
I wouldn't have bad feelings toward him if he did try to sue UK if they do kick him out, doubt if that is even possible or would gain anything for him or not, but I could understand it.