Thats a very good sign for the program.
Does anyone else remember when we AVERAGED 67,000 football attendance with a team that had a losing record in the SEC? Before our football program was ruined from lack of support by our AD, while spending all of UK's football money on the minor NON-REVENUE sports? When we would have had MORE money for the minor none-revenue sports IF football had gotten the support it had EARNED?
@jauk11 🏆🍺Does anyone else remember when we AVERAGED 67,000 football attendance with a team that had a losing record in the SEC? Before our football program was ruined from lack of support by our AD, while spending all of UK's football money on the minor NON-REVENUE sports? When we would have had MORE money for the minor none-revenue sports IF football had gotten the support it had EARNED?
No, I didn't think so, carry on with your hero worship.
Where did I worship Barnhart? This is more of bragging about the fans who are purchasing season tix with the state of the world being what it is.Does anyone else remember when we AVERAGED 67,000 football attendance with a team that had a losing record in the SEC? Before our football program was ruined from lack of support by our AD, while spending all of UK's football money on the minor NON-REVENUE sports? When we would have had MORE money for the minor none-revenue sports IF football had gotten the support it had EARNED?
No, I didn't think so, carry on with your hero worship.
Have you ever criticized him? Back before the flood of money from the OTHER SEC football programs.Where did I worship Barnhart? This is more of bragging about the fans who are purchasing season tix with the state of the world being what it is.
Let.it.goDoes anyone else remember when we AVERAGED 67,000 football attendance with a team that had a losing record in the SEC? Before our football program was ruined from lack of support by our AD, while spending all of UK's football money on the minor NON-REVENUE sports? When we would have had MORE money for the minor none-revenue sports IF football had gotten the support it had EARNED?
No, I didn't think so, carry on with your hero worship.
Why? Because the OTHER SEC football programs saved out butt by flooding us with money?Let.it.go
Yes , I do and I stayed with them through every game. OurDoes anyone else remember when we AVERAGED 67,000 football attendance with a team that had a losing record in the SEC? Before our football program was ruined from lack of support by our AD, while spending all of UK's football money on the minor NON-REVENUE sports? When we would have had MORE money for the minor none-revenue sports IF football had gotten the support it had EARNED?
No, I didn't think so, carry on with your hero worship.
It was in big time ruins with the TWO two win seasons AND the FIVE years in a row without an easily attainable bowl game. Before the other ADs that were paying attention flooded everyone with money. Stoops found us, our AD didn't find him, and even then he only won two games his first year after adding three four stars to our miserly roster.If Kentucky's football program is in ruins with 2 out of the last 4 seasons being 10 wins, then sheesh
No, because that’s the distant past. You harp on it so much. It’s like clockwork. Let it go brother…it will be freeing!Why? Because the OTHER SEC football programs saved out butt by flooding us with money?
It was in big time ruins with the TWO two win seasons AND the FIVE years in a row without an easily attainable bowl game. Before the other ADs that were paying attention flooded everyone with money. Stoops found us, our AD didn't find him, and even then he only won two games his first year after adding three four stars to our miserly roster.
"They sposed to be SEC."
I think UK likely makes more from 55K attendance & the added suites revenue than they would with the old 67-68K seatng capacity.Does anyone else remember when we AVERAGED 67,000 football attendance with a team that had a losing record in the SEC? Before our football program was ruined from lack of support by our AD, while spending all of UK's football money on the minor NON-REVENUE sports? When we would have had MORE money for the minor none-revenue sports IF football had gotten the support it had EARNED?
No, I didn't think so, carry on with your hero worship.
If you are talking about season ticket sales in 2009 we had LOTS and LOTS more.So 2015 we had more? Lol wuttt
The FACTS are FACTS no matter how many pretty pictures you post.
- guy with a terrible opinion trying to bring down a thread about over half of the arena being full 40+ days before kickoffThe FACTS are FACTS no matter how many pretty pictures you post.
It is all about the money isn't it? I will bet UK gets as much or more money from fans that don't attend games as those that do.I think UK likely makes more from 55K attendance & the added suites revenue than they would with the old 67-68K seatng capacity.
It was FULL for every game for a team with about half that many wins. With 6000 more seats. I don't have a problem except for the misdirected credit for our revival from the dead, I am very happy with what Stoops has done here.- guy with a terrible opinion trying to bring down a thread about over half of the arena being full 40+ days before kickoff
Project your problems elsewhere
It wasn't full of season ticket holders nor half full of season ticket holders.It was FULL for every game for a team with about half that many wins. With 6000 more seats. I don't have a problem except for the misdirected credit for our revival from the dead, I am very happy with what Stoops has done here.
If we beat Florida in game 2, those available tickets for South Carolina, MSU, and UL will be all gone within weeks.
Wrong! Hours.If we beat Florida in game 2, those available tickets for South Carolina, MSU, and UL will be all gone within weeks.
