I wish you were right, but unfortunately you probably aren't. The 5 losses to unranked teams is not a simplistic argument at all. It is the way the selection committee assesses the season. They look at the full body of work during the whole season. Many fans are on an adrenaline high now because we are winning. A few weeks ago, this board was depressing. If you have a hard time seeing 8 teams with better resumes, that means you are blinded by a couple of blowouts over Florida, Georgia, South Carolina. You might have forgotten what happened before that, but the selection committee will not. It is actually easy to see 8 teams with better NCAAT resumes. But we don't need to debate this. All we have to do is wait a couple weeks.
Here's one example of why you're wrong...
Oregon has 6 losses to unranked teams. They were a 2 seed in that mock draft done last week. By your logic, that should be impossible.
I'll grant you that who we lost to will be one factor in determining our seed. But it's only part of the story. Who we beat, RPI, winning our conference - these count too.
And your statement that all we need to do is wait a couple of weeks is silly. This entire argument is about our ceiling, not a prediction of where we will end up.
The only way we will know if you were right or not in a couple weeks is if we actually run the table. Because our ceiling would be the seed we could obtain if we win all remaining games.
My contention is that if we do that, standing on selection Sunday as SEC champ, SEC tourney champ, as well as all the metrics that would accompany such a win streak, we would be a 2 at worst.
For us to win out and not be a 2, some other teams would have to do some extraordinary things to separate themselves. Considering how many of those teams will have to play each other, that will be difficult, if not impossible.