Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
At this point, I don't see UK as the favorite in any games other than Louisianay Lafayette and Eastern Kentucky. Ya'll obviously "could" beat several other teams but I don't see any where a "should" applies. I'll predict 4 wins.
For those counting Vandy as a sure win, please recall that the talent was in place to have an over/under of 6 last year (along with most predicting another bowl) and that same talent is still around. While coaching clearly matters, it would not surprise me to see 3-win Coach Mason's record improve somewhat like Coach Stoops' record improved (2 wins followed by 5 wins). James Franklin picked up a Vandy team that had gone 2-10 the last two years and won 6 (then 9 and 9) with that 2-10 talent. While Coach Mason isn't James Franklin, and totally bombed last year, Mason is generally regarded as an outstanding defensive coach and will be directly coaching the defense this season while Andy Ludwig (who did a solid job at Wisconsin without exceptional talent except at running back) takes over the offense. The talent that James Franklin recruited (which is similar to what Coach Stoops landed), is now ready to play so talent is there. Specifically, Vandy's recruiting classes in 2012 and 2013 were #29 and #19 while UK's recruiting classes in 2013 and 2014 were #29 and #17. If one compares only 2012 and 2013 (assuming that 2014 is so recent that those players won't contribute), then recruiting for Vandy for those recruits making the impact is #29 and #19 while UK is #63 and #29.
While it would be silly to predict great things for Vandy following a 3-9 season, I do think that Vandy has the potential to play far better than most on this board think (given that almost 100% here seem to think that Vandy is a "sure win" in Nashville for UK). While last year's UK 10-point home win is the most recent and therefore the most meaningful, the relevant four year total is Vandy 107, UK 31. UK may well win on the road in Nashville (after the gauntlet of Auburn, Mississippi State, Tennessee and Georgia), but I really don't see how one can reasonably say it is a "should" at this stage unless one just assumes that Mason will remain a train-wreck (although Coach Stoops won fewer games than Mason in Stoops' first year). You'll know a lot more, as will I, about what the UK-Vandy game should be after Vandy's opener against Western Kentucky.
Well, the OP asked for "season standings" predictions, so that can be interpreted a few ways. here are mine:
ULL - Win, but tougher than we would like.
USC - Loss. hard-fought, but they get a few breaks to win.
UF - Win. It's time. Night game. This game is this year's South Carolina game.
Mizzou - Loss. Let-down game. They are pesky and win by 10.
EKU - Win.
Auburn - Loss. We lead at half, but they wear us down in the second.
MSU - Loss. Can't seem to beat Dan Mullen.
UT - Win. My upset special. They play Alabama the week prior, and check the records of teams the week AFTER they play bama. Hint - It's not good.
Vandy - Win. Ugly game in nashville, as they always are.
UGA - Loss. We tend to play them well (except for last year), but it isn't happening.
Charlotte - Win.
UL - Win. I think we win b/c I think we have the better team this year. This is a bit of a leap of faith, b/c UK's only win over Petrino came in his first year at Arky, but I just don't think we lose to them at home this year.
Final - 7-5, 3-5. The one I feel iffiest about is UT, but I could argue that we could beat Mizzou if we lose to UT. In the end, I'd be elated b/c UK would have beaten its three teams that It most wants to beat (UT, UF, UL) in the same year. 6-6 would also be a step forward, but have to get to a bowl to signify forward momentum.
My SECE standings:
UGA 6-2
UT 4-4
Mizz 4-4
USC 3-5
UK 3-5
UF 2-6
Vandy 0-8
would be nice, but we aren't on the same level with UT yet. We won't win that game. They are far more talented. I think they will win the East.
Eh, I dunno. They should have lost to the same USCe team that we beat, and their signature win is Iowa, so I'm not quite sold on all of the hype. With that said, you're definitely right that they are recruiting at a very high level, so they should be tough to beat. I'm just a big believer in the importance of game placement on the schedule, and I think that one sets up perfectly for us (as opposed to MSU which gets La Tech before our game and then gets a bye week after our game).
I never know what "should have lost" means. Either the did lose or they didn't. And UT has beaten South Carolina 2 years in a row if my memory serves correctly. In last years game, South Carolina was outcoached and Joshua Dobbs ended the game looking like a force to be reckoned with. They won that game on the road the week after playing Alabama. They lost to Georgia and Florida by a combined 4 points. And probably would have beaten Florida except for an expired play clock that the refs didn't see (or ignored); but I can't say they should have won that game because they obviously didn't. If Kentucky beats Tennessee this season that will be the signature win of his career up to this point.
At this point, I don't see UK as the favorite in any games other than Louisiana Lafayette, Eastern Kentucky and Charlotte. Ya'll obviously "could" beat several other teams but I don't see any where a "should" applies. I'll predict 5 wins.
For those counting Vandy as a sure win, please recall that the talent was in place to have an over/under of 6 last year (along with most predicting another bowl) and that same talent is still around. While coaching clearly matters, it would not surprise me to see 3-win Coach Mason's record improve somewhat like Coach Stoops' record improved (2 wins followed by 5 wins). James Franklin picked up a Vandy team that had gone 2-10 the last two years and won 6 (then 9 and 9) with that 2-10 talent. While Coach Mason isn't James Franklin, and totally bombed last year, Mason is generally regarded as an outstanding defensive coach and will be directly coaching the defense this season while Andy Ludwig (who did a solid job at Wisconsin without exceptional talent except at running back) takes over the offense. The talent that James Franklin recruited (which is similar to what Coach Stoops landed), is now ready to play so talent is there. Specifically, Vandy's recruiting classes in 2012 and 2013 were #29 and #19 while UK's recruiting classes in 2013 and 2014 were #29 and #17. If one compares only 2012 and 2013 (assuming that 2014 is so recent that those players won't contribute), then recruiting for Vandy for those recruits making the impact is #29 and #19 while UK is #63 and #29.
While it would be silly to predict great things for Vandy following a 3-9 season, I do think that Vandy has the potential to play far better than most on this board think (given that almost 100% here seem to think that Vandy is a "sure win" in Nashville for UK). While last year's UK 10-point home win is the most recent and therefore the most meaningful, the relevant four year total is Vandy 107, UK 31. UK may well win on the road in Nashville (after the gauntlet of Auburn, Mississippi State, Tennessee and Georgia), but I really don't see how one can reasonably say it is a "should" at this stage unless one just assumes that Mason will remain a train-wreck (although Coach Stoops won fewer games than Mason in Stoops' first year). You'll know a lot more, as will I, about what the UK-Vandy game should be after Vandy's opener against Western Kentucky.
7-5 (3-5) get to a Music City Bowl
Wins:
All 4 OOC
South Carolina OR Florida
Vanderbilt
Missouri
Could easily be 8-4 or 5-7.....hoping for the better.
Again, I acknowledge that A) UT is recruiting well and B ) it will be a very tough game for UK. I gave my reasons for the pick. With that said, USCe was up by two TDs with less than two minutes remaining at home. They should have won the game. That's not controversial.
And yes, if we beat UT, then that would undoubtedly be the signature win of CMS' career. Nothing controversial about that statement either.