NKU gets the rebound after a missed free throw and makes a 2 to tie the game
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anyway to watch besides espn + which I still can’t figure out
Pretty much where I am. Always foul in those situations. I've never watched it backfire live like it sounds like it did here.It happens once in hundred times, maybe. Guys hit 3 point shots with much higher frequency.
I had a coworker tell me that years ago. Said she was afraid that if she was in the water and sinking, she might not be able to get her belt off, or if the car caught on fire she could be trapped...I don't wear a seatbelt, because I've heard of times when the seatbelt actually killed somebody in a wreck
The stats say this isn't true but ok.It happens once in hundred times, maybe. Guys hit 3 point shots with much higher frequency.
Except statistics show that not wearing a seatbelt would be an ignorant thing to do. What do the the stats show for fouling vs not fouling? But I don't blame them for fouling here with only a few seconds leftI don't wear a seatbelt, because I've heard of times when the seatbelt actually killed somebody in a wreck
Agreed, idk how many game tying or winning 3’s I’ve seen over the years but it feels like it’s about 50% when a team is blowing a lead.It happens once in hundred times, maybe. Guys hit 3 point shots with much higher frequency.
Xbox or PlayStation has the espn app that you can access ESPN plus.Anyway to watch besides espn + which I still can’t figure out
Bill Self is also not in that situation very often if I had to guess.Bill Self never fouls in that situation and his coaching record is not too shabby.
3 seconds left is a HUGE difference than 8-10 seconds. Statically it's under 6 seconds left up 3 when fouling is the best play. This has been discussed a million times on here.It happens once in hundred times, maybe. Guys hit 3 point shots with much higher frequency.
Backfires plenty. Statistically there is no difference in success between the two options.Pretty much where I am. Always foul in those situations. I've never watched it backfire live like it sounds like it did here.
Backfires plenty. Statistically there is no difference in success between the two options.
First one that comes to mind that backfired big time was in 2019 Elite 8 between Purdue and Virginia. Purdue is leading 70-67 and intentionally fouls with 5.9 seconds left. Virginia makes the first, then intentionally misses the second. They get the long rebound, and their guy throws one in at the buzzer, forcing OT (which Virginia goes on to win).
Many more instances like that as well, as the percentages bear that out. Some of our fans live in denial if it means taking a shot at Cal...
That was the luckiest rebound and shot I’ve ever seen for real. That’s when I knew Purdue was legit cursed for a final 4.Backfires plenty. Statistically there is no difference in success between the two options.
First one that comes to mind that backfired big time was in 2019 Elite 8 between Purdue and Virginia. Purdue is leading 70-67 and intentionally fouls with 5.9 seconds left. Virginia makes the first, then intentionally misses the second. They get the long rebound, and their guy throws one in at the buzzer, forcing OT (which Virginia goes on to win).
Many more instances like that as well, as the percentages bear that out. Some of our fans live in denial if it means taking a shot at Cal...
Statistically they actually do not. The chances of winning if you don't foul are better than if you do.It happens once in hundred times, maybe. Guys hit 3 point shots with much higher frequency.
Then I'd love to see those stats. I'm not saying you are wrong since you're a good poster but I've watched thousands of games and can't reemember ever once seeing a team pull that off. I remember lots of game winning or tying threes.The stats say this isn't true but ok.
If you go back to the post after that game we lost there were people linking the stats and it was basically 50-50 on whether you should foul or not, I think not fouling was slightly favored according to stats. I don’t have the links though. Personally I think under 10 seconds you probably should foul.Then I'd love to see those stats. I'm not saying you are wrong since you're a good poster but I've watched thousands of games and can't reemember ever once seeing a team pull that off. I remember lots of game winning or tying threes.
When I disagree with that I am definitely not taking a shot at Cal, in specific.Backfires plenty. Statistically there is no difference in success between the two options.
First one that comes to mind that backfired big time was in 2019 Elite 8 between Purdue and Virginia. Purdue is leading 70-67 and intentionally fouls with 5.9 seconds left. Virginia makes the first, then intentionally misses the second. They get the long rebound, and their guy throws one in at the buzzer, forcing OT (which Virginia goes on to win).
Many more instances like that as well, as the percentages bear that out. Some of our fans live in denial if it means taking a shot at Cal...
Like you and $Z71$ pointed out time is surely a critical factor. So I'd like to see the stats separated by time and just not on who wound up winning the game but on how often the making the 1st shot, intentionally missing the 2nd, getting the rebound, and then scoring two points worked. If, for example there were 12 second to go and the team shooting free throws failed but then got a turnover for the win, that's an entirely different situation than we are talking about here.If you go back to the post after that game we lost there were people linking the stats and it was basically 50-50 on whether you should foul or not, I think not fouling was slightly favored according to stats. I don’t have the links though. Personally I think under 10 seconds you probably should foul.
I don't wear a parachute, they don't open sometimesI don't wear a seatbelt, because I've heard of times when the seatbelt actually killed somebody in a wreck
I know this is a joke. But one my mom's friends is a state trooper. He's seen many people split from the waist down. Due to seatbelts. Kinda a damned if you damned if you dont type deal.I don't wear a seatbelt, because I've heard of times when the seatbelt actually killed somebody in a wreck