Maybe Brooks would coach better but Brooks piss poor recruits would still be there if he were the coach.
Bullsht. Brooks never had an ounce of the backing this staff has had. Never got the facility upgrades promised. Constantly being harassed by fans and media from day one.
Brooks had the chance to recruit Ohio....he basically did zero recruiting there.
Didn't have the connections there like Stoops has, and didnt have the luxury of someone taking the Cats to 4-5 bowl games shortly BEFORE he ever set foot on campus. Period
Brooks had the same job for 8 years and he screwed the Woodson, Tamme, Burton, Stevie, Little and Lyons offense to Music City Bowl. (And for the record he lost with that team to a ho-hum USC team on the road...
If you were at the game you'd know the players and Joker cost us that game. As much as I love those players and Andre it was a deer in the headlights type of moment for Woodson.
and a poor Miss St team at home.....let that sink in as we kiss up to PaPa Brooks)
I just don't see the love greater for Brooks than Stoops. Brooks was decent, Stoops is a step above decent....neither are great coaches IMO
Brooks is a better coach than UK could ever show him to be. No history. No recruiting budget. Aged out facilities. Poor football fan base. Small recruiting market. Piss poor national perception.
The only coaches with enough courage to try to turn this sht around are lambasted from the minute they arrive if they don't have a big name (for all that's ever done). They have to work 4x as hard here to get anywhere, and have to work AGAINST the vampiric "fan"base sucking the life out of the program with their constant abuse of the staff, program, and players.
The idiots that think a GREAT coach that's already accomplished anything major would want to come here are delusional or psychotic. No one would want to come here seeing the amount of negativity they have to put up with from the fans of the basketball program. It's just not worth an extra million dollars