He's ate up with it can't let it go.Let.it.go
Many will be gone by kickoff!If we beat Florida in game 2, those available tickets for South Carolina, MSU, and UL will be all gone within weeks.
That was a different era. Very few schools fill their stadiums unless a quality and well known opponent comes to town. Ticket prices, concessions, and bad parking options have made it a less desirable product.Does anyone else remember when we AVERAGED 67,000 football attendance with a team that had a losing record in the SEC? Before our football program was ruined from lack of support by our AD, while spending all of UK's football money on the minor NON-REVENUE sports? When we would have had MORE money for the minor none-revenue sports IF football had gotten the support it had EARNED?
No, I didn't think so, carry on with your hero worship.
But we averaged capacity with a team that finished 3-5 in the SEC. With 6,000 more seats than we have now.That was a different era. Very few schools fill their stadiums unless a quality and well known opponent comes to town. Ticket prices, concessions, and bad parking options have made it a less desirable product.
I remember when we averaged 49,000 for many years in the 90s, so let’s not act like 67,000 was ever the norm for UK.Does anyone else remember when we AVERAGED 67,000 football attendance with a team that had a losing record in the SEC? Before our football program was ruined from lack of support by our AD, while spending all of UK's football money on the minor NON-REVENUE sports? When we would have had MORE money for the minor none-revenue sports IF football had gotten the support it had EARNED?
No, I didn't think so, carry on with your hero worship.
Couch was a once in several generation QB that we got because he was in state. And naturally he attracted a lot of other talent. And let's not go into ancient history, the popularity of football and it's growth into the MONEY COW is a fairly recent phenomenon.I remember when we averaged 49,000 for many years in the 90s, so let’s not act like 67,000 was ever the norm for UK.
I was at the 1994 NE Louisiana game where we only had 32,000 fans and I was at the 1995 game against Cincinnati where we only had 25,000 fans. So if you think the brief attendance run we had at the tail end of Brooks’ tenure is normal, then you must be new to being a UK fan.
The pattern the last couple of decades has been for UK’s attendance to spike when there’s a lot of positivity around some combination of a couple of factors like: how we finished the prior year, a coaching change we’re excited about or a QB we’re excited about. That spike lasts about three years and then starts to tail off.
We averaged 40,647 in 1996 and then jumped up to capacity crowds for three years starting in 1997 thanks to the combination of Mumme and Couch.
Average attendance then slowly died down to a low of 57,330 in 2006. Starting in 2007, we saw another 3 year spike of capacity crowds because of excitement around Woodson and the 2007 team.
The other pattern you see is that if there is a ticket price increase and we end up having a disappointing season that same year, then attendance drops significantly the following year. It happened after 2010 and after 2015. You seem to forget that in 2015, our 61,000 seat stadium averaged crowds of 61,295.
Long story short, attendance at UK has waxed and waned due to normal football factors, not because of any nonsense about a lack of support from Barnhart.
I'm sure you are correct. However, it could have easily been made to 80K in the stadium and even more luxury suites. The stadium was initially designed to be expanded over time - are you ready for this - to 110,000 potential. It was initially designed to become a complete bowl of the first level the same all around with the potential to add a third level. The full bowl would have brought capacity to the 80,000 range and then a third level was going to be up to 15,000 per side. I never thought it would get to 110K, but I did think it would have easily been able to get to the 80K level - which would make it 8th largest in current SEC stadiums - that would be about the size of South Carolina Stadium. Our current stadium size is relatively close to Ole Miss, Miss. State and Missouri. Only Vanderbilt has a smaller seating capacity than UK.I think UK likely makes more from 55K attendance & the added suites revenue than they would with the old 67-68K seatng capacity.
I don't know the exact year we added more bleacher EZ seats to bring capacity up to around 62K, but I think capacity was 58K for most of the 90's.I remember when we averaged 49,000 for many years in the 90s, so let’s not act like 67,000 was ever the norm for UK.
OK, but I don't see the relevance to today when we don't sell out at 62K game in/out. Net, seems like we're in a good place.I'm sure you are correct. However, it could have easily been made to 80K in the stadium and even more luxury suites. The stadium was initially designed to be expanded over time - are you ready for this - to 110,000 potential.
Actually for three straight seasons 06-10 we averaged 69k+ and top 25 in attendance.....and yes I very much remember seeing 71k in CommonwealthDoes anyone else remember when we AVERAGED 67,000 football attendance with a team that had a losing record in the SEC? Before our football program was ruined from lack of support by our AD, while spending all of UK's football money on the minor NON-REVENUE sports? When we would have had MORE money for the minor none-revenue sports IF football had gotten the support it had EARNED?
No, I didn't think so, carry on with your hero worship.
It's a stadium.....not a bball arena....BIG difference lol- guy with a terrible opinion trying to bring down a thread about over half of the arena being full 40+ days before kickoff
Project your problems elsewhere