ADVERTISEMENT

This teams defense

LXWildcat

Sophomore
Nov 25, 2023
1,634
5,810
113
I know there are some things this team will need to improve on when it comes to their defense. Would this team be better if they played zone instead of man to man?
 
Calipari be like.

Season 2 No GIF by Martin
 
Why don't we just try to keep improving our man to man D.

We have a bunch of kids that have never probably played zone. Any flaws we have in our man to man we would also have flaws in a zone with inexperienced players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mebeblue2
Why don't we just try to keep improving our man to man D.

We have a bunch of kids that have never probably played zone. Any flaws we have in our man to man we would also have flaws in a zone with inexperienced players.
Every basketball player is familiar with zone defenses and have played at some point before getting to College. Back to the OT, we will likely never find out as cal would rather lose playing M2M the whole game rather than win playing a zone.
 
Yeah, a zone might work. But even using zone principles, the biggest key is still moving your feet and staying in front of the man coming at you. I agree with others, that is what they need to keep working on. They're not terrible defensively- the potential is obviously there. It's just a matter of working on that lateral movement and improving their quickness. I've seen some improvement, it's just not enough. They're strong enough offensively that they've been getting by with being less than stellar on defense. They have to get serious about it in SEC play because the conference will be defending us stronger than we've seen so far. Shots won't come easily, so defense must improve. I'm sure Calipari has been telling them this.
 
I tend to think a team that is poor defensively is a team that's poor defensively regardless of whether they are in man to man or zone. Going to a zone won't magically help things.

It's kind of a shame because rim protection has been a huge reason why our defense hasn't been good since 2015. You'd think our team with all these 7 footers would be better.
 
Zone defense is used for 2 main reasons. The other team is more athletic and your guards can't stay in front of their guards. The other is to "somewhat" protect players from foul trouble.

On the flip side it exposes you to the 3 point shot and offensive rebounds. I hated playing zone and rarely used it. On the rare occasion I did I played a 1-3-1. You have to be extremely sound and tied together to make a zone successful.

With that said I prefer man to man.
 
I tend to think a team that is poor defensively is a team that's poor defensively regardless of whether they are in man to man or zone. Going to a zone won't magically help things.

It's kind of a shame because rim protection has been a huge reason why our defense hasn't been good since 2015. You'd think our team with all these 7 footers would be better.
We've had solid defensive teams without dominant rim protection. The 2011, 2017, and 2019 teams were all pretty good on defense and lacked a shot blocking 5 in the best 5.

Even with a good shot blocker in 2020 and a fantastic defensive 5 in 2021, neither teams were able to play elite defense. I tend to think some of our defensive deficiencies are baked into Cal's system these days.
 
Last edited:
We have good rebounding guards who push the action or throw ahead after pulling down the board and I don't think you want to do anything to slow down this teams transition game.
 
Zone defense is used for 2 main reasons. The other team is more athletic and your guards can't stay in front of their guards. The other is to "somewhat" protect players from foul trouble.

On the flip side it exposes you to the 3 point shot and offensive rebounds. I hated playing zone and rarely used it. On the rare occasion I did I played a 1-3-1. You have to be extremely sound and tied together to make a zone successful.

With that said I prefer man to man.
Good post.

A lot of people think it's easy to play a good zone and automatically think it would improve the team on the defensive end. It takes a lot time and practice to be somewhat successful with it.

A good Coach with good shooters/rebounding would eat up a zone full of young players at this level.

I personally don't want our opponent to slow down the ball against this group.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dickieVIII
I think using a zone defense for this team would have to be highly situational, using 1 - 3 - 1 OR 2 /3 would have to be something used more of as a disruption tactic for a couple possessions or against a particular team we have matchup problems with. And I can't think of anyone that falls into the latter.

Suddenly going 1 - 3 - 1 or 2/3 would be shocking and i would think immediately force a timeout from the other team. It might be something to have as a gimmick, but to use regularly, nah. I don't think it's needed, just let them keep playing man to man and get as good as they can doing it.
 
Zone defense is used for 2 main reasons. The other team is more athletic and your guards can't stay in front of their guards. The other is to "somewhat" protect players from foul trouble.

On the flip side it exposes you to the 3 point shot and offensive rebounds. I hated playing zone and rarely used it. On the rare occasion I did I played a 1-3-1. You have to be extremely sound and tied together to make a zone successful.

With that said I prefer man to man.
I agree with all of that, but will add a third reason, to switch things up and cause the other team time on the shot clock to get a shot off. If you always play the same, they know how to attack it.
But that said, I am generally anti-zone. It also hurts your rebounding which is not a strength for us.
 
with teams putting up 40 3's a game a zone defense looks like a recipe for disaster
 
Defense (more specifically interior defense) is the main reason why we haven't had as much success post 15 than we did pre 15.

Instead of debating zone or man to man, I think the bigger question going forward is why this continues to be the case.

This season teams are shooting 49.9% from 2 against us. This is 168th in the NCAA.

Lets look at these rankings from 2010 to 2015.
2010 = 6th
2011 = 8th
2012 = 1st
2013 = 8th
2014 = 49th
2015 = 2nd

Post 15?
2016 = 11th
2017 = 131st
2018 = 90th
2019 = 8th
2020 = 25th
2021 = 56th
2022 = 73rd
2023 = 100th
2024 = 168th

It's clear as day we need to improve in this area.
 
What has happened to Cal's teaching defense ability the last few years? That used to be a big part of Cal's coaching. If it doesn't improve greatly by March we will not get out of the first weekend
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatguy87
Rebound! And be the best team at it! = promise land for this team. It will cover up the weakness in defense! Defense in March must be ready!
 
Cal is not a zone coach. Never has been. Never will be.

We haven’t had the personnel to play defense the last 3 seasons.

We do now. Cal is a great defensive coach. This team is going to improve on defense every week.

Cal is not going to play a zone and call it something else, (ball line, pack line or any other line).

Cal is going to play straight up man, switch everything, don’t gamble, defense.

Play great first shot defense and rebound. That’s his formula and it’s not changing.
 
IMO our players don't move their feet good enough to play good defense and have a tendency of leaving their feet way to often. You've got to fall in love with defense to be really good at it. I got a bigger thrill out of making a great defensive play than making a good offensive play because it got in the opposition head much more.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT